Abstract
With current digital technologies there are a number of networked computer-based tools that provide ways for users, be they learners or teachers, to collaborate in tackling visual representations of mathematics, both algebraic and geometric. For learners, there are various ways of collaborating that can occur while the learners are tackling mathematical problems. In this chapter we use selected outcomes from recent innovative research on this aspect of learning and teaching mathematics with digital technologies to review the patterns of collaboration that can occur in terms of teacher and learner experience. Given that such patterns of collaboration are via current digital technologies, this chapter goes on to offer a view on the likely impact on the cyberlearning of mathematics of progress towards the next generation of Web technologies that seeks to make use of ideas related to the web of data and the semantic web. Such impact is likely to be in terms of enhancing the learning applications of digital technologies, improving ways of administrating the educational programmes that they support, and potentially enabling teachers to maintain involvement in technological development and use over the longer-term.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The MiGen project is funded by the ESRC/EPSRC Teaching and Learning Research Programme (Technology Enhanced Learning; Award no: RES-139-25-0381). For more details about the project, see http://www.migen.org
- 2.
The Metafora project is co-funded by the European Union under the Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) theme of the 7th Framework Programme for R&D (FP7). For more information, visit http://www.metafora-project.org
- 3.
- 4.
All names used for students are pseudonyms.
- 5.
Resource Description Framework http://www.w3.org/RDF/
References
Anderson, P. (2007, February). What is Web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. JISC Technology and Standards Watch. Available online at: http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf. Last Accessed 23 Aug 2011.
Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). The semantic web. Scientific American, 284(4), 34–43.
Biggs, J. B. (1985). The role of meta-learning in study process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 55, 185–212.
Bittencourt, I. I., Isotani, S., Costa, E., & Mizoguchi, R. (2008). Research directions on semantic web and education. Journal Scientia: Interdisciplinary Studies in Computer Science, 19(1), 59–66.
Bizer, C. (2009). The emerging web of linked data. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 24(5), 87–92.
Cobb, P., Boufi, A., McClain, K., & Whitenack, J. (1997). Reflective discourse and collective reflection. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(3), 258–277.
Cohen, E. G., & Lotan, R. A. (1995). Producing equal-status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 99–120.
Cuoco, A. E., Goldenberg, E. P., & Mark, J. (1996). Habits of mind: An organizing principle for mathematics curriculum. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 15(4), 375–402.
Devedzic, V. (2006). Semantic web and education. New York: Springer.
DiNucci, D. (1999). Fragmented future: Web development faces a process of mitosis, mutation, and natural selection. Print, 53(4), 32–35.
diSessa, A. A. (2000). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Dragon, T., McLaren, B. M., Mavrikis, M., & Geraniou, E. (2011). Scaffolding collaborative learning opportunities: Integrating microworld use and argumentation. In: A. Paramythis, L. Lau, S. Demetriadis, M. Tzagarakis, & S. Kleanthous (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Workshop on Adaptive Support for Team Collaboration (ASTC-2011), held in conjunction with the International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (UMAP2011) (pp. 27–35). CEUR Workshop Proceedings. http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-743/
EU Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency. (2011). Key data on learning and innovation through ICT at school in Europe 2011. Brussels, Belgium: EU Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency.
Geraniou, E., Mavrikis, M., Kahn, K., Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (2009). Developing a microworld to support mathematical generalisation. In Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 3, pp. 49–56), Thessalonik, Greece.
Geraniou, G., Mavrikis, M., Hoyles, C., & Noss, R. (2011). Students’ justification strategies on equivalence of quasi-algebraic expressions. In Proceedings of the 35th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 393--400), Ankara, Turkey.
Grosseck, G. (2009). To use or not to use web 2.0 in higher education? Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 478–482.
Gutierrez-Santos, S., Geraniou, E., Pearce-Lazard, D., & Poulovassilis, A. (2012). The design of teacher assistance tools in an exploratory learning environment for algebraic generalisation. IEEE Transactions in Learning Technologies. http://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/TLT.2012.19
Gutierrez-Santos, S., Mavrikis, M., & Magoulas, G. (2010). Layered development and evaluation for intelligent support in exploratory environments: The case of microworlds. In Proceedings of Intelligent Tutoring Systems Conference (ITS 2010) (Vol. 6094, pp. 105–114). Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer: Pittsburgh, USA.
Healy, L., & Kynigos, C. (2010). Charting the microworld territory over time: Design and construction in mathematics education. ZDM: The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 42(1), 63–76.
Hendler, J. (2009). Web 3.0 emerging. Computer, 42(1), 111–113.
Hoyles, C. (1993). Microworlds/schoolworlds: The transformation of an innovation. In C. Keitel, & K. Ruthven (Eds.), Learning from computers: Mathematics education and technology (pp. 1–17). NATO ASI Series. Series F, Computer and Systems Sciences (121). Berlin, Germany/New York: Springer.
Jones, K. (2011). The value of learning geometry with ICT: Lessons from innovative educational research. In A. Oldknow & C. Knights (Eds.), Mathematics education with digital technology (pp. 39–45). London: Continuum.
Laningham, S. (Ed.). (2006). Tim Berners-Lee. Podcast, developerWorks Interviews, 22nd August, IBM website. Available online at: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/podcast/dwi/cm-int082206txt.html. Last Accessed 23 Aug 2011.
Lavicza, Z., Hohenwarter, M., Jones, K., Lu, A., & Dawes, M. (2010). Establishing a professional development network around dynamic mathematics software in England. International Journal for Technology in Mathematics Education, 17(4), 177–182.
Law, N., Pelgrum, W. J., & Plomp, T. (Eds.). (2008). Pedagogy and ICT use in schools around the world: Findings from the IEA SITES 2006 Study. Hong Kong/Dordrecht, the Netherlands: CERC/Springer.
Leonard, J. (2001). How group composition influenced the achievement of sixth-grade mathematics students. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 3(2–3), 175–200.
Linchevski, L., & Kutscher, B. (1998). Tell me with whom you’re learning, and I’ll tell you how much you’ve learned: Mixed-ability versus same-ability grouping in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(5), 533–554.
Loll, F., Pinkwart, N., Scheuer, O., & McLaren, B. M. (2009). Towards a flexible intelligent tutoring system for argumentation. In I. Adeo, N. Chen, Kinshuk, D. Sampson, & L. Zaitseva (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2009) (pp. 647–648). Los Alamitos, CA.
Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., Spence, J. C., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B., & d’Apollonia, S. (1996). Within-class grouping: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 423–458.
Maddux, C. D., & Johnson, D. L. (2011a). Technology in education: The concept of cultural momentum. Computers in the Schools, 28(1), 1–4.
Maddux, C. D., & Johnson, D. L. (2011b). Future trends in information technology in education. Computers in the Schools, 28(2), 87–91.
Maudsley, D. B. (1979). A theory of meta-learning and principles of facilitation: An organismic perspective. University of Toronto, 1979 (40, 8, 4354-4355-A).
Mavrikis, M., Noss, R., Hoyles, C., & Geraniou, E. (2012). Sowing the seeds of algebraic generalisation: Designing epistemic affordances for an intelligent microworld. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00469.x.
McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. W. (2007). Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era. In ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore 2007. Available online at: http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/singapore07/procs/mcloughlin.pdf. Last Accessed 23 Aug 2011.
Noss, R., Poulovassilis, A., Geraniou, E., Gutierrez-Santos, S., Hoyles, C., Kahn, K., et al. (2012). The design of a system to support exploratory learning of algebraic generalisation. Computers and Education, 59(1), 63–81.
Papert, S. (1980). Computer-based microworlds as incubators for powerful ideas. In R. Taylor (Ed.), The computer in the school: Tutor, tool, tutee (pp. 203–210). New York: Teacher’s College Press.
Pearce-Lazard, D., Poulovassilis, A., & Geraniou, E. (2010). The design of teacher assistance tools in an exploratory learning environment for mathematics generalisation. In: Proceedings of the 5th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL) (Lecture notes in computer science, Vol. 6383, pp. 260–275). Barcelona, Spain: Springer.
Rollett, H., Lux, M., Strohmaler, M., Dosinger, G., & Tochtermann, K. (2007). The Web 2.0 way of learning with technologies. International Journal of Learning Technology, 3(1), 87--107.
Scheuer, O., McLaren, B. M., Loll, F., & Pinkwart, N. (2009). An analysis and feedback infrastructure for argumentation learning systems. In V. Dimitrova, R. Mizoguchi, B. du Boulay, & A. Graesser (Eds.), Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED-09) (pp. 629–631). IOS Press: Brighton, UK.
Schoenfeld, A. H. (1992). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense-making in mathematics. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook for research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 334–370). New York: Macmillan.
Shadbolt, N., O’Hara, K., Salvadores, M., & Alani, H. (2011). eGovernment. In J. Domingue, D. Fensel, & J. A. Hendler (Eds.), Handbook of semantic web technologies (pp. 839–900). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Shaffer, D. W. (2007). How computer games help children learn. New York: Palgrave.
Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition: Computer support for building collaborative knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Stahl, G., Zhou, N., Cakir, M. P., & Sarmiento-Klapper, J. W. (2011). Seeing what we mean: Co-experiencing a shared virtual world. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning (CSCL 2011) (pp. 534–541). Hong Kong, China.
Thompson, P. (1987). Mathematical microworlds and intelligent computer-assisted instruction. In Artificial intelligence and instruction: Applications and methods (pp. 83–109). Boston: Addison-Wesley Longman.
Tiropanis, T., Davis, H., Millard, D., & Weal, M. (2009a). Semantic technologies for learning and teaching in the Web 2.0 era: A survey. In WebSci'09: society on-line, Athens, Greece, 18–20 March 2009. Available online at: http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/18429/. Last Accessed 23 Aug 2011.
Tiropanis, T., Davis, H., Millard, D., & Weal, M. (2009b). Semantic technologies for learning and teaching in the Web 2.0 era. Intelligent Systems, IEEE, 24(6), 49–53.
Warren, E., & Cooper, T. (2008). The effect of different representations on Year 3 to 5 students’ ability to generalise. ZDM: The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 40(1), 23–37.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jones, K., Geraniou, E., Tiropanis, T. (2013). Patterns of Collaboration: Towards Learning Mathematics in the Era of the Semantic Web. In: Martinovic, D., Freiman, V., Karadag, Z. (eds) Visual Mathematics and Cyberlearning. Mathematics Education in the Digital Era, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2321-4_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2321-4_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2320-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2321-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)