Skip to main content

Sexual Harassment: “Is It Just Me or Are You Hot?”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life ((IHQL))

Abstract

This chapter reviews what constitutes sexual harassment, its prevalence in the US workforce, its potential causes, and the detrimental effects it has on victims, victims’ work groups, and their organizations as a whole. Situational and individual predictors of sexual harassment are explored. Also included is a review of how employee rights and quality of work life, as well the organizational bottom line, are jeopardized by the occurrence of sexual harassment. Ultimately, the authors conclude that sexual harassment is a significant problem facing organizations today. Even the most carefully developed, well-intentioned preventative measures are unlikely to completely prevent it. Programs for preventing sexual harassment are discussed along with recommendations for stopping sexual harassment, restoring employee quality of work life, and minimizing legal exposure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Small businesses are exempt if they have fewer than 15 total employees on the payroll for at least four and one-half months out of the year in question (EEOC & Walters v. Metropolitan Educational Enterprises, 1997).

References

  • Barrett v. Omaha National Bank, 726 F.2d 424, 33 EPD 34,132. (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastian, L. D., Lancaster, A. R., & Reyest, H. E. (1996). Department of Defense 1995 sexual harassment survey (Publication No. 96-014). Arlington, VA: Defense Manpower Data Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M. P., Quick, J. C., & Cycyota, C. S. (2002). Assessment and prevention of sexual harassment of employees: An applied guide to creating healthy organizations. International Journal of Selection & Assessment, 10(1–2), 160–167. Retrieved from http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0965–075X

  • Berdahl, J. L. (2007). The sexual harassment of uppity women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(2), 425–437. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berdahl, J. L., & Aquino, K. (2009). Sexual behavior at work: Fun or folly? Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 34–47. doi:10.1037/a0012981.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, M. E., Langhout, R. D., Palmieri, P. A., Cortina, L. M., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (2002). The (un)reasonableness of reporting: Antecedents and consequences of reporting sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 230–242. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2005.tb02156.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisom-Rapp, S. (2001). An ounce of prevention is a poor substitute for a pound of cure: Confronting the developing jurisprudence of education and prevention in employment discrimination law. Berkeley Journal of Employment and Labor Law, 22(1). Retrieved from http://www.bjell.org/

  • Boland, M. L. (2005). Sexual harassment in the workplace. Naperville, IL: Sphinx Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. D. (1993). When counseling is not enough: The ninth circuit requires employers to discipline sexual harassers. Washington University Law Quarterly, 71, 901–919.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burlington Industries v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742. (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, D. K.-S., Lam, C. B., Chow, S. Y., & Cheung, S. F. (2008). Examining the job-related, psychological, and physical outcomes of workplace sexual harassment: A meta-analytic review. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(4), 362–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Civil Rights Act of 1991. (1991). P.L. 102–166, 105 stat. 1071.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collinsworth, L. L., Fitzgerald, L. F., & Dragow, F. (2009). In harm’s way: Factors related to psycho­logical distress following sexual harassment. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33(4), 475–490. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01525.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Haas, S., Timmerman, G., & Höing, M. (2009). Sexual harassment and health among male and female police officers. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 14(4), 390–401. doi:10.1037/a0017046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donovan, M. A., & Drasgow, F. (1999). Do men’s and women’s experience of sexual harassment differ? An examination of the differential test functioning of the sexual experiences questionnaire. Military Psychology, 11(3), 265–282. doi:10.1207/s15327876mp1103_4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, C. L. Z., Knapp, D. E., Faley, R. H., & Kustis, G. A. (1998). An empirical examination of same- and other-gender sexual harassment in the workplace. Sex Roles, 39(9–10), 731–749. doi:10.1023/A:1018860101629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 111(1), 3–22. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.1.3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkins, T. J., Phillips, J. S., & Ward, S. G. (2008). Organizational sexual harassment investigations: Observers’ perceptions of fairness. Journal of Managerial Issues, 20(1), 88–108. http://www.pittstate.edu/department/economics/journal-of-managerial-issues/

    Google Scholar 

  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (EEOC) (1980). Guidelines on discrimination because of sex. Federal Register, 45, 746–777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (EEOC) (1990a). Policy guidance on current issues of sexual harassment (N-915-050). Retrieved March 30, 2012, from http://eeoc.gov/policy/docs/currentissues.html

  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (EEOC) (1990b). Policy guidance on employer liability under Title VII for sexual favoritism (N-915.048). Retrieved March 30, 2012, from http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/sexualfavor.html

  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (EEOC) (1994). Enforcement guidance on Harris v. Forklift Sys., Inc (92-1168 slip op). Retrieved March 30, 2012, from http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/harris.html

  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (EEOC) (1996, April). EEOC chairman comments on lawsuit against Mitsubishi. Retrieved March 30, 2012, from http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/4-22-96.cfm

  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (EEOC) (1999). Enforcement guidance: Vicarious employer liability for unlawful harassment by supervisors (915.002). Retrieved March 30, 2012, from http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/harassment.html

  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (EEOC) (2009). Cheesecake factory settles EEOC suit in case of severe same-sex sexual harassment. Retrieved March 30, 2012, from: http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/newsroom/release/11-10-09.cfm

  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (EEOC) (2010). Sexual harassment charges EEOC & FEPAs combined: FY 1997–FY 2010. Retrieved March 30, 2012, from: http://www.eeoc.gov/eeoc/statistics/enforcement/sexual_harassment.cfm

  • Equal Employment Opportunity Commission & Walters v. Metropolitan Educational Enterprises, Inc., 117 S. Ct. 660. (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  • Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775. (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., Gelfand, M. J., & Magley, V. J. (1997). Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(4), 578–589. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.4.578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, L. F., Gelfand, M. J., & Drasgow, F. (1995). Measuring sexual harassment: Theoretical and psychometric advances. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(4), 425–445. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1704_2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, L. F., Swan, S., & Fischer, K. (1995). Why didn’t she just report him? The psychological and legal implications of women’s responses to sexual harassment. The Journal of Social Issues, 51(1), 117–138. Retrieved from http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0022-4537

  • Foote, W. E., & Goodman-Delahunty, J. (2005). Evaluating sexual harassment: Psychological, social, and legal considerations in forensic examinations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10827-000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, E. D. (1999). Maneuvering through the labyrinth: The employer’s paradox in responding to hostile environment sexual harassment – A proposed way out. Fordham Law Review, 67(4), 1517–1608. Retrieved from http://fordhamlawreview.org

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, M. J., Fitzgerald, L. F., & Drasgow, F. (1995). The structure of sexual harassment: A confirmatory factor analysis across cultures and settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 47, 164–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gesaman, K. (2010, January 13). Abuse of power. Newsweek. Retrieved from http://www.newsweek.com

  • Glomb, T. M., Munson, L. J., Hulin, C. L., Bergman, M. E., & Drasgow, F. (1999). Structural equation models of sexual harassment: Longitudinal explorations and cross-sectional generalizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(1), 14–28. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.1.14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glomb, T. M., Richman, W. L., Hulin, C. L., Drasgow, F., Schneider, K. T., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1997). Ambient sexual harassment: An integrated model of antecedents and consequences. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 71(3), 309–328. doi:10.1006/obhd.1997.2728.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gruber, J. E. (1998). The impact of male work environments and organizational policies on women’s experiences of sexual harassment. Gender and Society, 12, 301–320. doi:10.1177/0891243298012003004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. A. (1985). Sex and the workplace: The impact of sexual behavior and harassment on women, men, and organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. A., Cohen, A., & Konrad, A. (1990). Predicting social-sexual behavior at work: A contact hypothesis. Academy of Management Journal, 33(3), 560–577. doi:10.2307/256581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gutek, B. A., O’Connor, M. A., Melançon, R., Stockdale, M. S., Geer, T. M., & Done, R. S. (1999). The utility of the reasonable woman legal standard in hostile environment sexual harassment cases: A multimethod, multistudy examination. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5(3), 596–629. doi:10.1037/1076-8971.5.3.596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc., 510 U.S. 17. (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewlett, S. A., Peraino, K., Sherbin, L., & Sumberg, K. (2011, January 12). The sponsor effect: Breaking through the last glass ceiling. The Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from http://hbr.org/

  • Ilies, R., Hauserman, N., Schwochau, S., & Stibal, J. (2003). Reported incidence rates of work-related sexual harassment in the United States: Using meta-analysis to explain reported rate disparities. Personnel Psychology, 56(3), 607–631. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00752.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearney, L. K., Rochlen, A. B., & King, E. B. (2004). Male gender role conflict, sexual harassment tolerance, and the efficacy of a psychoeducative training program. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 5(1), 72–82. doi:10.1037/1524-9220.5.1.72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenneth, R. J. (2004). ‘Zero tolerance’ for sexual harassment by supervisors in the workplace: Employers don’t have a real choice. Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice, 4, 57–64. doi:10.1300/J158v04n01_04.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, S., & Cortina, L. M. (2005). Interpersonal mistreatment in the workplace: The interface and impact of general incivility and sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(3), 483–496. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, C. A. (1997). Sexual harassment of working women. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magley, V. J., Hulin, C. L., Fitzgerald, L. F., & DeNardo, M. (1999). Outcomes of self-labeling sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 390–402. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.84.3.390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mattioli, D. (2010, March 23). Recession spurs harassment claims by men. Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://online.wsj.com

  • McCann, D. F. (2000). Supervisory sexual harassment and employer liability: The third circuit sheds light on vicarious liability and affirmative defenses. Villanova Law Review, 45(4), 767–792. http://www.law.villanova.edu/Academics/Journals/Law%20Review.aspx

  • Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson, 477 U.S. 57. (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller v. Department of Corrections, 36 Cal 4th 446. (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M. S., Koen, C. M., & Crow, S. M. (2008). Harassment: It’s not (all) about sex! Part I: The evolving legal environment. The Health Care Manager, 27(1), 13–22. Retrieved from http://journals.lww.com/healthcaremanagerjournal

  • Mueller, C. W., De Coster, S., & Estes, S. B. (2001). Sexual harassment in the workplace: Unanticipated consequences of modern social control in organizations. Work and Occupations, 28(4), 411–446. doi:10.1177/0730888401028004003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munson, L., Miner, A., & Hulin, C. (2001). Labeling sexual harassment in the military: An extension and replication. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(2), 293–303. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.86.2.293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, C. G., Halpert, J. A., & Cellar, D. F. (2007). Organizational responses for preventing and stopping sexual harassment: Effective deterrents of continued endurance. Sex Roles, 56, 811–822. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9239-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuser, D. J. (2005). How to Conduct Effective Internal Investigations of Workplace Matters. Employee Relations Law Journal, 31(1), 67–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc., 523 US 75. (1998).

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, C., & Boyle, S. (2011). Leadership challenges for women at work. Chief Learning Officer, 10(6), 76–78. Retrieved from http://clomedia.com/

  • Perry, E. L., Kulik, C. T., & Bourhis, A. C. (2004). The reasonable woman standard: Effects on sexual harassment court decisions. Law and Human Behavior, 28(1), 9–27. doi:10.1023/B:LAHU.0000015001.07732.8e.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, E. L., Kulik, C. T., & Schmidtke, J. M. (1998). Individual differences in the effectiveness of sexual harassment awareness training. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(8), 698–723. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01727.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrocelli, W., & Repa, B. K. (2000). Sexual harassment on the job: What it is and how to stop it. Berkeley, CA: Nolo Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, J. B. (1987). Sexual harassment proclivities in men. Sex Roles, 17(5–6), 269–290. doi:10.1007/BF00288453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, J. B., Giedd, J. L., & Williams, K. B. (1995). A social psychological model for predicting sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51(1), 69–84. http://www.wiley.com/bw/journal.asp?ref=0022-4537

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, J. B., LaVite, C. M., & Stoller, L. M. (1993). A social psychological analysis of sexual harassment: The person/situation interaction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42(1), 68–83. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1993.1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragins, B. R., Townsend, B., & Mattis, M. (1998). Gender gap in the executive suite: CEOs and female executives report on breaking the glass ceiling. The Academy of Management Executive, 12(1), 28–42. doi:10.5465/AME.1998.254976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raver, J. L., & Gelfand, M. J. (2005). Beyond the individual team: Linking sexual harassment, team process and team performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 387–400. doi:10.5465/AMJ.2005.17407904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reese, L. A., & Lindenberg, K. E. (2004). Employee satisfaction with sexual harassment policies: The training connection. Public Personnel Management, 33(1), 99–119. Retrieved from http://www.ipma-hr.org/node/21487

  • Richman-Hirsch, W. L., & Glomb, T. M. (2002). Are men affected by the sexual harassment of women? Effects of ambient sexual harassment on men. In J. M. Brett & F. Drasgow (Eds.), The psychology of work: Theoretically based empirical research (pp. 121–140). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, R. K., & Allen, B. M. (1993). Sexual harassment in the workplace: A review of the legal rights and responsibilities of all parties. Public Personnel Management 22(1), 123–135. Retrieved from http://www.ipma-hr.org/node/21487

  • Rudman, L. A., Borgida, E., & Robertson, B. A. (1995). Suffering in silence: Procedural justice versus gender socialization issues in university sexual harassment grievance procedures. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17(4), 519–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sbraga, T. P., & O’Donohue, W. (2000). Sexual harassment. Annual Review of Sex Research, 11, 258–285. Retrieved from http://www.sexscience.org/

  • Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, K. T., Swan, S., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1997). Job-related and psychological effects of sexual harassment in the workplace: Empirical evidence from two organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(3), 401–415. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.3.401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stockdale, M. S., & Bhattacharya, G. (2009). Sexual harassment and the glass ceiling. In M. Barreto & M. K. Ryan (Eds.), The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality (pp. 171–199). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/11863–008.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Street, A. E., Gradus, J. L., Stafford, J., & Kelly, K. (2007). Gender differences in experiences of sexual harassment: Data from a male-dominated environment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75(3), 464–474. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.75.3.464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmerman, G., & Bajema, C. (2000). The impact of organizational culture on perceptions and experiences of sexual harassment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57(2), 188–205. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1999.1741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uggen, C., & Blackstone, A. (2004). Sexual harassment as a gendered expression of power. American Sociological Review, 69, 64–92. doi:10.1177/000312240406900105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Labor, Women’s Bureau. (2009). Quick stats on women workers, 2009. Retrieved March 30, 2012, from http://www.dol.gov/wb/stats/main.htm

  • U.S. Merit Systems Protection Board. (1981). Sexual harassment in the federal workplace: Is it a problem? Washington, DC: GPO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wayte, T., Samra, J., Rubbennolt, J. K., Heuer, L., & Koch, W. J. (2002). Taking psychology and law into the twenty-first century. In J. R. P. Ogloff (Ed.), Taking psychology and law into the twenty-first century (pp. 323–369). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, L. A., Nord, R. D., Mael, F. A., & Young, M. C. (1993). The assessment of background and life experiences (ABLE). In T. Trent & J. H. Laurence (Eds.), Adaptability screening for the armed forces. Washington, DC: Office of Assistant Secretary of Defense (Force Management and Personnel).

    Google Scholar 

  • Willert, S. J. (1998). Sexual harassment: Defining employer’s rights. For the Defense, 40(11), 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willness, C. R., Steel, P., & Lee, K. (2007). A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of workplace sexual harassment. Personnel Psychology, 60(1), 127–162. doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00067.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, C. V., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (2009). Correlates of joining a sexual harassment class action. Law and Human Behavior, 33(4), 265–282. doi:10.1007/s10979-008-9156-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zabkowicz v. West Bend Co., 589 F. Supp. 780, 35 EPD 34,766. (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  • Zugelder, M. T., Champagne, P. J., & Maurer, S. D. (2006). An affirmative defense to sexual harassment by managers and supervisors: Analyzing employer liability and protecting employee rights in the United States. Employee Responsibilities and Rights, 18(2), 111–122. doi:10.1007/s10672-006-9008-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Camille Gallivan Nelson Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nelson, C.G., Carroll, K.A. (2012). Sexual Harassment: “Is It Just Me or Are You Hot?”. In: Reilly, N., Sirgy, M., Gorman, C. (eds) Work and Quality of Life. International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4059-4_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics