Learning in European agricultural and rural networks: building a systemic research agenda
Purchase on Springer.com
$29.95 / €24.95 / £19.95*
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Six key themes that emerged from the European Union (EU) funded LEARNing project designed to develop and test a systemic approach to research practice are reported. The focus was on the learning and knowing processes experienced by individuals, groups and institutions that emerges from collective action and results in changes in practices or in the potential to change practices of those involved. The authors, drawn by the idea that the key to understanding knowledge is to be found in ‘how we know what we know’, or, in other words, in the processes of ‘learning and knowing’ present these themes: processes, theory, evaluation, institutionalisation and social and professional practice as a basis for further innovation in the conduct of R&D and as a basis for future capability-building of researchers.
- Blackmore, C. P. (Ed.). (2010). Social learning systems and communities of practice. London: Springer/Open University.
- Blackmore, C. P., Cerf, M., Ison, R. L., & Paine, M. (2012). The role of action-oriented learning theories for change in agriculture and rural networks. In I. Darnhofer, D. Gibbon, & B. Dedieu (Eds.), Farming Systems Research into the 21st century: The new dynamic (pp. 159–177). Dordrecht: Springer.
- Collins, K. B., & Ison, R. L. (2009). Jumping off Arnstein’s ladder: Social learning as a new policy paradigm for climate change adaptation. Environmental Policy and Governance, 19, 358–373. CrossRef
- Collins, K. B., Ison, R. L., & Blackmore, C. P. (2005). River basin planning project: Social learning (Phase 1). Bristol: Environment Agency. From www.environment-agency.gov.uk
- Gibbons, M., & Nowotny, H. (2001). The potential of transdisciplinarity. In J. Thompson Klein, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, R. Häberli, A. Bill, R. W. Scholz, & M. Welti (Eds.), Transdisciplinarity: Joint problem solving among science, technology, and society. An effective way for managing complexity (pp. 67–80). Basel: Birkhäuser Verlag.
- Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge – The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.
- Hatchuel, A., & Weil, B. (1999). Design-oriented organisations. Towards a unified theory of design activities. In 6th New Product Development Conference. Cambridge, UK.
- Hirsch Hadorn, G., Hofmann-Riem, H., Biber-Klemm, S., Grossenbacher-Mansuy, W., Joye, D., Pohl, C., Wiesmann, U., & Zemp, E. (Eds.). (2008). Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Dordrecht: Springer.
- Hubert, B., & Bonnemaire, J. (2000). La construction des objets dans la recherche interdisciplinaire finalisée: De nouvelles exigences pour l’évaluation. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 8, 5–19. CrossRef
- Ison, R. L. (2010). Systems practice: How to act in a climate change world. London: Springer. CrossRef
- Ison, R. L., & Russell, D. B. (2000). Exploring some distinctions for the design of learning systems. Cybernetics and Human Knowing, 7, 43–56.
- Ison, R. L., & Russell, D. B. (2007). Agricultural extension and rural development: Breaking out of knowledge transfer traditions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Ison, R. L., Steyaert, P., Roggero, P., Hubert, B., & Jiggins, J. (2004). Social learning for the integrated management and sustainable use of water at catchment scale. Final Report (EVK1-2000-00695SLIM). Available at http://slim.open.ac.uk
- Ison, R. L., Röling, N., & Watson, D. (2007). Challenges to science and society in the sustainable management and use of water: Investigating the role of social learning. Environmental Science and Policy, 10, 499–511. CrossRef
- Ison, R. L, Blackmore, C. P., & Iaquinto, B. (2012). Social learning: Exploring the revealing and concealing aspects of contemporary metaphors. Ecological Economics (to be submitted).
- LEARN. (2000). Cow up a Tree. Knowing and learning processes for change in agriculture, case studies from industrial countries. Versailles: INRA Editions.
- Morriss, S., Paine, M., Parminter, T., Sheath, G., & Wilkinson, R. (2002). Achieving agri-environmental policy outcomes using models of institutional change. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 8, 127–137. CrossRef
- Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2001). Re-thinking science: Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
- Open University. (2000). Managing complexity. A systems approach (T306). The Open University, Walton Hall.
- Pohl, C., & Hirsch Hadorn, G. (2007). Principles for designing transdisciplinary research – Proposed by the Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences (A. Zimmermann, Trans.). Munich: Oekom Verlag.
- Pohl, C., & Hirsch Hadorn, G. (2008). Methodological challenges of transdisciplinary research. Natures Sciences Sociétés, 16, 111–121. CrossRef
- SLIM. (2004). SLIM framework: Social learning as a policy approach for sustainable use of water. Available at http://slim.open.ac.uk
- Steyaert, P., & Jiggins, J. (2007). Governance of complex environmental situations through social learning: A synthesis of SLIM’s lessons for research, policy and practice. Environmental Science and Policy, 10, 575–586. CrossRef
- Wilkinson, J. (1992). Talking with African writers: Interviews with African poets, playwrights and novelists (Studies in African literature series). London: Heinemann.
- Winograd, T., & Flores, F. (1987). Understanding computers and cognition: A new foundation for design. New York: Addison Wesley.
- Learning in European agricultural and rural networks: building a systemic research agenda
- Book Title
- Farming Systems Research into the 21st Century: The New Dynamic
- pp 179-200
- Print ISBN
- Online ISBN
- Springer Netherlands
- Copyright Holder
- Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- eBook Packages
- Editor Affiliations
- ID2. Livelihood Systems, Agricultural and Rural
- ID3. , SAD, INRA
- Author Affiliations
- 1. INRA Department Sciences for Action and Development, Paris, France
- 2. Communication & Systems Department, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
- 3. Monash Sustainability Institute, Monash University, Clayton, Australia
- 4. Department of Urban and Rural Development, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
To view the rest of this content please follow the download PDF link above.