Abstract
This study delved into the relationship between temporal perspectives (i.e., past-positive, past-negative, present hedonistic, present-fatalistic, and future time perspective) and motivational types (i.e., intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, and amotivation) among 200 Filipino undergraduates of a private catholic university. Correlation results support Western studies and further shows future time perspective (FTP) and past-positive time perspective as significant predictors of intrinsic motivation toward achievement (R 2 = .11, F(2,197) = 12.28, p < .000), extrinsic motivation introjected (R 2 = .16, F(2,197) = 18.42, p < .000), and extrinsic motivation external (R 2 = .10, F(2,197) = 10.78, p < .000). Findings also show FTP, past-positive time perspective, and present-fatalistic perspectives as predictors of extrinsic motivation identified: R 2 = .16, F(3,196) = 12.71, p < .000. Lastly, significant values of FTP and present-fatalistic time perspective also emerged as predictors of amotivation: R 2 = .10, F(2,197) = 10.81, p < .000.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bilde, J., Vansteenkiste, M., & Lens, W. (2011). Understanding the association between future perspective and self-regulated learning through the lens of self-determination theory. Learning and Instruction, 55, 332–344.
Catsambis, S. (2002). Higher education and social equality. In D. Levinson, P. Cookson, & A. Sadovnik (Eds.), Education and sociology an encyclopaedia (pp. 335–342). New York: Routledge Falmer.
D’Alessio, M., Guarino, A., De Pascalis, V., & Zimbardo, P. G. (2003). Testing Zimbardo’s stanford time perspective inventory (STPI) – Short form: An Italian study. Time and Society, 12, 333–347.
De Volder, M., & Lens, W. (1982). Academic achievement and future time perspective as a cognitive-motivation concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(3), 566–571.
Deci, E., & Ryan, R. (2009). Self-determination theory: A consideration of human motivational universals. In P. Corr & G. Matthews (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of personality psychology (pp. 441–456). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Dela Rosa, E., & Bernardo, A. (2013). Testing multiple goals theory in an Asian context: Filipino university students’ motivation and academic achievement. International Journal of School and Educational Psychology, 1(1), 47–57. doi:10.1080/21683603.2013.782594.
Fairchild, A., Horst, J., Finney, S., & Barron, K. (2005). Evaluating existing and new validity evidence for the academic motivation scale. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(3), 331–358.
Guay, F., Ratelle, C., & Chanal, J. (2008). Optimal learning in optimal contexts: The role of self-determination in education. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 233–240. doi:10.1037/a0012758.
Horstmanshof, L., & Zimitat, C. (2007). Future time orientation predicts academic engagement among first-year university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 703–718.
Jang, H., Reeve, J., Ryan, R., & Kim, A. (2009). Can self-determination theory explain what underlies the productive, satisfying learning experiences of collectivistically oriented Korean students? Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 644–661. doi:10.1037/a0014241.
Kauffman, D., & Husman, J. (2004). Effect of time perspective on student motivation: Introduction to a special issue. Educational Psychology Review, 16(1), 1–7.
King, R., & Gaerlan, J. (2013). To study or not to study? Investigating the link between time perspectives and motivation interference. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology, (2)63–72. doi:10.1017/prp.2013.8.
King, R., & Ganotice, F. (2013). Student motivation as hierarchical and multidimensional: Cross-cultural validation of personal investment theory in the Philippines. Universitas Psychologica, 12(3), 685–698. doi: 10.1144/Javeriana.UPSY12-3.smhm
King, R., & McInerney, D. (2012). Including social goals in achievement motivation research: Examples from the Philippines. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture 5(3). Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1104
Lee, J., McInerney, D., Liem, G., & Ortiga, Y. (2010). The relationship between future goals and achievement goal orientations: An intrinsic-extrinsic motivation perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 264–279.
Lens, W., Paixao, M., & Herrera, D. (2009). Instrumental motivation is extrinsic motivation: So what? Psychogica, 50, 21–40.
Lepper, M., Corpus, J., & Iyengar, S. (2005). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivational orientations in the classroom: Age differences and academic correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 184–196. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.97.2.184.
Lepper, M., Henderlong, J., Carol, S., & Judith, M. (2000). Turning “play” into work and “work” into “play”: 25 years of research on intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation. In C. Sansone & J. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation (pp. 257–307). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Otis, N., Grouzet, F., & Pelletier, L. (2005). Latent motivational change in an academic setting: A 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 170–183.
Peetsma, T., & van der Veen, I. (2011). Relations between the development of future time perspective in three life domains, investment in learning, and academic achievement. Learning and Instruction, 21, 481–494.
Pintrich, P. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching context. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 667–686.
Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020.
Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68.
Stevens, P., & Weale, M. (2004). Education and Economic Growth. In G. Johnes & J. Johnes (Eds.), International handbook on the economics of education (pp. 164–188). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Vallerand, R., Pelletier, L., Blais, M., Briere, N., Senécal, C., & Vallières, E. (1992). The academic motivation scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic and amotivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52, 1003–1017.
Worrell, F., & Mello, Z. (2007). The reliability and validity of Zimbardo time perspective inventory scores in academically talented adolescents. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 67, 487–504. doi:10.1177/0013164406296985.
Zimbardo, P., & Boyd, J. (1999). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1271–1288.
Zimbardo, P., & Boyd, J. (2009). The time paradox. New York: Free Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ilustrisimo, R.D. (2016). Exploring Links Between Time Perspective and Academic Motivation among Filipino Undergraduates. In: King, R., Bernardo, A. (eds) The Psychology of Asian Learners. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-576-1_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-576-1_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-287-575-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-287-576-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)