Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ductal Carcinoma In Situ

  • Chapter
Book cover Breast MRI

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Dershaw DD, Abramson A, Kinne DW. Ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic findings and clinical implications. Radiology 1989;170:411–415.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Recht A, Rutgers EJT, Fentiman IS, et al. The fourth EORTC DCIS consensus meeting-conference report. Eur J Cancer. 1998;34:1664–1669.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Stomper PC, Connolly JL, Meyer JE, et al. Clinically occult ductal carcinoma in situ detected with mammography: analysis of 100 cases with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1989;172:235–241.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Griff SK, Dershaw DD. Breast cancer. In: Bragg DG, Rubin P, Hricak H, ed. Oncologic Imaging. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2002:265–294.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Page DL, Dupont WD, Rogers LW, et al. Intraductal carcinoma of the breast: follow-up after biopsy only. Cancer 1982;49:751–758.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Holland R, Hendriks JHCL. Microcalcifications associated with ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic-pathologic correlation. Semin Diagn Pathol. 1994;11:181–192.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Holland R, Veling SH, Mravunac M, et al. Histologic multi-focality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas. Implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer 1985;56:979–990.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Dinkel HP, Gassel AM, Tschammler A. Is the appearance of microcalcifications on mammography useful in predicting histological grade of malignancy in ductal cancer in situ? Br J Radiol. 2000;73:938–944.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Evans A, Pinder S, Wilson R, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic and pathologic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162:1307–1311.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Slanetz PJ, Giardino AA, Oyama T, et al. Mammographic appearance of ductal carcinoma in situ does not reliably predict histologic subtype. Breast J. 2001;7:417–421.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Orel SG, Schnall MD, Powell CM, et al. Staging of suspected breast cancer: effect of MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy. Radiology 1995;196:115–122.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Gilles R, Meunier M, Lucidarme O, et al. Clustered breast microcalcifications: evaluation by dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MRI. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1996;20:9–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Lucidarme O, et al. Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 1994;191:625–631.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1993;187:493–501.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Stomper PC, Herman S, Klippenstein DL, et al. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features. Radiology 1995;197:387–395.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Heywang SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, et al. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology 1989;171:95–103.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Boetes C, Mus RDM, Holland R, et al. Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology 1995;197:743–747.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Hulka CA, Smith BL, Sgroi DC, et al. Benign and malignant breast lesions: differentiation with echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 1995;197:33–38.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bone B, Aspelin P, Bronge L, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of MR mammography with histopathological correlation in 250 breasts. Acta Radiol. 1996;37:208–213.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Fobben ES, Rubin CZ, Kalisher L, et al. Breast MR imaging with commercially available techniques: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1995;196:143–152.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Teifke A, Hlawatsch A, Beier T, et al. Undetected malignancies of the breast: dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging at 1.0T. Radiology 2002;224:881–888.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Orel SG, Mendonca MH, Reynolds C, et al. MR imaging of ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology 1997;202:413–420.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Gilles R, Zafrani B, Guinebretiere JM, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: MR imaging-histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1995;196:415–419.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Soderstrom CE, Harms SE, Copit DS, et al. Three-dimensional RODEO breast MR imaging of lesions containing ductal carcinoma in situ. Radiology 1996;201:427–432.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Boetes C, Strijk SP, Holland R, et al. False-negative MR imaging of malignant breast tumors. Eur Radiol. 1997;7:1231–1234.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Viehweg P, Lampe D, Buchmann J, et al. In situ and minimally invasive breast cancer: morphologic and kinetic features on contrast enhanced MR imaging. MAGMA 2000;11:129–137.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Westerhof JP, Fischer U, Moritz JD, et al. MR imaging of mammographically detected clustered calcifications: is there any value? Radiology 1998;207:675–681.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Fischer U, Westerhof JP, Brinck U, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ by dynamic MR-mammography at 1.5 T [in German]. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1996;164:290–294.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Sittek H, Kessler M, Heuck AF, et al. Morphology and contrast enhancement of ductal carcinoma in situ in dynamic 1.0 T MR mammography [in German]. Rofo Fortschr Geb Rontgenstr Neuen Bildgeb Verfahr 1997;167:247–251.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Zuiani C, Francescutti GE, Londero V, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: is there a role for MRI? J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2002;21:89–95.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Menell JH, Morris EA, Dershaw DD, et al. Determination of presence and extent pure ductal carcinoma in situ by mammography and MR. ARRS 2003 (presented).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Knopp MV, Weiss E, Sinn HP, et al. Pathophysiologic basis of contrast enhancement in breast tumors. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;10:260–266.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Guidi AJ, Fischer L, Harris JR, et al. Microvessel density and distribution in ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994;86:614–619.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Buadu LD, Murakami J, Murayama S, et al. Breast lesions: correlation of contrast medium enhancement patterns on MR images with histopathologic findings and tumor angiogenesis. Radiology 1996;200:639–649.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hwang ES, Kinkel K, Esserman L, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ: value in the diagnosis of residual disease, occult invasion, and multicentricity. Ann Surg Oncol. 2003;10:381–388.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Nakahara H, Namba K, Fukami A, et al. Three-dimensional MR imaging of mammographically detected suspicious microcalcifications. Breast Cancer 2001;8:116–124.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Rosen PP, Braun DW Jr, Kinne DE. The clinical significance of pre-invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer 1980;46:919–925.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Breast Imaging Section, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY

    Jennifer H. Menell MD (Assistant Attending Radiologist)

  2. Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, 10021, USA

    Jennifer H. Menell MD (Assistant Attending Radiologist)

Authors
  1. Jennifer H. Menell MD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Menell, J.H. (2005). Ductal Carcinoma In Situ. In: Breast MRI. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-27595-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-27595-9_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-21997-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-27595-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation