Abstract
Continuous data from crossover trials are often analysed using ordinary least squares with the assumption of independent errors. Because each experimental unit receives a sequence of treatment and repeated measurements are collected, it is more realistic to assume that the errors within an experimental unit are correlated. In this paper, we extend to crossover designs the conditions on the covariance structure of the errors, found by Huynh and Feldt (1970) for randomized block and split-plot designs, that will not invalidate the F-ratio tests for treatment and carryover effects. We also show that results on optimal crossover designs remain valid under this more general structure of the covariance matrix.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Anderson, T.W. (1984). An Introduction to Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Second Edition, Wiley, New York.
Bellavance, F., Tardif, S., and Stephens, M.A. (1996). Tests for the analysis of variance of crossover designs with correlated errors. Biometrics, 52:607–612.
Bose, M. and Mukherjee, B. (2003). Optimal crossover designs under a general model. Statistics & Probability Letters, 62:413–418.
Chen, X., Zhao, P.-L., and Zhang, J. (2002). A note on ANOVA assumptions and robust analysis for a cross-over study. Statistics in Medicine, 21:1377–1386.
Cheng, C.S. and Wu, C.F. (1980). Balanced repeated measurements designs. The Annals of Statistics, 8:1272–1283. Corrigendum, 11:349, 1983.
Goad, C.L. and Johnson, D.E. (2000). Crossover experiments: A comparison of ANOVA tests and alternative analyses. Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 5:69–87.
Hedayat, A. and Afsarinejad, K. (1978). Repeated measures designs II. The Annals of Statistics, 6:619–628.
Huynh, H. and Feldt, L.S. (1970). Conditions under which mean square ratios in repeated measurement designs have exact F-distributions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65:1582–1589.
Jones, B. and Kenward, M.G. (1989). Design and Analysis of Cross-Over Trials. Chapman & Hall, New York.
Jones, B. and Wang, J. (2000). The analysis of repeated measurements in sensory and consumer studies. Food Quality and Preference, 11:35–41.
Kiefer, J. (1975). Construction and optimality of generalised Youden designs. In: Srivastava, J.N. (ed.), A Survey of Statistical Design and Linear Models, pp. 333–353, North Holland, Amsterdam.
Kotlarski, I. (1964). On bivariate random variables where the quotient of their coordinates follows some known distribution. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 35:1673–1684.
Kunert, J. (1984). Optimality of balanced uniform repeated measurements designs. The Annals of Statistics, 12:1006–1017.
Kunert, J. (1985). Optimal repeated measurements designs for correlated observations and analysis by least squares. Biometrika, 72:375–389.
Kunert, J. (1987). On variance estimation in cross-over designs. Biometrics, 43:833–845.
Kushner, H.B. (1997). Optimal repeated measurements designs: the linear optimality equations. The Annals of Statistics, 25:2328–2344.
Kushner, H.B. (1998). Optimal and efficient repeated-measurements designs for uncorrelated observations. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 93:1176–1187.
Matthews, J.N.S. (1987). Optimal crossover designs for the comparison of two treatments in the presence of carryover effects and autocorrelated errors. Biometrika, 74:311–320.
Matthews, J.N.S. (1989). Estimating dispersion parameters in the analysis of data from crossover trials. Biometrika, 76:239–244.
Matthews, J.N.S. (1990). The analysis of data from crossover designs: The efficiency of Ordinary Least Squares. Biometrics, 46:689–696.
Monga and Tardif, S. (1992). Validity of the F-ratio test for replicated latin square designs under relaxed conditions. Biometrical Journal, 34:701–709.
Searle, S.R. (1987). Linear Models for Unbalanced Data. Wiley, New York.
Serfling, R.J. (1980). Approximation Theorems of Mathematical Statistics. Wiley, New York.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bellavance, F., Tardif, S. (2005). Conditions for the Validity of F-Ratio Tests for Treatment and Carryover Effects in Crossover Designs. In: Duchesne, P., RÉMillard, B. (eds) Statistical Modeling and Analysis for Complex Data Problems. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24555-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-24555-3_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-387-24554-6
Online ISBN: 978-0-387-24555-3
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)