Skip to main content

Effective Communication of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Data by Pathologists to Clinicians

  • Conference paper
Updates in Diagnostic Pathology

Part of the book series: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology ((AEMB,volume 563))

  • 1072 Accesses

Abstract

Despite predictions in the mid-twentieth century that bacterial and viral diseases would be wiped out by the year 2000, microbial infections in the early years of twenty-first century have remained major causes of morbidity and mortality. The emergence and spread of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria in the hospital environment, and more recently in community settings, augmented by frequent reports in the lay press, has heightened the awareness of primary care physicians as well as specialists in the importance of surveillance for antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, and that the administration of antimicrobial chemotherapy should be guided by in vitro susceptibility data whenever possible. The increased attention focused on microbiology data by clinicians has a secondary effect in that it mandates involvement of the clinical pathologist as a leader in how laboratory information is obtained and communicated to physicians in the most accurate, timely, and effective manner. Keeping abreast of the epidemiologic trends in antimicrobial resistance locally and nationally, maintaining awareness of current guidelines and recommendations for susceptibility testing, communication of data in an understandable format, and regular interactions with clinicians require considerable time allotment by the pathologist in order to ensure optimum patient management and fiscal responsibility to the hospital or laboratory that generates the data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anonymous. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Fourteenth Informational Supplement, NCCLS Document M100-S-14, vol. 23. Wayne, PA: National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schentag JJ, Ballow CH, Fritz AL, et al., Changes in antimicrobial agent usage resulting from interactions among clinical pharmacy, the infectious disease division, and the microbiology laboratory. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 16(3), 255–64 (1993).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hardy DJ, Hulbert BB, Migneault PC, Time to detection of positive BacT/Alert blood cultures and lack of need for routine subculture of 5-to 7-day negative cultures. J Clin Microbiol, 30(10), 2743–5 (1992).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilson ML, Introduction. Clinics in Laboratory Medicine, 14(1–7) (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Arbique J, Forward K, Haldane D, Davidson R, Comparison of the Velogene Rapid MRSA Identification Assay, Denka MRSA-Screen Assay, and BBL Crystal MRSA ID System for rapid identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 40(1–2), 5–10 (2001).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Carbon C, Costs of treating infections caused by methicillin-resistant staphylococci and vancomycinresistant enterococci. J Antimicrob Chemother, 44Suppl A(31–6 (1999).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Siberry GK, Tekle T, Carroll K, Dick J, Failure of clindamycin treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus expressing inducible clindamycin resistance in vitro. Clin Infect Dis, 37(9), 1257–60 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Naimi TS, LeDell KH, Como-Sabetti K, et al., Comparison of community-and health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. Jama, 290(22), 2976–84 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Appleman MD, Citron DM, Kwok R, Evaluation of the Velogene genomic assay for detection of vanA and vanB genes in vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus species. J Clin Microbiol, 42(4), 1751–2 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Anonymous, Staphylococcus aureus with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin—United States, 1997. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 46(33), 765–6 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chavers LS, Moser SA, Benjamin WH, et al., Vancomycin-resistant enterococci: 15 years and counting. J Hosp Infect, 53(3), 159–71 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Anonymous, From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus—Pennsylvania, 2002. Jama, 288(17), 2116 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Anonymous, From the Centers for Disease Control. Staphylococcus aureus resistant to vancomycin—United States, 2002. Jama, 288(7), 824–5 (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tenover FC, Swenson JM, O’Hara CM, Stocker SA, Ability of commercial and reference antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods to detect vancomycin resistance in enterococci. J Clin Microbiol, 33(6), 1524–7 (1995).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tenover FC, Weigel LM, Appelbaum PC, et al., Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolate from a patient in Pennsylvania. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 48(1), 275–80 (2004).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacoby GA, Epidemiology of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. Clin Infect Dis, 27(1), 81–3 (1998).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sturenburg E, Mack D, Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases: implications for the clinical microbiology laboratory, therapy, and infection control. J Infect, 47(4), 273–95 (2003).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Jacoby GA, Extended-spectrum beta-lactamases and other enzymes providing resistance to oxyimino-betalactams. Infect Dis Clin North Am, 11(4), 875–87 (1997).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this paper

Cite this paper

Waites, K.B. (2005). Effective Communication of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Data by Pathologists to Clinicians. In: Chhieng, D.C., Siegal, G.P. (eds) Updates in Diagnostic Pathology. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, vol 563. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-32025-3_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics