Skip to main content

Medicolegal Aspects of Asbestos-Related Diseases: A Plaintiff’s Attorney’s Perspective

  • Chapter

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   199.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. First-century historians and authors Strabo and Pliny the Elder both observed adverse biological effects of asbestos in the lungs of slaves who wove asbestos into cloth. See Lee, DHK, Selikoff IJ, Historical background to the asbestos problem, Environ Res 18:300–314, 1979.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Murray HM: Departmental Committee on Compensation for Industrial Diseases—Minutes of Evidence. Appendices and Index. London: Wyman and Sons, 1907, pp. 127–28.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cooke WE: Fibrosis of the lungs due to the inhalation of asbestos dust. Br Med J 2:147, 1924.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Merewether ERA, Price CW: Reports on effects of asbestos dust on lungs and dust suppression in the asbestos industry. H.M. Stationery Office, 1930.

    Google Scholar 

  5. W.C. Hueper, quoted in, Castleman B: Asbestos: Medical and Legal Aspects, 4th ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1996, p. xvii.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 36 Fed. Reg. 3031 (March 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  7. 38 Fed. Reg. 8820 (April 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  8. 40 Fed. Reg. 48299 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  9. 36 Fed. Reg. 10466 (May 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  10. 51 Fed. Reg. 22615 (June 20, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ibid., pp. 22628.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp., 527 U.S. 815, 821, 119 S.Ct. 2295 (1999) (stating that asbestos litigation “defies customary judicial administration” and “calls for national legislation.” It is important to note, however, that all proposed national legislative solutions to date have been sponsored by manufacturing defendants and have been woefully inadequate in their terms in compensation to diseased individuals.)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corp., 493 F.2d 1075 (5th Cir. 1973), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 869 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jackson v. Johns-Manville Sales Corp., 750 F.2d 1314, 1335-36 (5th Cir. 1985) (en banc).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Henderson, James A. Jr. and Aaron D. Twerski, Stargazing: The Future of American Products Liability Law, 66 N.Y.U.L. Rev. 1332, 1336 (1991).

    Google Scholar 

  16. 198 W. Va. 1, 4–5, 479 S.E.2d 300, 303–04 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  17. State of West Virginia v. MacQueen, _ W. Va. _, _ S.E.2d _, W.L. 770899 (July 6, 2001) citing H.R. Comm. on Judiciary, The Fairness in Asbestos Compensation Act: Hearings on H.R. 1283, 106th Cong. (July 1, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Georgine v. Amchem Products, Inc., 157 F.R.D. 246 (E.D.Pa. 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Amchem Products v. Windsor, 521 U.S. 591 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Plevin and Kalish, What’s Behind the Recent Wave of Asbestos Bankruptcies?, Mealey’s Litigation Report: Asbestos, April 20, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  21. -, Ibid. (noting that the stay is subject to a number of exceptions specified in the statute itself, such as regulatory actions by the government. See 11 U.S.C. § 362(b). The bankruptcy court can also terminate the stay, or modify its coverage, upon motion of a party in interest in the bankruptcy case. See 11 U.S.C. § 362(d).)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Insurance Day (September 13, 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Paul Brodeur, The Asbestos Industry on Trial, New Yorker, June 17, 1985 at 45, 75.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Letter from F. H. Zimmerman, Director of Safety, National Gypsum Co., to C. L. Sheckler, Manager, Occupational Environmental Control, Johns-Manville Corp. April 17, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Motley, Ronald and Anne Kearse, Decades of Deception: Secrets of Lead, Asbestos, and Tobacco, Trial Magazine (October 1999), citing Asbestos Textile Institute, Minutes of the Air Hygiene and Manufacturing Committee March 7, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  26. -, Ibid. (which references further example that, in 1950, the Quebec Asbestos Mining Association, whose members included Canadian asbestos mining companies, contracted with Saranac to determine whether asbestos caused cancer. A 1952 report, which was never published, showed increased cancer in mice and suggested further study. In 1957, the Canadian association contracted with the Industrial Hygiene Foundation of American to study asbestos and cancer. The resulting report concluded that those with asbestosis had an increased occurrence of lung cancer. Nevertheless, attorneys and doctors hired by the Canadian association recommended those conclusions be omitted from the final report. The 1958 published report concluded that asbestos exposure did not lead to an increased statistical occurrence of lung cancer).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Letter from F. H. Zimmerman, Director of Safety, National Gypsum Co., to C. L. Sheckler, Manager, Occupational Environmental Control, Johns-Manville Corp., April 17, 1968.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mathew M. Swentonic, Presentation by the Asbestos Information Association/North America to the Asbestos Textile Institute (June 7, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  29. D. Ozonoff, Report concerning Medical Literature Review (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  30. W.C.L. Hemeon, Report of Preliminary Dust Investigation for Asbestos Textile Institute (Industrial Hygiene Foundation, 1947 unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Deposition of K. Smith in Louisville Trust Co. v. Johns-Manville Corp., No. 174–922 (Jefferson Cir. Ct., 7th Div. Ky., April 21, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Castleman B: Asbestos: Medical and Legal Aspects, 2nd ed. New York: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich, 1986, pp. 164–79.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Memorandum from W.B. Hofferth to J.E. Zeller, January 17, 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ad Hoc Committee of the Scientific Assembly on Environmental and Occupational Health: The diagnosis of nonmalignant diseases related to asbestos, Am Rev Respir Dis 134:363, 367, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Guidelines for the use of the ILO international classification of radiographs of pneumoconiosis In: Occupational Safety & Health Series No. 22 (rev.) Geneva: International Labour Office, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Compare Jones Pleural Plaques, In: The Biological Effects of Asbestos (Bogovski, ed.), Lyon: IARC Scientific Publication No. 8, 1972, pp. 243–48, with Schwartz: Determinants of restrictive lung function in asbestos-induced pleural fibrosis, J App Physiol 1932–37, 1990; Bourbeau: The relationship between respiratory impairment and asbestos-related pleural abnormality in an active work force, 142: Amer Rev Respir Dis, 837–42, 1990. Recent studies on the significance of pleural disease indicate that pleural thickening and plaques are not as benign as previously thought. They are associated with an impairment of lung function and they may predict future cancers. See Selikoff, IJ: Predictive significance of parenchymal and/or pleural fibrosis for subsequent death of asbestos-associated diseases. Exhibit 124A. Entered into OSHA docket at hearings. OSHA’s Proposed Standard for Occupational Exposure to Asbestos, Tremolite, Anthophyllite, and Actinolite, January 1991. Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Churg A: Pathology of Occupational Lung Disease, New York: Igaku-Shoin, 1988, pp. 251–253

    Google Scholar 

  38. Andrion A: Pleural plaques at autopsy, smoking habits, and asbestos exposure, Eur J Respir Dis 65:125–30, 1984.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Surgeon General, The Health Consequences of Smoking: Cancer and Chronic Lung Disease in the Workplace, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1985, pp. 241–254.

    Google Scholar 

  40. -, Ibid, pp. 241.

    Google Scholar 

  41. See cross-examination of Dr. Edwin Holstein in Kulzer v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas, No. 87-386T, p. 351 (W.D.N.Y., Rochester Div., April 24, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  42. 51 Fed. Reg. 22621 (June 20, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  43. Ibid. pp. 22616–17.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Pneumoconiosis Committee of the College of American Pathologists and the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health: The pathology of asbestos-associated diseases of the lungs and pleural cavities: diagnostic criteria and proposed grading schema, Arch Pathol Lab Med 106: 554, 559, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Churg:supra note 42, p. 260.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Ibid., pp. 262–263.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ibid., pp. 262.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ibid., pp. 262.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ibid., pp. 285.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Doll R, Peto J: Asbestos: Effects on Health of Exposure to Asbestos. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1985, p. 32. The idea that ⋯ asbestos-induced cancers occur only secondary to the fibrosis of asbestosis has sometimes been expressed. The idea originated in the days before the discovery of DNA, when cancers were not thought to result from genetic variation in somatic cells, but from the repair of tissue damage that was macroscopically visible. In light of modern knowledge of carcinogenesis, such an idea does not seem plausible. No threshold for the carcinogenic effect of asbestos has been demonstrated in humans or in laboratory animals and, in the absence of positive evidence for a threshold, we have followed standard scientific practice and assume that none exists. One possible reason for thinking that asbestos-induced cancers might be secondary to asbestosis is the high incidence of cancer in the similar condition of cryptogenic fibrosing alveolitis. As, however, the aetiology of this disease is unknown, the argument by analogy does not carry much weight and we have ignored it.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Warnock ML, Isenberg W: Asbestos and the pathology of lung cancer, Chest 89:20–26, 1986.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Selikoff I, Hammond E, Seidman H: Cancer Risk of Insulation Workers in the United States, IARC Scientific Publication No. 8, Lyon, 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Hendry NW: The geology, occurrences, and major uses of asbestos, In: Biological Effects of Asbestos, Ann NY Acad Sci 132:12–19, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Peto J: Asbestos: Effects on Health of Exposure to Asbestos. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1985 Doll and Peto: supra note 57, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Report by Dr. Ronald Dodson, Dept. of Cell Biology and Environmental Sciences, University of Texas Health Center at Tyler, May 27, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Report by Dr. Fred Pooley, Dept. of Mining and Minerals Engineering, University College, Cardiff, Wales, June 23, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Report by Dr. Victor Roggli, Dept. of Pathology, Duke University Medical Center, December 4, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Pelnar, PV: Further evidence of nonasbestos-related mesothelioma Scand J Work Environ Health 14:141–44, 1988. The author is affiliated with the Asbestos Institute.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Churg: supra note 42, p. 289.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Berry G, Newhouse M: Mortality of workers manufacturing friction materials using asbestos, Brit J Indus Med, 40:1–7, 1983; McDonald JC, Fry, JS: Mesothelioma and fiber type in three American asbestos factories, Scand J Work Environ Health 8:53–58, 1982.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. As stated by Doll and Peto: “It is not practicable to remove tremolite from chrysotile for commercial purposes and any distinction between the effects of chrysotile and tremolite may, therefore, be considered academic, unless supplies of chrysotile can be obtained in which little or no tremolite is present.”Peto J: Asbestos: Effects on Health of Exposure to Asbestos. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, 1985 Supra note 57, p. 17.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wagner JC: Complexities in the evaluation of epidemiologic data of fiberexposed populations, In: Dusts and Disease, (Lemen R, Dement J, eds., Park Forest South, IL: Pathotox, 1979, pp. 37–39.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Churg: supra note 42, p. 267.

    Google Scholar 

  65. McDonald, JC: Asbestos and lung cancer: Has the case been proven? Chest 78:374–376, 1980.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Surgeon General, The Health Consequences of Smoking: Cancer and Chronic Disease in the Workplace. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, 1985, pp. 217–18.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Selikoff IJ: Asbestos-associated disease. In: Public Health and Preventive Medicine, 12th ed. (Maxcy-Rosenau, ed.), East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1986, pp. 523–534.

    Google Scholar 

  68. 51 Fed. Reg. 22615 (June 20, 1986).

    Google Scholar 

  69. 54 Fed. Reg. 19461 (July 17, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  70. Selikoff: supra 78.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Ibid.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2004 Springer-Verlag New York, Inc.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Motley, R.L., Patrick, C.W., Kearse, A.M. (2004). Medicolegal Aspects of Asbestos-Related Diseases: A Plaintiff’s Attorney’s Perspective. In: Roggli, V.L., Sporn, T.A., Oury, T.D. (eds) Pathology of Asbestos-Associated Diseases. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21819-X_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-21819-X_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-0-387-20090-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-387-21819-9

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics