This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
AEBC Agriculture and Environment Biotechnology Commission (2001). Crops on Trial, London: AEBC. See also URL: http://www.aebc.gov.uk
AEBC Agriculture and Environment Biotechnology Commission (2002), ‘A debate about the issue of possible commercialisation of GM crops in the UK’, Report of the Public Attitudes Group, London: AEBC. See also URL: http://www.aebc.gov.uk
Banthien, H., M. Jaspers and A. Renner (2003), Governance of the European Research Area. The Role of Civil Society, Bensheim: Institut für Organisationskommunikation. URL: http://www.ifok.de
Brown, P. (2004), ‘GM crops to get go-ahead. Leaked papers reveal decision’, The Guardian (19 February): 1.
British Broadcasting Cooperation (BBC 5 February 2003), ‘GM debate to inlcude crop trials’, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/2727969.stm.
Burgess, J., T. Anderson, D. Dallas, A. Irwin, S. Joss, C. Marris, J. Petts, S. Rayner, A. Sterling, T. Wakeford and B. Wynne (4 November 2002), Some Observations on the 2002–2003 Public Dialogue on Possible Commercialisation of GM Crops in the UK, London: University College London.
Curry, D. (2003), ‘Squaring the transgenic crop circle’, The Financial Times (17 October): 21.
Dahl, R. (1994), ‘A democratic dilemma: System effectiveness versus citizen participation’, Political Science Quarterly 109 (spring 1994): 23–34.
Daily Mail (17 February 2003), ‘“GM a danger for the future,” says Meacher’, Article by S. Poulter.
DEFRA (Department for Environment Food and Rural Affairs) (2002a), UK Government, Scottish Executive and Northern Ireland Department of the Environment Response to Crops on Trial Report, London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
DEFRA (2002b), Public Dialogue on GM. UK Government Response to AEBC Advice Submitted in April 2002, London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
DEFRA (9 March 2004), The GM Dialogue: Government Response, London: Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs.
ENDS (1999), Government Still Struggling to Master the Biotechnology Agenda, ENDS Report no. 292 (May 1999).
European Communities (2001), European Governance. A White Paper, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (ISBN 92-894-1061-2).
Fisher, F. (1999), ‘Technological deliberation in a democratic society: The case for participatory inquiry’, Science and Public Police 26(5): 294–302.
Fixdahl, J. (1997), ‘Consensus conferences as extended peer review’, Science and Public Policy 24(6): 366–76.
Forest Row GM Debate (27 June, 2003), For a full transcript of the debate, see URL: http://www.sussexgmforum.org.ukGMdebate_transcript_june03.htm.
Gaskell, G., M.W. Bauer, N. Allum, N. Lindsey, J. Durant, and J. Leuginger (2001), ‘United Kingdom: Spilling the beans on genes’, in G. Gaskell and M.W. Bauer (eds.), Biotechnology 1996–2000. The Years of Controversy, London: Science Museum, pp. 292–306.
Grote, J.R. and B. Gbikpi (2002), Participatory Governance. Political and Societal Implications, Opladen: Leske & Budrich.
Hails, R. and J. Kinerlerer (2003), ‘The GM public debate: Context and communication strategies’, Nature Reviews Genetics 4 (October 2003): 819–25.
House of Commons (12 March 2001), Fourth Report of the Select Committee on Science and Technology, London: House of Commons.
House of Commons (11 November 2003), GM Science Review, Debate Pack, page 27 (referring to HC Deb 17 July 2003 Vol 409 c 504-6), London: House of Commons Library. URL: http://hcl1.hclibrary.parliament.uk/parliament/debatepacks.asp.
Independent on Sunday (27 February 2000), ‘The key to GM is potential, both for harm and good’, Article by Tony Blair.
Joss, S. and S. Bellucci (eds.), (2002), Participatory Technology Assessment. European Perspectives, London: Centre for the Study of Democracy (University of Westminster).
Joss, S., A. Mohr and C. Parau (2003), The GM Food Controversy, the AEBC and the GM National Debate, PubAcc Report, London: University of Westminster (unpublished paper).
Kooiman, J. (ed.), (1993), Modern Governance. New Government — Society Interactions. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE Publications.
Moore, J.A. (2001), ‘More than a food fight’, Issues in Science and Technology online. URL: http://www.nap.edu/issues/17.4/p_moore.htm.
Pierre, J. and B.G. Peters (2000), Governance, Politics and the State, Basingstoke, London: Macmillan Press.
Schmitter, P. (2002), ‘Participation in governance arrangements: Is there any reason to expect it will achieve “sustainable and innovative policies in a multilevel context?”’, in J.R. Grote and B. Gbikpi (eds.), Participatory Governance. Political and Societal Implications, Opladen: Leske + Budrich, pp. 51–69.
Steering Board of the Public Debate on GM (Genetic Modification) (2003), GM Nation? The Findings of the Public Debate. Report of the Steering Board of the Public Debate on GM (Genetic Modification) and GM Crops. URL: http://www.gmnation.org.uk.
Taylor, I. (ed.), (2004), Genetically Engineered Plants. Governance Under Uncertainty, Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.
URL: http://www.aebc.gov.uk.
URL: http://gmnation.org.uk.
Weldon, S. and B. Wynne (2001), The UK National Report. Assessing Debate and Participative Technology Assessment (ADAPTA). Final Report, Lancaster: Centre for the Study of Environmental Change, Lancaster University. See also ADAPTA final report at URL: http://www.inra.fr/_Internet/Directons/SED/science-governance/pub/ADAPTA/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Joss, S. (2005). Between Policy and Politics. In: Maasen, S., Weingart, P. (eds) Democratization of Expertise?. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, vol 24. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3754-6_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3754-6_10
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3753-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3754-2
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)