Alexander, R. (2000). Culture & Pedagogy: International Comparisons in Primary Education. Oxford: Blackwell.
Anderson, L. W., Ryan, D., & Shapiro, B. (1989). The IEA classroom environment study. New York: Pergamon.
Anderson-Levitt, K. M. (2002). Teaching culture as national and transnational: A response to teachers’ work.
Educational Researcher,
31(3), 19–21.
CrossRefAtkin, J. M., & Black, P. (1996). Changing the Subject: Innovations in Science, Mathematics, and Technology Education. London and Paris: Routledge and the OECD (cited in Atkin and Black, 1997).
Atkin, J. M., & Black, P. (1997). Policy perils of international comparisons. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(1), 22–28.
Baker, D. P. (1997). Surviving TIMSS or, everything you blissfully forgot about international comparisons. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, December issue, 295–300.
Barnes, M., Clarke, D. J., & Stephens, W. M. (2000). Assessment as the engine of systemic reform.
Journal of Curriculum Studies,
32(5), 623–650.
CrossRefBattista, M. T. (1999). Geometry results from the third international mathematics and science study. Teaching Children Mathematics, 5, February issue, 367–373.
Beaton, A. E., Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. I., Kelly, D. I., & Smith, T. A. (1996). Mathematics Achievement in the Middle School Years: IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
Beaton, A. E., & Robitaille, D. F. (1999). An overview of the third international mathematics and science study. Chapter 3. In G. Kaiser, E. Luna & I. Huntley (Eds.), International Comparisons in Mathematics Education (pp. 19–29). London: Falmer Press.
Beller, M., & Gafni, N. (1996). The 1991 International Assessment of Educational Progress in Mathematics and Sciences: The Gender Differences Perspective.
Journal of Educational Psychology,
88(2), 365–377.
CrossRefBracey, G. W. (1997). On comparing the incomparable: A response to Baker and Stedman. Educational Researcher, 26(4), 19–26.
Bracey, G. W. (1998). TIMSS, rhymes with ‘dims’, as in ‘witted’. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, May issue, 686–687.
Campbell, P. F., & Silver, E. A. (1999). Teaching and Learning Mathematics in Poor Communities. Reston, Virginia: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Cheng, Y. C., & Cheung, W. M. (1999). Lessons from TIMSS in Europe: An observation from Asia.
Educational Research and Evaluation,
5(2), 227–236.
CrossRefClarke, D. J. (1996). Assessment. Chapter 9, in A. Bishop (Ed.), International Handbook of Mathematics Education (pp. 327–370). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
Clarke, D. J. (Ed.) (2001). Perspectives on Practice and Meaning in Mathematics and Science Classrooms. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Clarke, D. J. (2002). The learner’s perspective study: Exploiting the potential for complementary analyses. Paper presented as part of the symposium ‘Primary Research, Secondary Research and Research Synthesis: Theory, Value and Linkage’ at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, April 2–5, 2002. Copies available at
http://www.edfac.unimelb.edu.au/DSlvlfi/rescarch/lps.
Cohen, D. (1998). World league tables: What’s the score? Principal Matters, 10(1), 3–7.
Forgione, P. D. (1998). Responses to frequently asked questions about 12th-grade TIMSS. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, June issue, 769–772.
Freudenthal, H. (1975). Pupils’ achievements internationally compared — the IEA.
Educational Studies in Mathematics,
6, 127–186.
CrossRefFuller, B., & Clarke, P. (1994). Raising school effects while ignoring culture? Local conditions and the influence of classroom tools, rules, and pedagogy. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 119–157.
Garden, R. A. (1999). Development of the TIMSS performance assessment tasks.
Studies in Educational Evaluation,
25(3), 217–241.
CrossRefGombrich, E. H. (1995). The Story of Art. Fifteenth Edition. London: Phaidon Press.
Gough, P. B. (1997). Call of the horse race. Phi Delta Kappan, 79, 178.
Hatano, G., & Inagaki, K. (1998). Cultural contexts of schooling revisited: A review of the learning gap from a cultural psychology perspective. Chapter 3. In S. G. Paris & H. M. Wellman (Eds.),
Global Prospects for Education: Development, Culture and Schooling (pp. 79–104). Washington, D. C.; American Psychological Association.
CrossRefHess, R. D., & Azuma, H. (1991). Cultural support for schooling: Contrasts between Japan and the United States. Educational Researcher, 20(9), 2–8, 12.
Hu, A. (2000, December). TIMSS: Arthur Hu’s index. [On line] Available:
http://www.leconsulting.com/arthurhu/index/timss.htm. (December 30, 2000). Cited in Wang (2001).
Kaiser, G., Luna, E., & Huntley, J. (Eds.) (1999). International Comparisons in Mathematics Education. London: Falmer Press.
Kawanaka, T., & Stigler, J. W. (1999). Teachers’ use of questions in eighth-grade mathematics classrooms in Germany, Japan, and the United State s.
Mathematical Thinking and Learning,
1 (4), 255–278.
CrossRefKeeves, J. P. (1995). The case for international comparisons. Chapter 10. In I. L. Lane (Ed.), Ferment in Education: A Look Abroad (pp. 169–189). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Keitel, C., & Kilpatrick, J. (1999). The rationality and irrationality of international comparative studies. Chapter 16. In G. Kaiser, E. Luna & I. Huntley (Eds.), International Comparison s in Mathematics Education (pp. 241–256). London: Falmer Press.
Lather, P. (1999). To be of use: The work of reviewing. Review of Educational Research, 69(1), 2–7.
LeTendre, G., Baker, D., Akiba, M., Goesling, B., & Wiseman, A. (2001). Teachers’ work: Institutional isomorphism and cultural variation in the U.S., Germany, and Japan.
Educational Researcher,
30(6), 3–15.
CrossRefLeTendre, G., Baker, D., Akiba, M., Goesling, B., & Wiseman, A. (2002). Response to K. AndersonLevitt’s rejoinder.
Educational Researcher,
31(3), 22–23.
CrossRefLokan, J. (1999). Equity issues in testing: The case of TIMSS performance assessment.
Studies in Educational Evaluation,
25, 297–314.
CrossRefLokan, J., Ford, P., & Greenwood, L. (1996). Maths and Science on the Line: Australian Junior Secondary Students’ Performance in the Third International Math ematics and Science Study. Melbourne: ACER.
Lokan, J., Ford, P., & Greenwood, L. (1997). Maths and Science on the Line: Australian Middle Primary Students’ Performance in the Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Melbourne: ACER.
Lokan, J., & Greenwood, L. (2001). Maths and Science on the Line: Australian Year 12 Students’ Performance in the Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Melbourne: ACER.
Mislevy, R. J. (1995). What can we learn from international assessments? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(4), 419–437.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Beaton, A. E., Gonzalez, E. J., Kelly, D. L., & Smith, T. A. (1998). Mathematics and Science Achievement in the Final Year of Secondary School: IEA’s Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College.
Orpwood, G. W. F., & Garden, R. A. (1998). Assessing Mathematics and Science Literacy. Vancouver: Pacific Educational Press.
Raby, R. L. (2000). Comparative and international education: A bibliography (1999).
Comparative Education Review,
44(3), 381–419.
CrossRefRose, L. C. (1998). Who cares? And so what? Guest editorial in Phi Delta Kappan, 79, June issue, 722, 800.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1987). Confessions of an accidental theorist. For the Learning of Mathematics, 7(1), 30–38.
Scholle, D. (1992). Authority on the left: Critical pedagogy, postmodernism and vital strategies.
Cultural Studies,
6(2), 271–289.
CrossRefSchmidt, W. H., Jorde, D., Cogan, L S., Barrier, E., Gonzalo, I., Moser, U., Shimizu, K., Sawada, T., Valverde, G. A., McKnight, C, Prawat, R. S., Wiley, D. E., Raizen, S. A., Britton, E. D., & Wolfe, R. G. (1996). Characterizing Pedagogical Flow: An Investigation of Mathematics and Science Teaching in Six Coumries. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., & Raizen, S. A. (1997). A Splintered Vision: An Investigation of U.S Science and Mathematics Education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Schmidt, W. H., McKnight, C. C., Valverde, G. A., Houang, R. T., & Wiley, D. E. (1997).
Many Visions, Many Aims. Volume 1: A Cross–National Investigation of Curricular Intentions in School Mathematics. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
CrossRefScollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (1995). Intercultural Communication: A discourse approach. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell.
Shimahara, N., & Sakai, A. (1995). Learning to Teach in Two Cultures. New York: Garland Publishing.
Shimizu, Y. (1999). Studying sample lessons rather than one excellent lesson: A Japanese perspective on the TIMSS video tape classroom study. Zentralblatt für Didactikder Mathematik, 6, 191–195
Shimizu, Y. (2002a). Capturing the structure of Japanese mathematics lessons: Some findings of the international comparative studies. Paper presented at the ICMI-Second East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education and Ninth Southeast Asian Conference on Mathematics Education, 27–31 May 2002, National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University,
Singapore (From
http://www.edfac.unimelb.edu).au/DSME/research/lps.
Shimizu, Y. (2002b). Discrepancies in perception s of lesson structure between the teacher and the students in the mathematics classroom. Paper presented at the interactive symposium, ‘International Perspectives on Mathematics Classrooms’, at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, April 1–5, 2002. Copies available at
http://www.edfac.unimelb.edu.au/DSME/research/lps.
Spindler, G. (1987). Cultural dialogue and schooling in Schoenhausen and Roseville: A comparative analysis.
Anthropology and Education Quarterly,
18(1), 3–16.
CrossRefStedman, L. C. (1997). International achievement differences: An assessment of a new perspective. Educational Researcher, 26(3), 4–15.
Ste venson, H. W., & Stigler, J. W. (1992). The Learning Gap: Why Our Schools Are Failing and What We Can Learn from Japanese and Chinese Education. New York: Touchstone.
Stigler, J., Gallimore, R., & Hiebert, J. (2000). Using video surveys to compare classrooms and teaching across cultures: Examples and lessons from the TIMSS video studies.
Educational Psychologist,
35(2), 87–100.
CrossRefStigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1997). Understanding an d improving classroom mathematics instruction: An overview of the TIMSS video study. Phi Delta Kappan, 79(1), 14–21.
Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The Teaching Gap New York: Simon & Schuster.
Tarr, J. E., Mittag, K. C., Uekawa, K., & Lennex, L. (2000). A comparison of calcula to ruse in eighth-grade mathematics classrooms in the United States, Japan, and Portugal: Result s from the Third International Mathematics and Science Study.
School Science and Mathematics,
100(3), 139–150.
CrossRefThomas, R. M. (Ed.) (1990). International Comparative Education: Practices. Issues. and Prospects. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Thorsten, M. (2000). Once upon a TIMSS: American and Japanese narrations of the Third International Mathematics and Science Study. Education and Society, 18(3), 45–76.
Tobin, J., Wu, D., & Davidson, D. (1989). Preschools in Three Cultures: Japan, China and the United States. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
U.S. Department of Education (1997). Attaining Excellence: TIMSS as a Starting Point to Examine U.S. Education. Washington: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
Van den Heuvl-Panhuizen, M. (1998). Gender differences in mathematics achievements in Dutch primary schools: On the search for features of mathematics education that are important for girls. In C. Keitel (Ed.), Social Justice and Mathematics Education: Gender, Class, Ethnicity and the Politics of Schooling (pp. 135–149). Berlin: Freie Universität Berlin & IOWME.
Wang, J. (1998). International achievement comparison: Interesting debates on inconclusive findings.
School Science and Mathematics,
98(7), 376–382.
CrossRefWang, J. (2001). TIMSS primary and middle school data: Some technical concerns.
Educational Researcher,
30(6), 17–21.
CrossRefWatanabe, T. (2001). Content and organization of teacher’s manuals: An analysis of Japanese elementary mathematics teacher’s manuals.
School Science and Mathematics,
101(4), 194– 201.
CrossRefWebb, N. L. (1997). Determining alignment of expectations and assessments in mathematics and science education. NISE Brief, 1(2), 1–8.
Westbury, I. (1992). Comparing American and Japanese achievement: Is the United States really alow achiever? Educational Resarcher, June–July, pp. 18–24.
Westbury I., Ethington C.A., Sosniak L.A., & Baker D.P. (Eds.) (1994). In Search of More Effective Mathematics Education: Examining Data from the IEA Second International Mathematics Study. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
White, M. (1987). The Japanese Educational Challenge: A Commitment to Children. New York: The Free Press. Cited in Watanabe (2001).