Skip to main content

Logistic Regression

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Statistics for Biology and Health ((SBH))

Abstract

Patients testing positive for a sexually transmitted disease at a clinic are compared to patients with negative tests to investigate the effectiveness of a new barrier contraceptive. One-month mortality following coronary artery bypass graft surgery is compared in groups of patients receiving different dosages of beta blockers. Many clinical and epidemiological studies generate outcomes which take on one of two possible values, reflecting presence/absence of a condition or characteristic at a particular time, or indicating whether a response occurred within a defined period of observation. In addition to evaluating a predictor of primary interest, it is important to investigate the importance of additional variables that may influence the observed association and therefore alter our inferences about the nature of the relationship. In evaluating the effect of contraceptive use in the first example, it would be clearly important to control for age in addition to behaviors potentially linked to infection risk. In the second example, a number of demographic and clinical variables may be related to both the mortality outcome and treatment regime. Both of these examples are characterized by binary outcomes and multiple predictors, some of which are continuous.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

6.8 Further Notes and References

  • Breslow, N. E. and Day, N. E. (1984). Statistical Methods in Cancer Research Volume I: The Analysis of Case-Control Studies. Oxford University Press, Lyon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, R. J., Ruppert, D. and Stefanski, L. A. (1995). Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Collett, D. (2003). Modelling Binary Data. Chapman & Hall/CRC, London, New York.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Hosmer, D. W. and Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied Logistic Regression. John Wiley & Sons, New York, Chichester.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jewell, N. P. (2004). Statistics for Epidemiology. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleinbaum, D. G. (2002). Logistic Regression: a Self-Learning Text. Springer-Verlag Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magder, L. S. and Hughes, J. P. (1997). Logistic regression when the outcome is measured with uncertainty. American Journal of Epidemiology, 146, 195–203.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

(2005). Logistic Regression. In: Regression Methods in Biostatistics. Statistics for Biology and Health. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-27255-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics