Skip to main content

Participatory Partnerships: Engaging and Empowering to Enhance Environmental Management and Quality of Life?

  • Chapter
Quality-of-Life Research in Chinese, Western and Global Contexts

Part of the book series: Social Indicators Research Series ((SINS,volume 25))

Abstract

It is generally believed that, when partnerships with civil society are created, members of the public become engaged in defining and solving problems, and as a result become empowered through enhanced understanding of substantive problems, and of the processes used by society to deal with them. In this context, two fundamental assumptions related to a partnership approach deserve examination. First, partnerships assume a shared vision among partners, and a willingness to work together in a spirit of collaboration and cooperation. However, humans often are competitive, protective and defensive, attributes unlikely to lead to collaboration and cooperation. Second, advocates of a participatory approach advocate, or assume, that citizens will become empowered through being part of a partnership process. If partnerships are to be encouraged, we need to know if such a transformation actually occurs. Two experiences in Canada, one dealing with shared decision making during a resource and land use management process in British Columbia, and the other focused on an environmental impact assessment process in Manitoba, provide evidence that challenges whether these assumptions are easily satisfied.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Burroughs, R.: 1999, ‘When stakeholders choose: process, knowledge and motivation in water quality decisions', Society and Natural Resources 12, pp. 329–341.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrm, D.S., S.W. Selin and M.A. Scott: 1998, ‘Managing public forests: Understanding the role of collaborative planning', Environmental Management 22, pp. 767–776.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Day, J.C., T.I. Gunton and T.M. Frame: 2003, ‘Toward environmental sustainability in British Columbia: The role of collaborative planning,', Environments 31(2), pp. 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diduck, A.: 1999,’ Critical education in resource and environmental management: Learning and empowerment for a sustainable future', Journal of Environmental Management 57, pp. 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diduck, A.P.: 2001, Learning Through Public Involvement in Environmental Assessment: A Transformative Perspective, Unpublished PhD dissertation (Department of Geography, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario).

    Google Scholar 

  • Diduck, A.P. and A.J. Sinclair: 2002, ‘Public participation in environmental assessment: The case of the nonparticipant', Environmental Management 29, pp. 578–588.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diduck, A.P. and B. Mitchell: 2003, ‘Learning, public involvement and environmental assessment: A Canadian case study', Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 5, pp. 339–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duros, C. and N. Watson: 2002, ‘Integrated land and water management in the United Kingdom: Narrowing the implementation gap', Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 45, pp. 403–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, J.L.: 2002, Empowerment Through Shared Decision Making: A Case Study of the Okanagan Shushwap Land Resource Management Planning Process, Unpublished PhD dissertaion (Department of Geography, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, B.: 1989, Collaborating: Finding Common Ground for Multiparty Problems (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimble, R. and M.-K. Chan: 1995, ‘Stakeholder analysis for natural resource management in developing countries: Some practical guidelines for making management more participatory and effective', Natural Resources Forum 19, pp. 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimble, R. and K. Wellard: 1997, ‘Stakeholder methodologies in natural resources management: A review of principles, contexts, experiences and opportunities', Agricultural Systems 55, pp. 173–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunton, T.I. and J.C. Day: 2003, ‘The theory and practice of collaborative planning in resource and environmental management', Environments 31(2), pp. 5–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haughton, G.: 2000, ‘Information and participation within environmental management', Environment and Urbanization 11, pp. 51–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healey, P.: 1997, Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies (University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver).

    Google Scholar 

  • Himmelman, A.T.: 1996, ‘On the theory and practice of transformational collaboration: from social service to social justice', in E. Huxham (ed.), Creating Collaborative Advantage (SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks CA), pp. 19–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J.E. and D.E. Boohr: 1999a, ‘Consensus building as role playing and bricolage: Towards a theory of participatory planning', Journal of the American Planning Association 65, pp. 9–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J.E. and D.E. Boohr: 1999b, ‘Consensus building and complex adaptive systems: A framework for evaluating collaborative planning', Journal of the American Planning Association 65, pp. 412–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, E.J.: 2001, ‘Collaborative visioning or urban planning as therapy? The politics of public-private policy making', Professional Geographer 53, pp. 207–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menegat, R.: 2002, ‘Participatory democracy and sustainable development: Integrated urban environmental management in Porta Alegre, Brazil', Environment and Urbanization 14, pp. 181–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michaels, S., R. Mason and W. Solecki: 1998, ‘Motivations for ecosteward partnerships: Examples from Adirondack Park', Land Use Policy 16, pp. 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, B.: 2002, Resource and Environmental Management, 2nd edition (Prentice Hall, Harlow, England).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohan, G. and K. Stokke: 2000, ‘Participatory development and empowerment: The dangers of localism', Third World Quarterly 21, pp. 247–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nanus, B.: 1992, Visionary Leadership (Jossey-Bass, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Sullivan, E.: 1999, Transformative Learning: Educational Vision for the 21st Century (University of Toronto Press, Toronto, and St. Martin's Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Palerm, J.R.: 2000, ‘An empirical-theoretical analysis framework for public participation in environmental impact assessment', Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 46, pp. 581–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulson, D.D.: 1998, ‘Collaborative management of public rangeland in Wyoming: Lessons in co-management', Professional Geographer 50, pp. 301–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Randolph, J. and M. Bauer: 1999, ‘Improving environmental decisionmaking through collaborative methods', Policy Studies Review 16(3/4), pp. 168–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selin, S. and D. Chavez: 1995, ‘Developing a collaborative model for environmental planning and management', Environmental Management 19, pp. 189–195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge, P.W.: 1994, The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization (Doubleday, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shipley, R.: 2000, ‘The origin and development of vision and visioning in planning', International Planning Studies 5, pp. 227–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipley, R. and R. Newkirk: 1999, ‘Vision and visioning: What do these terms really mean?', Environment and Planning B 26, pp. 573–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H.A: 1965, Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision-Making Processes in Administrative Organization, 2nd edition (Free Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J.M: 1993, ‘Future state visioning — a powerful leadership process', Long Range Planning 26, pp. 89–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viessman, W.: 1993, ‘The water management challenge', Water Resources Update 90 (Winter), pp. 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacker, C., A. Viaro and M. Wolf: 1999, ‘Partnerships for urban environmental management: roles of urban authorities, researchers and civil society', Environment and Urbanization 11, pp. 111–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mitchell, B. (2005). Participatory Partnerships: Engaging and Empowering to Enhance Environmental Management and Quality of Life?. In: Shek, D.T., Chan, Y.K., Lee, P.S. (eds) Quality-of-Life Research in Chinese, Western and Global Contexts. Social Indicators Research Series, vol 25. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3602-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics