Conclusions and Opinions
When circumstances allow the examiner to conclude that the individual probably understood very little about the rights at the time that they were waived, this still does not justify expert testimony concerning the validity of waiver (i.e., testimony that the waiver was or was not made “knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily”). Nothing about the empirical nature of the forensic assessment instruments justifies testimony by expert witnesses on questions that require moral and social judgments in the application of the legal standard.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer Science + Business Media, Inc.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
(2005). Waiver of Rights to Silence and Legal Counsel. In: Evaluating Competencies. Perspectives in Law & Psychology, vol 16. Springer, Boston, MA. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47922-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47922-2_5
Publisher Name: Springer, Boston, MA
Print ISBN: 978-0-306-47343-2
Online ISBN: 978-0-306-47922-9
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive