Skip to main content

Combinatorial Interlicense Competition

Spectrum Deregulation Without Confiscation or Giveaways

  • Chapter
  • 468 Accesses

Part of the book series: Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series ((TREP,volume 47))

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ballard, Charles L., John B. Shoven and John Whalley. 1985. “General Equilibrium Computations of the Marginal Welfare Costs of Taxes in the United States.” American Economic Review 75: 128–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase, Ronald H. 1959. “The Federal Communications Commission.” Journal of Law and Economics 2: 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fullerton, Don. 1988. “If Labor is Inelastic, Are Taxes Still Distorting?” Working Paper. University of Virginia. Charlottesville, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujishima, Y., K. Leyton-Brown, Y. Shoham. 1999. “Taming the Computational Complexity of Combinatorial Auctions: Optimal and Approximate Approaches.” Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI). Stockholm, Sweden: 548–553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, B.F., M.H. Rothkopf, L.C. Hyde, R.P. O’Neill. 2000. Evaluation of a Truthful Revelation Auction for Energy Markets with Nonconcave Benefits. Journal of Regulatory Economics 18(1): 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobb, Bennett Z. 2001. Wireless Spectrum Finder: Telecommunication, Government and Scientific Radio Frequency Allocations in the U.S. 30 MHz to 3000 GHz. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwerel, Evan R. and John R. Williams. 1992. “Changing Channels: Voluntary Reallocation of UHF Television Spectrum.” U.S. Federal Communications Commission. Office of Plans and Policy. OPP Working Paper No. 27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwerel, Evan R. and John R. Williams. 2002. “A Proposal for Rapid Transition to Market Allocation of Spectrum.” U.S. Federal Communications Commission. Office of Plans and Policy. OPP Working Paper No. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linowes, David F., Chairman. 1984. Report to Congress: Commission on Fair Market Value Policy for Federal Coal Leasing. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Sunju, and Michael H. Rothkopf. 2004. “Auctions with Endogenously Determined Biddable Combinations.” European Journal of Operations Research forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossten, Gregory L. and Thomas W. Hazlett. 2001. “Comments of 37 Concerned Economists.” Comment on WT Docket No. 00-230. Federal Communications Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothkopf, Michael H. 1977. “Bidding in Simultaneous Auctions with a Constraint on Exposure.” Operations Research 25: 620–629.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rothkopf, Michael H. and Coleman Bazelon. 2003. “Spectrum Regulation without Confiscation or Giveaways.” Comment in the Matter of Issues Related to the Commission’s Spectrum Policies, ET Docket No. 02-135. Federal Communications Commission. January 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothkopf, Michael H., Edward P. Kahn, Thomas J. Teisberg, Joseph Eto and Jean-Michel Nataf. 1990. “Designing Purpa Power Purchase Auctions: Theory and Practice.” In Competition in Electricity: New Markets and New Structures, edited by James Plummer and Susan Troppmann. Arlington, VA: Public Utilities Reports, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothkopf, Michael H., Aleksandar Pekec and Ronald M. Harstad. 1998. “Computationally Manageable Combinational Auctions.” Management Science 44: 1131–1147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakurai, Y., M. Yokoo, S. Matsubara 1999. “An efficient approximate algorithm for winner determination in combinatorial auctions.” Proceedings of the Second ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC-00). 30–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snider, J.H., Michael H. Rothkopf, Bennett Kopp, Nigel Holmes, and Troy Kravitz. 2003. “The Citizen’s Guide to the Airwaves.” Washington, DC: The New America Foundation, July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuart, Charles. 1984. “Welfare Costs per Additional Tax Dollar in the United States.” American Economic Review 74: 352–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Congress. Congressional Budget Office. 1987. Where Do We Go From Here? The FCC Auctions and the Future of Radio Spectrum Management. 105 th Congress. Washington, DC: The Congress of The United States.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of the Interior. Office of Policy Analysis. 1981. “Improvements to the Federal Coal Leasing Program Linked to the Use of Intertract Bidding.” Report. April.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Federal Communications Commission. Spectrum Policy Task Force. 2002. “Spectrum Policy Task Force Report.” ET Docket No. 02-135. November.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rothkopf, M.H., Bazelon, C. (2005). Combinatorial Interlicense Competition. In: Crew, M.A., Crew, M.A., Spiegel, M. (eds) Obtaining the Best from Regulation and Competition. Topics in Regulatory Economics and Policy Series, vol 47. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-23196-X_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics