Skip to main content

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Women with Breast Implants

  • Chapter
Book cover Breast MRI

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown SL, Silverman BG, Berg WA. Rupture of silicone-gel breast implants: causes, sequelae, and diagnosis. Lancet 1997;350:1531–1537.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ganott MA, Harris KM, Ilkhanipous ZS, Costa-Greco MA. Augmentation mammoplasty: normal and abnormal findings with mammography and US. Radiographics 1992;12:281–295.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Berg WA, Caskey CI, Hamper UM, et al. Diagnosing breast implant rupture with MR imaging, US, and mammography. Radiographics 1993;13:1323–1336.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Caskey CI, Berg WA, Hamper U, et al. Imaging spectrum of extracapsular silicone: correlation of US, MR imaging, mammographic, and histopathologic findings. Radiographics 1999;19:S39–S51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. LeVier RR, Harrison MC, Cook RR, Lane TH. What is silicone? Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;92:163–167.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Berg WA, Caskey CI, Hamper UM, et al. Single-and double-lumen silicone breast implant integrity: prospective evaluation of MR and US criteria. Radiology 1995;197:45–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brinton LA, Toniolo P, Pasternack BS. Epidemiologic follow up studies of breast augmentation patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 1995;48:557–563.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Berg WA, Anderson ND, Zerhouni EA, et al. MR imaging of the breast in patients with silicone breast implants: normal postoperative variants and diagnostic pitfalls. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:575–578.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kessler DA. The basis of the FDA’s decision on breast implants. N Engl J Med. 1992;326:1713–1715.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kolata G. FDA defers final decision about implants. The New York Times. January 9, 2004:A1.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dowden RV. Definition of terms for describing loss of gel from breast implants. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;160: 1360.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Silverman BG, Brown SL, Bright RA, et al. Reported complications of silicone gel breast implants: an epidemiologic review. Ann Intern Med. 1996;124:744–756.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Destouet JM, Monsees BS, Oser RF, et al. Screening mammography in 350 women with breast implants: prevalence and findings of implant complications. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;159:973–978.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Fenske NA. Silicone-associated connective-tissue disease: the debate rages. Arch Dermatol. 1993;129:97–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ahn CY, Ko CY, Wagar EA, et al. Clinical significance of intracapsular fluid in patients’ breast implants. Ann Plast Surg. 1995;35:455–457.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Anderson B, Hawtof D, Alani H, Kapetansky D. The diagnosis of ruptured breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;84:903–907.

    Google Scholar 

  17. de Camara DL, Sheridan JM, Kammer BA. Ruptures and aging of silicone gel breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;91:828–834.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Robinson OG, Bradley EL, Wilson DS. Analysis of explanted silicone implants: a report of 300 patients. Ann Plast Surg. 1995;34:1–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. van Rappard JHA, Sonneveld GJ, van Twisk R, Borghouts JMHM. Pressure resistance of breast implants as a function of implantation time. Ann Plast Surg. 1988;21:566–569.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Phillips JW, de Camara DL, Lockwood MD, Grebner WCC. Strength of silicone breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;97:1215–1225.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Greenwald DP, Randolph M, May JW Jr. Mechanical analysis of explanted silicone breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98:269–275.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Eklund GW, Busby RC, Miller SH, Job JS. Improved imaging of the augmented breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;151:469–473.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. American College of Radiology. ACR practice guideline for the performance of diagnostic mammography. In: Practice Guidelines and Technical Standards 2004. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology (ACR); 2004:257–261.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Dershaw DD, Chaglassian TA. Mammography after prosthesis placement for augmentation or reconstructive mammoplasty. Radiology 1989;170:69–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Harris KM, Ganott MA, Shestak KC, et al. Silicone implant rupture: detection with US. Radiology 1993;187:761–768.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rosculet KA, Ikeda DM, Forrest ME, et al. Ruptured gel-filled silicone breast implants: sonographic findings in 19 cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992;159:711–716.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. DeBruhl ND, Gorczyca D, Ahn CY, et al. Silicone breast implants: US evaluation. Radiology 1993;189:95–98.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Caskey CI, Berg WA, Anderson ND, et al. Breast implant rupture: diagnosis with US. Radiology 1994;190:819–823.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Venta LA, Salomon CG, Flisak ME, et al. Sonographic signs of breast implant rupture. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:1413–1419.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Gorczyca DP, Sinha S, Ahn CY, et al. Silicone breast implants in vivo: MR imaging. Radiology 1992;185:407–410.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gorczyca DP, Schneider E, DeBruhl ND, et al. Silicone breast implant rupture: comparison between three-point Dixon and fast spin-echo MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162:305–310.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Gorczyca DP, DeBruhl ND, Ahn CY, et al. Silicone breast implant ruptures in an animal model: comparison of mammography, MR imaging, US and CT. Radiology 1994;190:227–232.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Ahn CY, DeBruhl ND, Gorczyca DP, et al. Comparative silicone breast implant evaluation using mammography, sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging: experience with 59 implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;94:620–627.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Everson LI, Parantainen H, Detlie T, et al. Diagnosis of implant rupture: imaging findings and relative efficacies of imaging techniques. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:57–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. American College of Radiology. ACR practice guideline for the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast. In: Practice Guidelines and Technical Standards 2004. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology (ACR); 2004:269–274.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Glover GH, Schneider E. Three-point Dixon technique for true water/fat decomposition with Bo inhomogeneity correction. Magn Reson Imaging Med. 1991;18:371–393.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Monticciolo DL, Nelson RC, Dixon WT, et al. MR detection of leakage from silicone breast implants: value of a silicone-selective pulse sequence. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163:51–56.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Mund DF, Farria DM, Gorczyca DP, et al. MR imaging of the breast in patients with silicone-gel implants: spectrum of findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;161:773–778.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Soo MS, Kornguth PJ, Walsh R, et al. Complex radial folds versus subtle signs of intracapsular rupture of breast implants: MR findings with surgical correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:1421–1427.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Berg WA, Nguyen TK, Middleton MS, et al. MR imaging of extracapsular silicone from breast implants: diagnostic pitfalls. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:465–472.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Soo MS, Kornguth PJ, Walsh R, et al. Intracapsular implant rupture: MR findings of incomplete shell collapse. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;7:724–730.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Brown SL, Middleton MS, Berg WA, et al. Prevalence of rupture of silicone gel breast implants revealed on MR imaging in a population of women in Birmingham, Alabama. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;175:1057–1064.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Pfleiderer B, Campbell T, Hulka CA, et al. Silicone gel-filled breast implants in women: findings at H-1 MR spectroscopy. Radiology 1996;201:777–783.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Reynolds HE, Buckwaler KA, Jackson VP, et al. Comparison of mammography, sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of silicone-gel breast implant rupture. Ann Plast Surg. 1994;33:247–257.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Weizer G, Malone RS, Netscher DT, et al. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in diagnosing breast implant rupture. Ann Plast Surg. 1995;34:352–361.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Monsees BS, Destouet JM. Mammography in aesthetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Perspect Plast Surg. 1991;5:103–119.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Gumucio CA, Pin P, Young WL, et al. The effect of breast implants on the radiographic detection of microcalcification and soft-tissue masses. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1989;84:772–778.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Silverstein MJ, Handel N, Gamagami P, et al. Mammographic measurements before and after augmentation mammaplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;86:1126–1130.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Silverstein MJ, Handel N, Gamagami P, et al. Breast cancer diagnosis and prognosis in women following augmentation with silicone gel-filled prostheses. Eur J Cancer. 1992;28:635–640.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Handel N, Silverstein MJ, Gamagami P, et al. Factors affecting mammographic visualization of the breast after augmentation mammaplasty. JAMA. 1992;268:1913–1917.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Berkel H, Birdsell DC, Jenkins H. Breast augmentation: a risk factor for breast cancer? N Engl J Med. 1992;326:1649–1653.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Bryant H, Brasher P. Breast implants and breast cancer-reanalysis of a linkage study. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:1535–1539.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Birdsell DC, Jenkins H, Berkel H. Breast cancer diagnosis and survival in women with and without breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;92:795–800.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Deapen DM, Brody GS. Augmentation mammoplasty and breast cancer: a 5-year update of the Los Angeles study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89:660–665.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Leibman AJ, Kruse B. Breast cancer: mammographic and sonographic findings after augmentation mammoplasty. Radiology 1990;174:195–198.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Grace GT, Roberts C, Cohen IK. The role of mammography in detecting breast cancer in augmented breasts. Ann Plast Surg. 1990;25:119–123.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Carlson GW, Curley SA, Martin JE, et al. The detection of breast cancer after augmentation mammoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;91:837–840.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Clark CPI, Peters GN, O’Brien KM. Cancer in the augmented breast: diagnosis and prognosis. Cancer 1993;72:2170–2174.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Fajardo LL, Harvey JA, McAleese KA, et al. Breast cancer diagnosis in women with subglandular silicone gel-filled augmentation implants. Radiology 1995;194:859–862.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Cahan AC, Ashikari R, Pressman P, et al. Breast cancer after breast augmentation with silicone implants. Ann Surg Oncol. 1995;2:121–125.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Huch RA, Kunzi W, Debatin JF, et al. MR imaging of the augmented breast. Eur Radiol. 1998;8:371–376.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Liberman, L., Berg, W.A. (2005). Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Women with Breast Implants. In: Breast MRI. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-27595-9_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-27595-9_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-21997-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-27595-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics