Skip to main content

What Is a City? An Essential Definition for Sustainability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Urbanization and Sustainability

Part of the book series: Human-Environment Interactions ((HUEN,volume 3))

Abstract

The debate over the definition of the city and the elements of the urbanization process has a long history in the social sciences. These debates highlighted the significant differences in social outcomes between studies that defined cities as social entities and those that examined cities as strictly social processes. With increasing interest in environmental and resource management concerns, the debate over what a city is and what are the processes of urbanization have taken on even greater importance. While, in one sense, it has become easier to identify “the urban” due to new imaging and mapping technologies, taking the definition of cities as simply entities has important consequences for our ability to identify sustainable pathways. There is much that environmental and ecological studies can bring to the definition of the city, but a there is also much that these studies can learn from previous social research. By focusing on cities as entities and ignoring social processes, these new studies may conflate numerous developmental processes, and at the same time ignore the fundamental aspects that define the urban, resulting in a misunderstanding of social, economic and environmental consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This term is suggested as an alternative to “Anthropocene,” as anthropos (humans) are fundamentally and primarily astos (urban).

References

  • Amin, A., & Graham, S. (1999). Cities of connection and disconnection. In J. Allen, D. Massey, & M. Pryke (Eds.),Unsettling cities(pp. 7–38). London: Routledge in association with The Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bairoch, P. (1988).Cities and economic development, from the dawn of history to the present.Chicago: (Translated by Christopher Braider) University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, B. J. L. (1973).The human consequences of urbanization. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockerhoff, M. P. (2000). An urbanizing world.Population Bulletin, 55(3), 1–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L. (2001).Eco-economy, building an economy for the earth. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, L., & Jacobson, J. L. (1987).The future of urbanization: Facing the ecological and ­economic constraints. Washington, DC: Worldwatch Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. A., Southworth, F., & Sarzynski, A. (2008).Shrinking the carbon footprint of Metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute Metropolitan Policy Program.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, H. (1983).An introduction to urban historical geography. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase-Dunn, C. K. (1975). The system of world cities, A.D. 800–1975. In M. Timberlake (Ed.),Urbanization in the world-economy( pp. 269–292). London: Academic Press, Inc`.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase-Dunn, C. K., & Manning, E. S. (2002). City systems and world systems: Four millennia of city growth and decline.Cross-Cultural Research, 36(4), 379–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Childe, V. G. (1950). The urban revolution.Town Planning Review, 21(1), 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J. P., Kinzig, A., Grimm, N. B., Fagan, W. F., Hope, D., Wu, J., & Borer, E. T. (2000). A new urban economy.American Scientist, 88(5), 416–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbyn, Z. (2010, July 16). Ecologists shun the urban jungle; Only one in six papers tackles ­inhabited areas.Nature. doi: 10.1038/news.2010.359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1972). World urbanization 1950–1970: The urban situation in the world as a whole.World Urbanization(Population Monograph Series no. 9). Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodman, D. (2009). Blaming cities for climate change? An analysis of urban greenhouse gas emissions inventories.Environment and Urbanization, 21(1), 185–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodman, D., & Satterthwaite, D. (2009, March 12–13). Are cities really to blame?Urban world.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, I. (1981). The city as an ecosystem.Progress in Physical Geography, 5(3), 315–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1984) [orig. 1893].The division of labor in society. New York: (Translated by W.D. Halls) Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R. T. T., & Godron, M. (1986).Landscape ecology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. (1986). The world city hypothesis.Development and Change, 17, 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. (2002).The prospect of cities. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J., & Miller, J. (1965). The urban field.Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 31(4), 312–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, D. (1978). Capitalist development and the history of American cities. In W. K. Tabb & L. Sawers (Eds.),Marxism and the metropolis(pp. 25–63). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottmann, J. (1961).Megalopolis: The Urbanized Northeastern Seaboard of the United States. Vol. The Twentieth Century Fund,New York. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottmann, J. (1976). Megalopolitan systems around the world.Ekistics, 243, 109–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grimm, N. B., Grove, J. M., Pickett, S. T. A., & Redman, C. L. (2000). Integrated approaches to long-term studies of urban ecological systems.BioScience, 50(7), 571–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1989).The urban experience. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1990).The condition of postmodernity. Cambridge: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Institute for Urban Strategies. (2010).Global power city index 2010. Tokyo: The Mori Memorial Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1969).The economy of cities. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (2003).The urban revolution. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo, F.-c., & Yeung, Y.-m. (Eds.) (1998).Globalization and the world of large cities. Tokyo: United Nations University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machlis, G. E., Force, J. E., William, J., & Burch, R. (1997). The human ecosystem part I: The human ecosystem as an organization concept in ecosystem management.Society & Natural Resources, 10, 347–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maine, H. (1861).Ancient law. New York: H. Holt and company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcotullio, P. J. (2005).Time-space telescoping and urban environmental transitions in the Asia Pacific. Yokohama: United Nations University Institute of Advanced Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcotullio, P. J., de Sherbinin, A. & Baptista, S. (2012). Urbanization, poverty and ecosystem degradation. In F. DeClerck, J. C. Ingram & C. R. del Rio (Eds.),Integrating Ecology into Poverty Alleviation and International Development Efforts: A Practical Guide. Springer Verlag, pp. 101–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. S. (1996). The age of extremes: Concentrated affluence and poverty in the twenty-first century.Demography, 33(4), 395–412.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, M. J., & Pickett, S. T. A. (1991). Comparative analysis of ecosystems along gradients of urbanization: Opportunities and limitations. In J. J. Cole, G. M. Lovett, & S. E. G. Findlay (Eds.),Comparative analyses of ecosystems, patterns, mechanisms and theories(pp. 351–255). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, M. J., Pickett, S. T. A., Groffman, P., Bohlen, P., Pouyat, R. V., Zipperer, W. C., Parmelee, R. W., Carreiro, M. M., & Medley, K. (1997). Ecosystem processes along an ­urban-to-rural gradient.Urban Ecosystems, 1(1), 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, M. J., Hahs, A. K., & Breuste, J. H. (Eds.). (2009).Ecology of cities and towns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, T. G. (1991). The emergence ofDesakotaregions in Asia: Expanding a hypothesis. In N. Ginsburg, B. Koppel, & T. G. McGee (Eds.),The extended metropolis, settlement transition in Asia(pp. 3–25). Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGee, T. G. (1995). Metrofitting the emerging mega-urban regions of ASEAN. In T. G. McGee & I. M. Robinson (Eds.),The mega-urban regions of Southeast Asia(pp. 3–26). Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGranahan, G., Marcotullio, P. J., et al. (2005). Urban systems, Chapter 27. In Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (Ed.),Current state and trends: Findings of the condition and trends working group. Ecosystems and human well-being(Vol. 1, pp. 795–825). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005).Ecosystems and human well-being, Vol. 1 Current state and trends. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NcIntyre, N. E., Knowles-Yanez, K., & Hope, D. (2000). Urban ecology as an interdisciplinary field: Differences in the use of “urban” between the social and natural sciences.Urban Ecosystems, 4(1), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum, E. (1991). Earth stewardship.Pan Ecology, 6(5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacione, M. (2001).Urban geography, a global perspective. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Peter, J. Marcotullio, P. J., de Sherbinin, A., & Baptista, S. (2012). Urbanization, poverty and ecosystem degradation. In F. DeClerck, J. C. Ingram, & C. Rumbaitis del Rio (Eds.), Integrating ecology into poverty alleviation and international development efforts: A practical guide (pp. 101–124). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redfield, R. (1953).Primitive world and its transformations. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. (2002). Global and world cities: A view from off the map.International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 26(3), 531–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. (2004). In the tracks of comparative urbanism: Difference, urban modernity and the primitive.Urban Geography, 25(8), 709–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (1991).The global city: New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. (1994).Cities in a world economy. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satterthwaite, D. (2007). The transition to a predominantly urban world and its underpinnings.IIED Human settlements discussion paper series. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, A., Friedl, M. A., & Potere, D. (2009). A new map of global urban extent from MODIS satellite data.Environmental Research Letters, 4(044003), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seto, K. C., Sanchez-Rodriquez, R., & Fragkias, M. (2010). The new geography of contemporary urbanization and the environment.Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35(4), 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Short, J. R., & Kim, Y.-H. (1999).Globalization and the city. London: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, G. (1997) [orig. 1903]. The metropolis and mental life. In D. Frisby & M. Featherstone (Eds.),Simmel on culture. London: Sage Publisher.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skole, D. L. (2004). Geography as a great intellectual melting pot and the preeminent ­interdisciplinary environmental discipline.Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(4), 739–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. W. (2000).Postmetropolis, critical studies of cities and regions. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srinivas, H. (2000). Focusing on the real environmental culprits – Urban areas: UNU’s City Inspirations Initiative.Global Environmental Change, 10, 233–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stage, J., Stage, J., & McGranahan, G. (2009).Is urbanization contributing to higher food prices?London: International Institute for Environment and Development and UNFPA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sterns, F., & Montag, T. (Eds.). (1974).The urban ecosystem: A holistic approach. Stroudsburg: Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, G. W. (1906).Folkways. Boston: Ginn Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, P. C., Anderson, S. J., Elvidge, C. D., Tuttle, B. T., & Ghosh, T. (2009). Paving the planet: Impervious surface as a proxy of human ecological footprint.Progress in Physical Geography, 33(4), 510–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P. J. (2004).World city network, a global urban analysis. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timberlake, M. (2010). Introduction: What are cities? In R. Paddison & M. Timberlake (Eds.),Urban studies, economy, Vol. 1, What are cities?(pp. xxxiii–xl). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tisdale, H. (1942). The process of urbanization.Social Forces, 20(3), 311–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tonnies, F. (1955) [orig. 1887].Community and society. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFPA. (2007).State of the world population: Unleashing the potential of urban growth. New York: United Nations Population Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. (1996).Our ecological footprint. Gabriola Island: New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webber, M. (1963). Order in diversity: Community without propinquity. In L. Wingo (Ed.),Cities and space: The future use of urban land. Baltimore: John Hopkins Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1958).The city. New York: (Translated and edited by D. Martindale and G. Neuwirth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, A. F. (1967) [orig. 1899].The growth of cities in the nineteenth century, a study in statistics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press (Originally published by Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheatley, P. (1971).The pivot of the four quarters: Preliminary enquiry into the origins and ­character of the ancient Chinese City. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M., & White, L. (1962).The intellectual versus the city, from Thomas Jefferson to Frank Lloyd Wright. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, L. (1938). Urbanism as a way of life.American Journal of Sociology, 44(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolman, M. G. (2004). The more things change.Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(4), 723–728.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter J. Marcotullio .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Marcotullio, P.J., Solecki, W. (2013). What Is a City? An Essential Definition for Sustainability. In: Boone, C., Fragkias, M. (eds) Urbanization and Sustainability. Human-Environment Interactions, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5666-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics