Skip to main content

Reduction in Disinfection Byproduct Precursors and Pathogens During Riverbank Filtration at Three Midwestern United States Drinking-Water Utilities

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Water Science and Technology Library ((WSTL,volume 43))

Conclusions

The three sites investigated during this project demonstrated the ability of RBF to effectively reduce a variety of microbial contaminants, TOC, DOC, disinfection byproduct precursor material, and total theoretical THM cancer risk. TOC and DOC reductions ranged from 35 to 67 percent for the closest wells at the three sites. Total THM FP and HAA FP reductions ranged from 57 to 73 percent and 50 to 78 percent, respectively. The higher reduction in disinfection byproduct precursor concentrations compared to TOC or DOC suggests a preferential removal of precursor material. In addition, a shift was observed upon RBF from the chlorinated to the more brominated disinfection byproduct species.

Further, it was demonstrated that RBF can provide reductions in TOC, DOC, disinfection byproduct precursor material, and theoretical cancer risk that match or exceed those provided by conventional treatment processes, even though the distribution of disinfection byproducts favors the brominated species in riverbank-filtered water. Total THM FP and HAA FP reductions upon simulated treatment ranged from 44 to 66 percent and 45 to 69 percent, respectively. Total THM FP and HAA FP reductions upon RBF ranged from 53 to 82 percent and 47 to 80 percent, respectively. Reductions in the theoretical cancer risk due to the THM FP concentrations ranged from 11 to 47 percent and 28 to 45 percent for the treated and riverbank-filtered waters, respectively. For two of the sites, ozonation of the riverbank-filtered water provided the largest reduction in theoretical cancer risk. As utilities respond to increasingly stringent regulations regarding disinfection byproducts and microbial contaminants, the water-quality improvements commensurate with RBF can help meet those regulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation (1998). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th Edition. American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, B.D., G.W. Harrington, and P.C. Singer (1996). “Reducing cancer risks by improving organic carbon removal.” Journal American Water Works Association, 88(6): 40–52.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bouwer, E., J. Weiss, W. Ball, C. O’Melia, and H. Arora (1999). “Water quality improvements during riverbank filtration at three midwest utilities.” Abstracts, International Riverbank Filtration Conference, National Water Research Institute, Fountain Valley, California, 49–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Croué, J.P., J.F. Debroux, G.L. Amy, G.R. Aiken, and J.A. Leenheer (1999). “Natural organic matter: Structural characteristics and reactive properties.” Formation and control of disinfection by-products in drinking water, P.C. Singer, ed., American Water Works Association, Denver, Colorado, 65–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doussan, C., G. Poitevin, E. Ledoux, and M. Detay (1997). “River bank filtration: Modeling of the changes in water chemistry with emphasis on nitrogen species.” Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 25: 129–156.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kivimaki, A.L., K. Lahti, T. Hatva, S.M. Tuominen, and I.T. Miettinen (1998). “Removal of organic matter during bank filtration.” Artificial Recharge of Groundwater, J.H. Peters, ed., A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 107–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kühn, W, and U. Müller (2000). “Riverbank filtration: An overview.” Journal of American Water Works Association, 92(12): 60–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kussmaul, H. (1979). “Purifying action of the ground in the treatment of drinking water.” Oxidation techniques in drinking water treatment, W. Kuhn and H. Sontheimer, eds., U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., 597–607.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miltner, R.J., H.B. Shukairy, and R.S. Summers (1992). “Disinfection by-product formation and control by ozonation and biotreatment.” Journal of American Water Works Association, 84(11): 53–62.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parkhurst, D.F., and D.A. Stern (1998). “Determining average concentrations of Cryptosporidium and other pathogens in water.” Environmental Science and Technology, 32(21): 3424–3429.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piet, G.J., and B.C.J. Zoeteman (1985). “Bank and dune infiltration of surface water in The Netherlands.” Artificial recharge of groundwater, T. Asano, ed., Butterworth Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts, 529–540.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock, D.W. (1994). “User’s Guide for MODPATH/MODPATH-PLOT, Version 3: A particle tracking post-processing package for MODFLOW, the U.S. Geological Survey finite-difference ground-water flow model.” U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 94-464, U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ray, C. (1999). “Pesticide and nitrate issues at selected bank filtration sites in Illinois.” Abstracts, International Riverbank Filtration Conference, National Water Research Institute, Fountain Valley, California, 35–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, P.C. (1999). “Humic substances as precursors for potentially harmful disinfection by-products.” Water Science and Technology, 40(9): 25–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sontheimer, H. (1980). “Experience with riverbank filtration along the Rhine River.” Journal of American Water Works Association, 72(7): 386–390.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stuyfzand, P.J. (1998). “Fate of pollutants during artificial recharge and bank filtration in The Netherlands.” Artificial recharge of groundwater, J.H. Peters, ed., A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 119–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Summers, R.S., S.M. Hooper, H.M. Shukairy, G. Solarik, and D. Owen (1996). “Assessing DBP yield: Uniform formation conditions.” Journal of American Water Works Association, 88(6): 80–93.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Verstraeten, I.M., J.G. Miriovsky, and E.C. Lee (1999). “Herbicide removal through bank filtration using horizontal collector wells at Ashland, Nebraska.” Abstracts, International Riverbank Filtration Conference, National Water Research Institute, Fountain Valley, California, 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., R. Song, T. Sweazy, and S. Hubbs (1999). “Determination of water travel time of riverbank filtration process.” Abstracts, International Riverbank Filtration Conference, National Water Research Institute, Fountain Valley, CA, 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M.C., J.D. Thompson, G.W. Harrington, and P.C. Singer (1997). “Evaluating criteria for enhanced coagulation compliance.” Journal American Water Works Association, 89(5): 64–77.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wilderer, P.A., U. Förstner, and O.R. Kuntschik (1985). “The role of riverbank filtration along the Rhine River for municipal and industrial water supply.” Artificial recharge of groundwater, T. Asano, ed., Butterworth Publishers, Boston, Massachusetts, 509–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1992). “Methods for the determination of organic compounds in drinking water, Supplement II.” EPA/600/R-92/129, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1993). “Methods for the determination of inorganic substances in environmental samples.” EPA/600/R-93/100, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1994). “Methods for the determination of metals in environmental samples, Supplement I.” EPA/600/R-94/111, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (1996). “ICR microbial laboratory manual.” EPA/600/R-95/178, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) database (2000). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency website, 〈http://www.epa.gov/iriswebp/iris/index.html〉.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Kluwer Academic Publishers

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Weiss, W.J., Bouwer, E.J., Ball, W.P., O’Melia, C.R., Arora, H., Speth, T.F. (2002). Reduction in Disinfection Byproduct Precursors and Pathogens During Riverbank Filtration at Three Midwestern United States Drinking-Water Utilities. In: Ray, C., Melin, G., Linsky, R.B. (eds) Riverbank Filtration. Water Science and Technology Library, vol 43. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48154-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-48154-5_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4020-1133-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-0-306-48154-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics