Conclusion
The above illustrated case-factors are the products of the globalization process affecting water security situation in the Aral Sea basin, and they will continue to contribute to shape the future of water politics in the Aral Sea basin. If to look through the prism of water security issues than it appears that globalization has, in many respects, negative implications for the development of downstream countries in the basin. Economic development of these countries is largely predetermined by further progresses achieved in agricultural sector, whose further improvement, in turn, depends on sustainable and guaranteed water delivery. At the national level, the significance of water’s role in the economy is readily illustrated by the comparison of the gross figures for the proportions of water used in various sectors of an economy and the relevant GDP figures. In the Aral Sea Basin, agricultural sector consumes 85% of water and generates close to 30% of the GDP. Moreover, it creates jobs for overwhelming majority of the working population whose very livelihoods and their quality depend on incomes generated in the sector. This makes us to conclude that it is crucial achieve and ensure that any decisions regarding major water management investments affecting overall water management regime must be made with the full participation of all riparian countries; otherwise this will undermine trust and the foundation of regional cooperation in the sphere. Ultimately, Central Asian leadership should recognize the limitations to the extra-regional forces in the dynamics of water politics and must give consideration to them in their strategic planning and decision-making.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Afghanistan Interim Authority, National Programme for Reconstruction, National Water Resources Investment Sub-Programme, available at http://www.export.gov/afghanistan/index.html.
Agreement Between the Governments of the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and the Republic of Uzbekistan on the Use of Water and Energy Resources of the Syr Darya Basin, 17 March 1998
Akhmedov U, 2001. “Liberalization possibilities in water management of the Republic of Uzbekistan” Tashkent Institute of Irrigation and Land Reclamation, 2001
Dukhovny, V.A. 2002 “Report on Project Inception Phase”. Project “Integrated Water Resources Management in Ferghana Valley”. January, Tashkent: ICWC.
Gazeta.Ru, 2003. Kanal imeni Yu.M.Lujkova (A Canal named after Yuriy Lujkov), 4 February 2003, available at http://www.gazeta.ru/print/2003/12/04/luikovpredla.shtml.
Government of Kyrgyzstan, 2001. Zakon Kyrgyzskoy Respubliki o mejgosudarstvennom ispolzovanii vodnykh obyektov, vodnykh resursov i vodokhozyaistvennih soorujenii Kyrgyzskoy Respubliki (Law on Interstate Use of Water Bodies, Water Resources and Water Structures of the Kyrgyz Republic), 23 July 2001, available at http://www.dundee.ac/uk/law/iwlri/Research_Documents_National.html. President Askar Akayev signed the law into effect on July 23, 2001.
Helsinki Rules on the Uses of the Waters of International Rivers, 1996. 52 Int’l L. Ass’n 484 (1966); UNECE Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes (Helsinki), 17 March 1992, 31 I.L.M. 1312 (entered into force October 6 1996).
Heltzer G. 2003. Stalemate in the Aral Sea Basin: Will Kyrgyzstan’s New Water Law Bring the Downstream Nations Back to the Multilateral Bargaining Table? Georgetown International Environmental Law Review. Vol 15(2): 291–320.
Mukhamadiev, B. What will be the impacts of Afghanistan’s increased water utilization on downstream States? (Unpublished working paper on file with author).
RAO-UESR Press Release from 18.09.03, available at http/www.ao-ees.ru/rii/news/pr/prl80903post.htm.
Sievers E. 2001. The Caspian, Regional Sea and the Case for a Cultural Study of Law, 13 Geo. Int’l Envtl. L. Rev. 361 (2001).
SIC IC. 2002. Dialogue on Water and Climate: The Aral Sea Basin Case Study (2002). SIC IC WC Project No 12.130.021
UN-ESCAP 2003. Managing Globalization in Selected Countries of Central Asia, Publication of the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP), UNP ST/ESCAP/2274 (2003)
World Bank Operational Manual, 2001. Operational Policies, Projects on International Waterways, OP 7.50 (June 2001, Washington D.C.)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mukhamadiev, B., Akhmedov, U. (2006). Globalization, Water and Changing Policies in the Aral Sea Basin. In: Babu, S.C., Djalalov, S. (eds) Policy Reforms and Agriculture Development in Central Asia. Natural Resource Management and Policy, vol 28. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29779-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29779-0_7
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-29777-4
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-29779-8
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)