Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Breast MRI pp 256–265Cite as

Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Clinical Tool

  • Chapter

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Gorczyca DP, Sinha S, Ahn CY, et al. Silicone breast implants in vivo: MR imaging. Radiology 1992;185:407–410.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gorczyca DP, DeBruhl ND, Ahn CY, et al. Silicone breast implant ruptures in an animal model: comparison of mammography, MR imaging, US and CT. Radiology 1994;190:227–232.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Berg WA, Caskey CI, Hamper UM, et al. Single-and double-lumen silicone breast implant integrity: prospective evaluation of MR and US criteria. Radiology 1995;197:45–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Berg WA, Nguyen TK, Middleton MS, et al. MR imaging of extracapsular silicone from breast implants: diagnostic pitfalls. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:465–472.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hrung JM, Langlotz CP, Orel SG, et al. Cost-effectiveness of MR imaging and core-needle biopsy in the preoperative work-up of suspicious breast lesions. Radiology 1999;213:39–49.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee CH, Smith RC, Levine JA, et al. Clinical usefulness of MR imaging of the breast in the evaluation of the problematic mammogram. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999;173:1323–1329.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stomper PC, Herman S, Klippenstein DL, et al. Suspect breast lesions: findings at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging correlated with mammographic and pathologic features. Radiology 1995;196:387–395.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brink U, Rischer U, Korabiowska M, et al. The variability of fibroadenoma in contrast-enhanced dynamic MR mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;168:1331–1334.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Orel SG, Schnall MD, LiVolsi VA, Troupin RH. Suspicious breast lesions: MR imaging with radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1994;190:485–493.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Matsubayashi R, Matsuo Y, Edakuni G, et al. Breast masses with peripheral rim enhancement on dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images: correlation of MR findings with histologic features and expression of growth factors. Radiology 2000;217:841–848.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fobben ES, Rubin C, Kalisher L, et al. Breast MR imaging with commercially available techniques: radiology-pathologic correlation. Radiology 1995;196:143–152.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, et al. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology 1993;187:493–501.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Wedegaertner U, Bick U, Woertler K, et al. Differentiation between benign and malignant findings on MR-mammography: usefulness of morphological criteria. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:1645–1650.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Westerhof JP, Fischer U, Moritz JD, Oestmann JW. MR imaging of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications: is there any value? Radiology 1998;207:675–681.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Gilles R, Guinebretiere J, Lucidarme O, et al. Nonpalpable breast tumors: diagnosis with contrast-enhanced subtraction dynamic MR imaging. Radiology 1994;191:625–631.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Liberman L, Morris EA, Lee MJY, et al. Breast lesions detected by MR imaging: features and positive predictive value. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:171–178.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Slanetz PJ, Edmister WB, Yeh ED, et al. Occult contralateral breast carcinoma incidentally detected by breast magnetic resonance imaging. Breast J. 2002;8:145–148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brown J, Smith RC, Lee CH. Incidental enhancing lesions found on MR imaging of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:1249–1254.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG, et al. Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. Radiology 1997;202:833–841.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Siegmann KC, Muller-Schimpfle M, Schick F, et al. MR imaging-detected breast lesions: histopathologic correlation of lesion characteristics and signal intensity data. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:1403–1409.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. LaTrenta LR, Menell JH, Morris EA, et al. Breast lesions detected with MR imaging: utility and histopathologic importance of identification with US. Radiology 2003;227:856–861.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Panizza P, De Gaspari A, Vanzulli A, et al. Accuracy of post-MR imaging second-look-sonography in previously undetected breast lesions [abstract]. Radiology 1997;205:489.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Dhamanaskar KP, Muradall D, Kulkarni SR, et al. MRI directed ultrasound: a cost effective method for diagnosis and intervention in breast imaging [abstract]. Radiology 2002;225:653.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hlawatsch A, Teifke A, Schmidt M, Thelen M. Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: sonography versus MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:1493–1501.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Boetes C, Mus RDM, Holland R, et al. Breast tumors: comparative accuracy of MR imaging relative to mammography and US for demonstrating extent. Radiology 1995;197:743–737.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Weinstein SP, Orel SG, Heller R, et al. MR imaging of the breast in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:399–406.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Qayyum A, Birdwell RL, Daniel BL, et al. MR imaging features of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: histopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:1227–1232.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Frei KA, Kinkel K, Bonel HM, et al. MR imaging of the breast in patients with positive margins after lumpectomy: influence of the time interval between lumpectomy and MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;175:1577–1584.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Gilles R, Guinebretiere J, Shapeero LG, et al. Assessment of breast cancer recurrence with contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging: preliminary results in 26 patients. Radiology 1993;188:473–478.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Dao TH, Rahmouni A, Campana F, et al. Tumor recurrence versus fibrosis in the irradiated breast: differentiation with dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1993;187:751–755.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Dershaw DD, McCormick B, Cox L, Osborne MP. Differentiation of benign and malignant local tumor recurrence after lumpectomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;155:35–38.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology 2001;220:13–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Gilles R, Guinebretiere JM, Toussaint C, et al. Locally advanced breast cancer: contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging of response to preoperative chemotherapy. Radiology 1994;191:633–638.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Partridge SC, Gibbs JE, Lu Y, et al. Accuracy of MR imaging for revealing residual breast cancer in patients who have undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:1193–1199.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Junkermann H, von Fournier D. Imaging procedures for assessment of the response of mamary carcinoma to preoperative chemotherapy. Der Radiologe 1997;37:726–732.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Rieber A, Brambs HJ, Gabelmann A, et al. Breast MRI for monitoring response of primary breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1711–1719.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Wasser K, Sinn HP, Fink C, et al. Accuracy of tumor size measurement in breast cancer using MRI is influenced by histological regression induced by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1213–1223.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Orel SG, Dougherty CS, Reynolds C, et al. MR imaging in patients with nipple discharge: initial experience. Radiology 2000;216:248–254.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Yoshimoto M, Kasumi F, Iwase T, et al. Magnetic resonance galactrography for a patient with nipple discharge. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1997;42:87–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ralleigh G, Walker AE, Hall-Craggs MA, et al. MR imaging of the skin and nipple of the breast: differentiation between tumour recurrence and post-treatment change. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:1651–1658.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Douek M, Hall-Craggs MA. Can the use of preoperative MR imaging reduce local recurrence rates in patients with retroareolar breast cancer who undergo breast-conservation surgery? [letter]. Radiology 1999;210:880–881.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Buadu AA, Buadu LD, Murakami J, et al. Enhancement of the nipple-areolar-complex on contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast. Breast Cancer 1998;5:285–289.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kothari AD, Beechey-Newman N, Hamed H, et al. Paget disease of the nipple, a multifocal manifestation of higher-risk disease. Cancer 2002;95:1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Morris EA, Schwartz LH, Dershaw DD, et al. MR imaging of the breast in patients with occult primary breast carcinoma. Radiology 1997;205:437–440.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Rosen PP. Unusual clinical presentations of carcinoma. In: Rosen PP, ed. Rosen’s Breast Pathology. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven; 1997:567–595.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Olson JA Jr, Morris EA, Van Zee KJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging facilitates breast conservation for occult breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2000;7:411–415.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Orel SG, Weinstein SP, Schnall MD, et al. Breast MR imaging in patients with axillary node metastases and unknown primary malignancy. Radiology 1999;212:543–549.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Warner E, Plewes DB, Shumak RS, et al. Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:3524–3531.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Stoutjesdijk MJ, Boetes C, Jager GJ, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001;93:1095–1102.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Morris EA, Liberman L, Ballon DJ, et al. MRI of occult breast carcinoma in a high-risk population. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;181:619–626.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Liberman L. Breast cancer screening with MRI—what are the data for patients at high risk? (editorial) N Engl J Med 2004;351:497–500.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Breast Imaging Section, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, NY

    D. David Dershaw MD, FACR (Director, Attending Radiologist)

  2. Department of Radiology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, 10021, USA

    D. David Dershaw MD, FACR (Director, Attending Radiologist)

Authors
  1. D. David Dershaw MD, FACR
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dershaw, D.D. (2005). Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Clinical Tool. In: Breast MRI. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-27595-9_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-27595-9_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-21997-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-27595-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation