Skip to main content

Abstract

This paper reports on an investigation into the causes of error in the design process based on a series of case studies in three companies. An initial study attempted to identify the points of occurrence of error in the case studies based on formal process models of the design activities. However, it was found to be difficult, if not impossible, to make a clear identification of a point of introduction of error in any of the case studies. In general, there was no single error source, but instead there was an accumulation of a number of contributory factors that when combined led to the error situation. Furthermore, it was generally not process issues that led to error but human factors. The paper identifies four categories of error inducing circumstance: unrecognised change of circumstances; lack of design effort; lack of integration of information and want of knowledge. Overall, it is asserted that the underlying issue is one of uncertainty handling and risk management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blockley, D.I., The Nature of Structural Design and Safety, Chichester: Ellis Horwood, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  2. Petroski, H., To Engineer is Human, New York: St. Martins Press, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shibata, H., Problem solving: definition, terminology and patterns, http://www.mediafrontier.com/Article/PS/PS.htm, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  4. Stewart, M.G., Simulation of human error in reinforced concrete design, Research in Engineering Design 4(1), 1992, pp.51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, C.B. and Yin, X., Errors in structural engineering, ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 114, 1988, pp.2575–2593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Petroski, H., Paconius and the pedestal for Apollo: a case study of error in conceptual design, Research in Engineering Design, 3, 1991, pp.123–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Piésold, D. D. A., C/vz7 Engineering Practice: Engineering Success by Analysis of Failure, London: McGraw-Hill, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kaminetzky, D., Design and Construction Failures: Lessons From Forensic Investigations, New York: McGraw Hill, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  9. Norman, D.A., Categorisation of action slips, Psychological Review, 88, 1981, pp. 1–15

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Ravindra, M.K., Gross errors, seismic margins and seismic PRAs, Modeling Human Error in Structural Design and Construction, ASCE, Ann Arbor, Mi, 1986, pp.113–121

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fitzsimmons, N., On modeling errors in the construction industry, Modeling Human Error in Structural Design and Construction, ASCE, Ann Arbor, Mi, 1986, pp. 190–194

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kletz, T., An Engineer’s View of Human Error, 2nd Edition, London: Institution of Chemical Engineers, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bañares-Alcántara, R., Representing the engineering design process: two hypotheses, Computer-aided Design, 23, 1991, pp.595–603

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. McMahon, C.A., Observations on modes of incremental change in design, Journal of Engineering Design, 5(3), 1994, pp. 195–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McMahon, C.A., Cooke, J.A. and North, M.R., A classification of errors in design, International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED’97, Tampere, 1997, pp.119–124

    Google Scholar 

  16. Prabhu, P., Sharit, J. and Drury, C., Classification of temporal errors in CIM systems: development of a framework for deriving human-centred information requirements, International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 5(2), 1992, pp.68–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Busby, J.S., Why designers don’t learn effectively from feedback, International Conference on Engineering Design, ICED’97, Tampere, 1997, pp. 105–110.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cooke, J.A., McMahon, C.A., North, M.R. (2003). Sources of Error in the Design Process. In: Gogu, G., Coutellier, D., Chedmail, P., Ray, P. (eds) Recent Advances in Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0161-7_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0161-7_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-6236-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-017-0161-7

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics