Abstract
In this paper we motivate and report on the implementation of a computer experiment to investigate the syntax and semantics of linguistic constructions about time. It is argued that the way in which a domain like time is conceptualized is not universal and evolves over time. To investigate this we want to simulate a population of agents evolving their proper language and ontology of time in order to succeed in communicating temporal information. Such simulations can be done using a formalism proposed by Steels (2004). Some advances in applying the formalism to the domain of time are reported and examples of actual simulations are presented.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Belpaeme, T. 2001. Factors influencing the origins of colour categories. Unpublished PhD thesis. Brussels: Artificial Intelligence Lab—Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
Comrie, B. 1985. Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
De Beule, J. 2004. “Creating temporal categories for an ontology of time.” In: Proceedings of the 16th Belgian-Dutch Conference on Artificial Intelligence (BNAIC’04), pages 107–114; Rine KC Verbrugge & Niels Taatgen, L.S. (eds.)
De Boer, B. 2001. The origins of vowel systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Jong, E. 2000. Autonomous formation of concepts and communication. Unpublished PhD thesis. Brussel: Vrije Universiteit Brussel.
Kirby, S. and Hurford, J. 2001. “The emergence of linguistic structure: An overview of the iterated learning model.” In: Cangelosi, A.; and Parisi, D. (eds.), Simulating the evolution of language 121–148. London: Springer Verlag.
LaPolla, R.J. (n.d.). “Language as culture: The conventionalization of constraints on inference.” http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/215204.html.
Nunez, R.E. 1999. “Could the future taste purple?” In: Nunez, R.; and Freeman, W. (eds.), Reclaiming cognition: The primacy of action, intention and emotion 41–60. Thorverton: Imprint Academic.
Steels, L. 1998. “The origins of ontologies and communication conventions in multi-agent systems.” Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 1: 169–194.
Steels, L. 2004. “Constructivist development of grounded construction grammars.” In: Proceedings of the 42nd Assoc. for Comp. Linguistics Conference, Barcelona, Scott, D., Daelemans, W. and Walker M. (eds.), pages 308–312.
Steels, L.; and Kaplan, F. 2002. “AIBO’s first words: The social learning of language and meaning.” Evolution of Communication 4(1): 3–32.
Whorf, B.L. 1956. Language, thought and reality. Cambridge: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.
Yee, N. (n.d.a). “What Whorf really said.” http://www.nickyee.com/ponder/whorf.html.
Yee, N. (n.d.b). “Implications of language: Tone, tense and time.” http://www.nickyee.com/ponder/chinese.html.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
De Beule, J. (2006). Simulating the syntax and semantics of linguistic constructions about time. In: Gontier, N., Van Bendegem, J.P., Aerts, D. (eds) Evolutionary Epistemology, Language and Culture. Theory and Decision Library A:, vol 39. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3395-8_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3395-8_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-3394-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-4020-3395-7
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)