Skip to main content

Role Play as Analogical Modelling in Science

  • Chapter
Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education

Part of the book series: Science & Technology Education Library ((CTISE,volume 30))

5. Conclusion

The evidence that analogical role play provides a motivating, interesting and enjoyable way to sustain student engagement with ideas may be reason enough to include the strategy in the teaching repertoire. But analogical role play provides much more than affective gains. Role plays can be used to portray ideas and promote discussion. As the role plays evolve in response to this discussion they provide a powerful way to encourage students to think scientifically through analogical reasoning. The dialogue used and developed in the process of producing and analysing the role plays contributes to a successful learning experience. It not only helps to enhance understanding of the concepts being studied at the time but fosters learning during discussions in subsequent lessons.

It is tempting to avoid analogical role play, particularly where the students construct their own model, because the model must by its very nature be incorrect. Yet in classes such as Steve’s, the thinking and learning which occur are difficult to deny.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

5.1 References

  • Aubusson, P., Barr, R., Perkovic, L. & Fogwill, S. (1997). What happens when students do simulation-role-play in science. Research in Science Education, 27, 565–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1989). Science learning and drama processes. Science Education, 73(5), 569–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chester, M., & Fox, R. (1966). Role playing methods in the classroom. Chicago: Science Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove, M. (1995). A case study of science-in-the-making as students generate an analogy for electricity. International Journal of Science Education, 17, 295–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning in science. Science Education, 75, 649–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1991). The unschooled mind: How children think and how schools should teach. New York: Basic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. K., & Boulter, C. J. (1998). Learning science through models and modelling. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 53–66). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodrum, D., Hackling, M., & Rennie, L. (2001). The status and quality of teaching and learning science in Australian schools. DETYA: Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (1999). Modelling in science lessons: Are there better ways to learn with models? School Science and Mathematics, 98(8), 420–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, A. G., & Treagust, D. F. (2000). A typology of school science models. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1011–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, D. (2002). The place of analogies in science education. Cambridge Journal of Science Education, 32(2), 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hildebrand, G. M. (1989). Creating a gender inclusive science education. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 35, 7–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiotis, H. (1993). Using creative writing and drama to learn science. Australian Science Teachers Journal, 39 37–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladrousse, G. P. (1989). Role play. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, G., & Aucoin, J. (1998). Refrigeration dynamics. Role-play helps students understand lessons beyond the level of the textbook. The Science Teacher, 65(9), 33–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maksic, Z.B. (1990). Theoretical models of chemical bonding Part 1: Atomic hypothesis and the concept of molecular structure. New York: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • McSharry, G., & Jones, S. (2000). Role-play in science teaching and learning. School Science Review, 82, 73–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobin, K., & Fraser, B. J. (1988). Investigations of exemplary practice in high school science and mathematics. Australian Journal of Education. 32,1, 75–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treagust, D. F. (1993). The evolution of an approach for using analogies in teaching and learning science. Research in Science Education, 23, 293–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treagust, D. F., Harrison, A. G., Venville, G. J., & Dagher, Z. (1996). Using an analogical teaching approach to engender conceptual change. International Journal of Science Education, 18, 213–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. E., & Lutz, M. V. (1994). Integrated science: the importance of “how” versus “what”. School Science and Mathematics, 94, 338–346.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R. E. (1989). A rationale for using personal relevance as a science curriculum focus in schools. School Science and Mathematics, 89, 144–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Aubusson, P.J., Fogwill, S. (2006). Role Play as Analogical Modelling in Science. In: Aubusson, P.J., Harrison, A.G., Ritchie, S.M. (eds) Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education. Science & Technology Education Library, vol 30. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3830-5_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics