Skip to main content

Muscular system in polychaetes (Annelida)

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Developments in Hydrobiology ((DIHY,volume 179))

Abstract

The structure of the polychaete muscular system is reviewed. The muscular system comprises the muscles of the body wall, the musculature of the parapodial complex and the muscle system of the dissepiments and mesenteries. Various types of organisation of the longitudinal and circular components of the muscular body wall are distinguished. In Opheliidae, Polygordiidae, Protodrilidae, Spionidae, Oweniidae, Aphroditidae, Acoetidae (=Polyodontidae), Polynoidae, Sigalonidae, Phyllodocidae, Nephtyidae, Pisionidae, and Nerillidae circular muscles are lacking. It is hypothesised that the absence of circular muscles represents the plesiomorphic state in Annelida. This view contradicts the widely accepted idea of an earthworm-like musculature of the body wall comprising an outer layer of circular and an inner layer of longitudinal fibres. A classification of the various types of parapodial muscle construction has been developed. Massive and less manoeuvrable parapodia composed of many components like those of Aphrodita are regarded to represent the plesiomorphic state in recent polychaetes. An analysis of the diversity of the muscular structure supports the hypothesis that the primary mode of life in polychaetes was epibenthic and the parapodial chaetae had a protective function.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Brown, R. S., 1938. The anatomy of the polychaete Ophelia cluthensis McGuire, 1935. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 58: 135–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brusca, R. C. & G. J. Brusca, 1990. Invertebrates. Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, 922 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. B., 1964. Dynamics in Metazoan Evolution. The Origin of the Coelom and Segments. Clarendon, Oxford, 313 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, R. B., 1981. Locomotion and the phylogeny of the Metazoa. Bolletino di Zoologica 48: 11–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorsett, D. A., 1961. The behavior of Polydora ciliata (Johnst.). Tube building and burrowing. Journal of the marine biological association of the United Kingdom 41: 577–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eguileor, M. & R. Valvassori, 1977. Studies on the helical and paramyosinic muscles. VII. Fine structure if the body wall muscles in Sipunculus nudus. Journal of Submicroscopic Cytology 9: 393–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, S. L., 1992. Polychaeta: General organisation, integument, musculature, coelom, and vascular system. In Harrison, F. W. & S. L. Gardiner (eds), Microscopic Anatomy of Invertebrates. Vol. 7: Annelida. Wiley-Liss, New York: 19–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner, S. L. & R. M. Rieger, 1980. Rudimentary cilia and muscle cells of annelids and echinoderms. Cell and Tissue Research 213: 247–252.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann-Schröder, G., 1958. Zur Morphologie der Opheliiden (Polychaeta Sedentaria). Zeitschrift fuür wissenschaftliche Zoologie 161: 84–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, C. O., 1969. The systematic position of the Archiannelida. Systematic Zoology 18: 85–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochberg, R. & M. K. Litvaitis, 2001. Functional morphology of muscles in Tetranchyroderma papii (Gastrotricha). Zoomorphology 121: 37–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, I., in press. Ultrastructure of secondary body cavity of family Phyllodocidae (Annelida, Polychaeta).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ivanov, I. & A. Tzetlin, 1997. Fine structure of body cavity of Phyllodocidae (Annelida, Polychaeta). Morphofunctional analysis. Doklady Akademia NAUK 354: 272–277 (in Russian).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, K. E., 1927. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Polychaeten-Familien Hermellidae, Sabellidae uns Serpulidae. Zoologiska Bidrag fran Uppsala 11: 1–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jouin, C. & B. Swedmark, 1965. Paranerilla limnicola n. g., n. sp., Archiannélide Nerillidae du benthos vaseux marin. Cahiers de Biologie Marine 6: 201–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanzavecchia, G., M. Eguileor & R. Valvassori, 1988. Muscles. In: Westheide, W. & C. O. Hermans (eds), The Ultrastructure of Polychaeta. Microfauna Marina 4: 71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden, J. R. & T. Lacalli, 1978. Morphology of the benthic larva of Arenicola cristata (Polychaeta). Canadian Journal of Zoology 56: 224–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattisson, A. G. M., 1969. The ultrastructure of the parapodial muscles of the spawning male of Autolytus (Syllidae, Polychaeta). Arkiv för Zoologi 22: 201–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, D., 1997. Molecular evidence that echiurans and pogonophorans are derived annelids. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 94: 8006–8009.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, W. C., 1917. On the nervous system and other points in the structure of Owenia and Myriochele. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 19: 233–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mettam, C., 1967. Segmental musculature and parapodial movement of Nereis diversicolor and Nephthys hombergi (Annelida: Polychaeta). Journal of Zoology (London) 153:245–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mettam, C., 1971. Functional design and evolution of the polychaete Aphrodite aculeata. Journal of Zoology (London) 163: 489–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mettam, C., 1985. Constraints in the evolution of the Annelida. In Conway Morris, S., D. J. George, R. Gibson & H. M. Platt (eds), The Origins and Relationships of Lower Invertebrates. Clarendon, Oxford: 297–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, E., 1887. Studien über den Körperbau der Anneliden. Mitteilungen aus der zoologischen Station zu Neapel 7: 592–741.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, E., 1888. Studien über den Körperbau der Anneliden. IV. Die Körperform der Serpulaceen und Hermellen. Mitteilungen aus der zoologischen Station zu Neapel 8: 462–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller, M. C. M. & A. Schmidt-Rhaesa, 2003. Reconstruction of the muscle system in Antygomonas sp. (Kinorhyncha, Cyclorhagia) by means of phalloidin labeling and cLSM. Journal of Morphology 256: 103–110.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Orrhage, L., 1962. Über das Vorkommen von Muskelzellen vom ‘Nematoden-Typus’ bei Polychaeten als phylogenetisch-systematisches Merkmal. Zoologiska Bidrag fran Uppsala 35: 321–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orrhage, L., 1964. Anatomische und morphologische Studien über die Polychaetenfamilien Spionidae, Disomidae und Poecilochaetidae. Zoologiska Bidrag fran Uppsala 36: 335–405.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purschke, G., 2002. On the ground pattern of Annelida. Organisms, Diversity and Evolution 2: 181–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieger, R. M., 1991. Neue Organisationsformen aus der Sandlückenfauna: die Lobatocerebriden und Jennaria pulchra. Verhandlungen der Deutschen Zoologischen Gesellschaft 84: 247–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieger, R. M., W. Salvenmoser, A. Legniti & S. Tyler, 1994. Phalloidin-rhodamine preparations of Macrstomum hystricinum marinum (Plathelminthes): morphology and postembryonic development of the musculature. Zoomorphology 114: 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, G. W. & K. Fauchald, 1995. The articulation of annelids. Zoologica Scripta 24: 269–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, G. W. & K. Fauchald, 1997. Cladistics and Polychaetes. Zoologica Scripta 26: 139–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salensky, W., 1907. Morphogenetische Studien an Würmern. Mémoires de l’Académie Impériale des Sciences de St.-Pétersbourg. VIII. Serie. Classe Physico-Mathématque 19: 1–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storch, V., 1968. Zur vergleichenden Anatomie der segmentalen Muskelsysteme und zur Verwandtschaft der Polychaeten-Familien. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Ökologie der Tiere 63: 251–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storch, V. & U. Welsch, 1986. Systematische Zoologie. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart, 698 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzetlin, A., 1987. Structural peculiarities of Pisionidens tchesunovi (Polychaeta) and their possible significance. Zoologisceskij Zurnal 66: 1454–1462 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzetlin, A., T. Dahlgren & G. Purschke, 2002a. Ultrastructure of the body wall, body cavity, nephridia and spermatozoa in four species of the Chrysopetalidae (Annelida, “Polychaeta”). Zoologischer Anzeiger 241: 37–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tzetlin, A., A. Zhadan, I. Ivanov, M. C. M. Müller & G. Purschke, 2002b. On the absence of circular muscle elements in the body wall of Dysponetus pygmaeus (Chrysopetalidae, “Polychaeta”, Annelida). Acta Zoologica (Stockholm) 83: 81–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ushakov, P. V., 1972. Fauna of the USSR. Polychaetes. Academy of the Sciences of the USSR, Zoological Institute 102:1–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanninger, A., B. Ruthensteiner, S. Lobenwein, W. Salvenmoser, W. J. A. G. Dictus & G. Haszprunar, 1999. Development of the musculature in the limpet Patella (Mollusca, Patellogastropoda). Development, Genes and Evolution 209: 226–238.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. P., 1944. The parapodia of Arenicola marina L. (Polychaeta). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 114: 100–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. P., 1950. The anatomy of the body wall and appendages in Arenicola marina L., Arenicola claparedii Levinsen and Arenicola ecaudata Johnston. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 29: 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. P., 1952. The proboscis apparatus of Arenicola. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 31: 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. P., 1954. The mechanism of proboscis movement in Arenicola. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 95: 251–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheide, W., 1997. The direction of evolution within Polychaeta. Journal of Natural History 31: 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheide, W. & R. M. Rieger, 1996. Spezielle Zoologie. Erster Teil: einzeller und Wirbellose. Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart: 1–909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westheide, W. & C. Watson Russel, 1992. Ultrastructure of chrysopetalid paleal chaetae (Annelida, Polychaeta). Acta Zoologica (Stockholm) 73: 197–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westheide, W., D. McHugh, G. Purschke & G. W. Rouse, 1999. Systematization of the Annelida: different approaches. Hydrobiologia 402: 291–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhadan, A. & A. Tzetlin, in press. Comparative study of the diaphragm (gular membrane) in Terebellida (Polychaeta, Annelida).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tzetlin, A.B., Filippova, A.V. (2005). Muscular system in polychaetes (Annelida). In: Bartolomaeus, T., Purschke, G. (eds) Morphology, Molecules, Evolution and Phylogeny in Polychaeta and Related Taxa. Developments in Hydrobiology, vol 179. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3240-4_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics