Skip to main content

Proof Style and Understanding in Mathematics I: Visualization, Unification and Axiom Choice

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Synthese Library ((SYLI,volume 327))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abhyankar, S. (1964). Local Analytic Geometry, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allwein, G. and Barwise, J. (1996). Logical Reasoning with Diagrams, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apostol, T. (1976). Introduction to Analytic Number Theory, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Artin, E. (1957). Geometric Algebra, Wiley Interscience, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assis, A. (1994). Weber’s Electrodynamics, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atiyah, M. (1984). Interview with Michael Atiyah, Mathematical Intelligencer 6(1). Page references to the reprinting in (Atiyah, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Atiyah, M. (1988). Collected Works vol.1, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babbage, C. (1827). On the Influence of Signs in Mathematical Reasoning, Trans-actions of the Cambridge Philosophical Society II: 325–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, H. (1929). Principles of Geometry vol. I Foundations, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batten, L. (1997). Combinatorics of Finite Geometries, 2nd edn, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batterman, R. (2000). A ‘Modern’ (Victorian) Attitude Towards Scientific Understanding, The Monist 83(2): 228–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batterman, R. (2002). The Devil is in the Details: Asymptotic Reasoning in Explanation, Reduction and Emergence, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benvenuto, E. (1991). An Introduction to the History of Structural Mechanics Part II: Vaulted Systems and Elastic Structures, Springer — Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, N. (1981). Imagery, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, L. M. (1961). A Modern View of Geometry, W. H. Freeman and Co., San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, J. (1873). A Treatise on Some New Geometrical Methods, Vol. I and II, Long-man Green, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottazini, U. (1986). The Higher Calculus: A History of Real and Complex Analysis from Euler to Weierstrass, Springer, Berlin. W. van Egmund (trans.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottazini, U. (1994). Three Traditions in Complex Analysis: Cauchy, Riemann and Weierstrass, in I. Grattan-Guinness (ed.), Companion Encyclopedia of the History and Philosophy of the Mathematical Sciences, Vol. I, Routledge, London, pp. 419–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, G. (1972). Mental Imagery and Associative Learning, in L. Gregg (ed.), Cognition in Learning and Memory, Wiley, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgeman, P. (1938). The Logic of Modern Physics, McMillan, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butts, R. (1973). Whewell’s Logic of Induction, in R. Giere and R. Westfall (eds), Foundation of Scientific Method: Nineteenth Century, Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 53–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, N. (1919/1957). Foundations of Science, Dover, New York. 1957 reprint of 1919 original.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbone, A. and Semmes, S. (2000). A Graphic Apology for Symmetry and Explicitness, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, M. (1990). The Book of Memory: A Study of Memory in Medieval Culture, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, M. (1998). The Craft of Thought, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartier, P. (2001). A Mad Day’s Work: From Grothendieck to Connes and Kontse-vich, the Evolution of the Concepts of Space and Symmetry, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 38(4): 389–408.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cartwright, N. (1983). How the Laws of Physics Lie, Clarendon Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casati, R. and Varzi, A. (1994). Holes and other Superficialities, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casorati, F. (1868). Teorica dellefunzioni di variabili complex, Pavia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlton, T. (1982). A History of the Theory of Structures in the Nineteenth Century, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chasles, M. (1837). Aperçu historique sur l’origine et le développement des méthodes en géométrie, particulièrement de celles qui se rapportent à la géometrie moderne, suivi d’un mémoire de géométrie sur deux principles généreaux de la science, la dualité et l’homographie, M. Hayez, Bruxelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevalley, C. (1951). Introduction to the Theory of Algebraic Functions of One Variable, American Mathematical Society, Reinhart and Wilson, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, G. (1888). The Principles of Graphic Statics, 2nd edn, E. & F. N. Spon, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clemens, C. (1980). A Scrapbook of Complex Curve Theory, Plenum Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coolidge, J. (1959). A Treatise on Algebraic Plane Curves, Dover, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Courant, R. and Robbins, H. (1941). What is Mathematics?, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, D., Little, J. and O’Shea, D. (1992). Ideals, Varieties and Algorithms: An Introduction to Computational Algebraic Geometry, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coxeter, H. (1992). The Real Projective Plane, 3rd edn, Springer, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crapo, H. and Whiteley, W. (1982). Statics of Frameworks and Motions of Panel Structures: A Projective Geometric Introduction, Structural Topology 6: 43–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremona, L. (1872). Le figure reciproche nella statica grafica, Hoepli, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremona, L. (1874). Elementi di calcolo grafico, Paravia, Torino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cremona, L. (1890). Graphical statics. Two treatises on the graphical calculus and reciprocal figures in graphical statics, Oxford University Press, Oxford. English translation of (Cremona, 1872) and (Cremona, 1874) by Thomas Beare, with a new preface by Cremona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crotti, F. (1888). La teoria dell’elasticità ne’ suoi principifondamentali e nelle sue applicazioni pratiche alle costruzioni, Hoepli, Milan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culmann, K. (1865). Die Graphische Statik, Meyer and Zeller, Zürich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culmann, K. (1875). Die Graphische Statik, 2nd edn, Meyer and Zeller, Zürich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darrigol, O. (2000). Electrodynamics from Ampère to Einstein, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dedekind, R. and Weber, H. (1882). Theorie der algebraischen Funktionen einer Verlnderlichen, Journal für Reine und Angewante Mathematik 92: 181–290. Dated 1880, page reference to the reprinting in Dedekind’s Werke vol. I 238–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demopoulos, W. (ed.) (1995). Frege’s Philosophy of Mathematics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieudonné, J. (1969). Linear Algebra and Geometry, Hermann, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dieudonné, J. (1985). History of Algebraic Geometry, Wadsworth Books, Monterey. J.Sally, (trans.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, A. (1877). The Elements of Graphical Statics and their Application to Framed Structures, Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dugac, P. (1976). Richard Dedekind et les Fondements des Mathématique, Vrin, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earman, J. (1992). Bayes or Bust: A Critical Examination of Bayesian Confirmation Theory, MIT press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, H. (1996). Linear Algebra, Birkhäuser, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenbud, J. and Harris, J. (1992). Schemes: The Language of Modern Algebraic Geometry, Wadsworth and Cole, Pacific Grove, Ca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenbud, J. and Harris, J. (2000). The Geometry of Schemes, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, E. (1992). Engineering and the Mind’s Eye, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, J. V. (1987). Linear perspective and the projective geometry of Girard Desargues, Nuncius Ann. Storia Sci. 2(2): 3–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, J. V. (1988). Perspective and the Mathematicians: Alberti to Desargues, in C. Hay (ed.), Mathematics from Manuscript to Print, 1300–1600, Oxford Sci. Publ., Oxford Univ. Press, New York, pp. 236–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, J. V. (1997). The Invention of Infinity, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Field, J. V. and Gray, J. J. (1987). The Geometrical Work of Girard Desargues, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. (1903). Grundgesetze der Arithmetik, Vol. II, H. Pohle, Jena.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frege, G. (1980). Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Gabriel, G. Hermes, H. Kambartel, E Thiel, C and Veraart, A. Abridged from the German edition by McGuinness, B. Translated by Kaal, H.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1974). Explanation and Scientific Understanding, Journal of Philosophy 73: 250–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1979). Truth and Confirmation, Journal of Philosophy 76: 361–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (2000). Geometry, Construction and Intuition in Kant and his Successors, in G. Sher and R. Tieszen (eds), Between Logic and Intuition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 186–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaukroger, S. (1995). Descartes: A Critical Biography, Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geyer, W. (1981). Die Theorie der Algebraischen Funktionen einer Veränderlichen nach Dedekind und Weber, in W. Scharlau (ed.), Richard Dedekind, 1831–1981: eine Würdigung zu seinem 150 Geburtstag, F Vieweg, Braunschweig, Wiesbaden, pp. 109–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasgow, J., Narayanan, H. and Chandrasekaran, B. (eds) (1995). Diagrammatic Reasoning, MIT Press, Cambridge Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N. (1955). Fact, Fiction and Forecast, Bobbs — Merrill, Indianapolis. 1965 Reprint.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, R. (1887). Graphic and Analytic Statics in their Practical Application to the Treatment of Stresses in Roofs, Solid Girders, Lattice, Bowstring and Suspension Bridges, Braced Iron Arches and Piers, and other Frameworks, 2nd edn, Crosby Lockwood and Co., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, J. (1998). The Riemann-Roch Theorem and Geometry 1854–1914, International Congress of Mathematicians Proceedings, Vol. III, pp. 811–822.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grünbaum, B. (1976). Lectures in lost mathematics. Unpublished mimeographed notes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, M. (1943). Projective planes, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 54: 229–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. (1992). Developments in Algebraic Geometry, Proceedings of the AMS Centennial Symposium, American Mathematical Society Publications, Providence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, R. (1967). Foundations of Projective Geometry, Benjamin Press, Cambridge. Lecture Notes Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, R. (2000). Geometry: Euclid and Beyond, Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennenberg, E. (1903). Die graphische Statik der starren Körper, Encyklopiidie der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, Vol. IV(1), pp. 345–435.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, M. (1961). Forces and Fields, Thomas Nelson and Sons, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert, D. (1899). Die Grundlagen der Geometrie, 1st ed. in Festschrift zur Feier der Enthiillung der Gauss-Weber-Denkmals in Göttingen,Teubner, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, D. R. and Piper, F. C. (1973). Projective Planes, Vol. 6 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphries, P. (1993). Greater Unification equals Greater Understanding?, Analysis 53.3: 183–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, J. and Wirtz, H. (1983). Schaum’s Outline of Theory and Problems of Elementary Statics and Strength of Materials, McGraw — Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, N. (1974). Basic Algebra, Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jans, J. (1957). Review of (Artin, 1957), American Mathematical Monthly pp. 604–605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kadison, L. and Kromann, M. (1996). Projective Geometry and Modern Algebra, Birkhäuser, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J. (1994). Explanatory Knowledge and Metaphysical Dependence, Philosophical Issues 5: 51–69. Truth and Rationality.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P. (1976). Explanation, Conjunction and Unification, Journal of Philosophy 73: 207–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P. (1982). Explanatory unification, Philosophy of Science 48: 507–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher, P. (1989). Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World, in P. Kitcher and W. Salmon (eds), Scientific Explanation, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, F. (1926/79). Development of mathematics in the 19th century, Vol. IX of Lie Groups: History, Frontiers and Applications, Math Sci Press, Brookline, Mass. With a preface and appendices by Robert Hermann, translated from the German by M. Ackerman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1977). Objectivity, Value Judgement and Theory Choice, in The Essential Tension, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laugwitz, D. (1992). ‘Das letzte Ziel ist immer die Darstellung einer Funktion’: Grundlagen der Analysis bei Weierstraß 1886 historische Wurzeln und Parallelen, Historia Mathematica 19: 341–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laugwitz, D. (1999). Bernhard Riemann: 1826–1866 Turning Points in the Conception of Mathematics, Birkhäuser, Boston. A. Schnitzer (trans.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancosu, P. (1999). Bolzano and Cournot on Mathematical Explanation, Revue d’Histoire des Sciences 52: 429–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. C. (1864). On the Calculation of the Equilibrium and Stiffness of Frames, Philosophical Magazine 27: 294–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, M. (1997). Whewell and the Ultimate Problem of Philosophy, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 28: 315–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, M. (2000). Unifying Scientific Theories, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, D. (1988). The Big Red Book of Varieties and Schemes, Springer — Verlag, Berlin. Springer Lecture Notes in Mathematics: 1358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuenschwander, E. (1980). Riemann und das ‘Weierstrass’schen Prinzip’ der analytischen Fortsetzung durch Potenzreihen, Jahresbericht der Deutschen Mathematiker-Vereinigung 82: 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuenschwander, E. (1981). Studies in the History of Complex Function Theory II: Interactions among the French School, Riemann, and Weierstrass, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 5: 87–105. New series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, H. (1898). L’Oeuvre Mathmmatique de Weierstrass, Acta Mathematica 22: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poincaré, H. (1903). Review of Hilbert’s Foundations of Geometry, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society pp. 1–23. E. Huntington, trans., original, published 1902.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, I. and Lemon, O. (1997). Spatial Logic and the Complexity of Diagrammatic Reasoning, Machine Graphics and Vision 6(1): 89–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Railton, P. (1993). Essentially General Predicates, in P. French, T. Uehling and H. Wettstein (eds), Philosophy of Science, Vol. XVII of Midwest Studies in Philosophy, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 166–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankine, T. (1869). On the Practical Application of Reciprocal Figures to the Calculation of Strains on Frameworks, Vol. XXV of Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reisenfeld, R. (1981). Homogeneous Coordinates and Projective Planes in Computer Graphics, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 1(1): 50–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remmert, R. (1991). Theory of Complex Functions, Springer Verlag, Berlin. R. Burkel (trans.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Remmert, R. (1998). Classical Topics in Complex Function Theory, Springer Verlag, Berlin. L. Kay (trans.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossi, P. (2000). Logic and the Art of Memory: the Quest for a Universal Language, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. S. Clucas (trans.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rota, G.-C. (1997). Indiscrete Thoughts, Birkhäuser, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salmon, W. (1989). Forty Years of Scientific Explanation, in P. Kitcher and W. Salmon (eds), Scientific Explanation, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, E. (1989). Symmetrie Gruppe Dualität, Birkhauser, Basel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholz, E. (1994). Graphical Statics, in I. Grattan-Guinness (ed.), Companion Encyclopedia of the History and Philosophy of the Mathematical Sciences, Vol. II, Routledge, London, pp. 987–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segre, C. (1904). On Some Tendencies in Geometrical Investigations, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society pp. 412–468. J. Young (Trans.), Italian original published 1891 in Revista di Matematica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K. E., Kahanpää, L., Kekäläinen, P. and Traves, W. (2000). An invitation to algebraic geometry, Universitext, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, K., Kahanpää, L., Kekäläinen, P. and Traves, W. (2001). An Invitation to Algebraic Geometry, Springer, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, H. (1988). Logos, Logic and Logistiké: Some Philosophical Remarks on the Nineteenth-Century Transformation of Mathematics, in W. Aspray and P. Kitcher (eds), History and Philosophy of Modern Mathematics, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp. 238–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, M. (1978). Mathematical Explanation, Philosophical Studies 34: 135–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stillwell, J. (1993). Classical Topology and Combinatorial Group Theory, 2nd edn, Springer Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolfi, J. (1991). Oriented Projective Geometry: A Framework for Geometric Computations, Academic Press, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tappenden, J. (1995). Geometry and Generality in Frege’s Philosophy of Arithmetic, Synthise 102: 319–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tappenden, J. (2001a). “Geometrical Invariance and Mathematical Practice in Frege’s Foundations of Geometry”. In preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tappenden, J. (2001b). “Proof Style and Understanding in Mathematics II: Notation”. In preparation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tappenden, J. (2001c). A Reassessment of the Mathematical Roots of Frege’s Logicism I: The Riemannian Context of Frege’s Foundations. (Working title) manuscript in progress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timoshenko, S. (1953). History of the Strength of Materials, Dover Publications, New York. 1983 reprint.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. (1961). Foresight and Understanding, Harper and Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truesdell, C. (1984). An Idiot’s Fugitive Essays on Science, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E. (1983). The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, Graphics Press, Cheshire, Conn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufte, E. (1997). Visual Explanations, Graphics Press, Cheshire, Conn.

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Waerden, B. (1991). Algebra, Vol. II, Springer, New York. Translated by J. Schulenberger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyl, H. (1913). Die Idee Der Riemannschen Fliiche, Teubner, Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyl, H. (1932). Topologie und Abstrakte Algebra als zwei Wege mathematischen Verständnisses, Unterrichtsblätter für Mathematik und Maturwissenschaften 38: 177–188. Gesammelte Abhandlungen vol. 3 pp. 348–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyl, H. (1955). The Concept of A Riemann Surface, Addison — Wesley, Reading, Mass. English translation of 3rd revised edition of (Weyl, 1913), G. Maclane, trans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weyl, H. (1995). Topology and Abstract Algebra as Two Roads of Mathematical Comprehension, American Mathematical Monthly pp. 453–460 and 646 — 651. Abe Shenitzer, trans., A translation of (Weyl, 1932).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteley, W. (1985). The Projective Geometry of Rigid Frameworks, in C. Baker and L. Batten (eds), Finite Geometries, Marcel Dekker, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. (1992). Frege: The Royal Road From Geometry, Noas 26: 149–180. Page references to the reprinting in (Demopoulos, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, F. (1966). The Art of Memory, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zariski, O. (1978). Collected Papers, Vol. III, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass. Edited by M. Artin and B. Mazur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziwet, A. (1904). Theoretical Mechanics, Norwood Press, Norwood, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tappenden, J. (2005). Proof Style and Understanding in Mathematics I: Visualization, Unification and Axiom Choice. In: Mancosu, P., Jørgensen, K.F., Pedersen, S.A. (eds) Visualization, Explanation and Reasoning Styles in Mathematics. Synthese Library, vol 327. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3335-4_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics