Editors’ Introduction
A systems perspective allows us to question popular beliefs about what women need to do to develop as leaders, or common explanations for the limited number of women in top leadership positions. For instance, much of the literature on leadership argues that the most successful leaders are those who engage in networking, or those who develop binding relationships throughout an organization. Because women have fewer opportunities to network and fewer such organizations in which to participate, it is often concluded that the paucity of such opportunities explains why there are fewer women than men in leadership positions. Gremmen and Benschop question the conclusion that networks are always beneficial, and contend that some professional women’s networks are not enabling. The general conclusion to be drawn is that not all collaborative networks are successful, particularly those that revert to power struggles rather than collaboration. From a systemic perspective, the limited value of women’s networks can be explained by the fact that they operate amidst and in interaction with a variety of other networks and dynamics, which may undermine the role it plays in subtle ways.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Acker, J. (1992). Gendering organizational theory. In A.J. Mills and P. Tancred (eds.), Gendering Organizational Analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 248–260.
Ainsworth, S. and C. Hardy (2004). Critical discourse analysis and identity: Why bother? Critical Discourse Studies 1(2):225–259.
Alvesson, M. and Y.D. Billing (2000). Questioning the notion of feminine leadership: A critical perspective on the gender labelling of leadership. Gender, Work and Organization 7(3):144–157.
Alvesson, M. and Y.D. Billing (2009). Understanding Gender and Organizations, 2nd edn. London: Sage.
Benschop, Y. (2006). Of small steps and the longing for giant leaps. Research on the intersection of sex and gender within workplaces and organizations. In A.M. Konrad, P. Prasad and J.K. Pringle (eds.), Handbook of Workplace Diversity. London/Thousand Oaks, CA/New Delhi: Sage, pp. 273–298.
Benschop, Y. (2009). The micro-politics of gendering in networking. Gender, Work and Organization 16(2):217–237.
Bierema, L. (2005). Women’s networks: A career development intervention or impediment? Human Resource Development International 8(2):207–224.
Blackmore, J. (2006). Deconstructing diversity discourses in the field of educational management and leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 34(2):181–199.
Brass, D.J. (1985). Men’s and women’s networks – A study of interaction patterns and influence in an organization. Academy of Management Journal 28(2):327–343.
Broadbridge, A. and J. Hearn (2008). Gender and management: New directions in research and continuing patterns in practice. British Journal of Management 19:S38–S49.
Burt, R.S. (1998). The gender of social capital. Rationality and Society 10(1):5–46.
Calás, M. and L. Smircich (2003). From the ‘woman’s point of view’ ten years later: Towards a feminist organization studies. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T.B. Lawrence and W.R. Nord (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organization Studies, 2nd edn. London: Sage, pp. 284–346.
Catalyst (1999). Creating Women’s Networks. New York, NY: Catalyst.
Cialdini, R., R. Borden, A. Thorne, M.R. Walker, S. Freeman and L.R. Sloon (1976). Basking in reflected glory: Three (football) field studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 34(3):366–375.
Creed, W.E.D., M.A. Scully and J.R. Austin (2002). Clothes make the person? The tailoring of legitimating accounts and the social construction of identity. Organization Science 13(5):475–496.
Cross, C. and C. Armstrong (2008). Understanding the role of networks in collective learning processes: The experiences of women. Advances in Developing Human Resources 10(4):1–14.
Czarniawska, B. (1998). A Narrative Approach in Organization Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ely, R. and I. Padavic (2007). A feminist analysis of organizational research on sex differences. Academy of Management Review 32(4):1121–1143.
Ely, R. and D. Meyerson (2000). Advancing gender equity in organizations: The challenge and importance of maintaining a gender narrative. Organization 7(4):589–608.
Fairclough, N. and R. Wodak (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T.A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction, vol. 2. London: Sage, pp. 258–284.
Flap, H. and B. Völker (2004). Creation and Returns of Social Capital. London: Routledge.
Fletcher, J.K. (1998). Disappearing Acts. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Forret, M.L. and T.W. Dougherty (2001). Correlates of networking behavior for managerial and professional employees. Group & Organization Management 26(3):283–311.
Forret, M.L. and T.W. Dougherty (2004). Networking behaviors and career outcomes: differences for men and women? Journal of Organizational Behavior 25(3):419–437.
Fraser, N. (2009, March–April). Feminism, capitalism and the cunning of history. New Left Review 56:97–117.
Ibarra (1992). Homophily and differential returns: Sex differences in network structure and access in an advertising firm. Administrative Science Quarterly 37(3):422–447.
Ibarra, H. (1993). Personal Networks of Women and Minorities in Management – a Conceptual-Framework. Academy of Management Review 18(1):56–87.
Ibarra, H. (1997). Paving an alternative route: Gender differences in managerial networks. Social Psychology Quarterly 60(1):91–102.
Ibarra, H., M. Kilduff and W. Tsai (2005). Zooming in and out: Connecting individuals and collectivities at the frontiers of organizational network research. Organization Science 16(4):359–371.
Kanter, R.M. (1977). Men and Women of the Corporation. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Kilduff, M., W. Tsai and R. Hanke (2006). A paradigm too far? A dynamic stability reconsideration of the social network research program. Academy of Management Review 31(4):1031–1048.
Kimmel, M. (2004). The Gendered Society, 2nd edn. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Krackhardt, D. (1990). Assessing the political landscape – structure, cognition and power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(2):342–369.
Lorber, J. (2005). Gender Inequality. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury.
Mavin, S. and P. Bryans (2002). Academic women in the UK: Mainstreaming our experiences and networking for action. Gender & Education 14(3):235–250.
McGuire, G.M. (2002). Gender, race, and the shadow structure – A study of informal networks and inequality in a work organization. Gender & Society 16(3):303–322.
Meyerson, D. (2003). Tempered radicals: How everyday leaders inspire change at work: Harvard Business School Press.
Meyerson, D. (2001). Tempered Radicals. How People Use Difference to Inspire Change at Work. Boston, MA: Harvard School Press.
Meyerson, D. and M. Scully (1995). Tempered radicalism and the politics of ambivalence and change. Organization Science 6(5):585–600.
Meyerson, D. and M. Scully (2003). Tempered radicalism: Changing the workplace from within. In R.J. Ely, E.G. Foldy, M.A. Scully(eds.); the Center for Gender in Organizations, Simmons School of Management, Simmons College, Reader in Gender, Work and Organization. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 266–272.
Meyerson, D. and M. Tompkins (2007). Tempered radicals as institutional change agents. The case of advancing gender equity at the University of Michigan. Harvard Journal of Law and Gender 30(2):303–322.
Parkhe, A., S. Wasserman and D. Ralston (2006). New frontiers in network theory development. Academy of Management Review 31(3):560–568.
Phillips, N. and C. Hardy (1997). Managing multiple identities: Discourses, legitimacy and resources in the UK refugee system. Organization 4(2):159–185.
Pini, B., K., Brown and C. Ryan (2004). Women-only networks as a strategy for change? A case study from local government. Women in Management Review 19(6):286–292.
Platform for Professional Women Networks (PfPWN) (2007). Guide for the Platform for Professional Women Networks. Amsterdam: PfPWN.
Podolny, J.M. and J.N. Baron (1997). Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American Sociological Review 62(5):673–693.
Scott, J.W. (1988). Deconstructing equality-versus-difference: Or, the uses of poststructuralist theory for feminism. Feminist Studies 14(1):33–50.
Scott, D.B. (1996). Shattering the instrumental-expressive myth: The power of women’s networks in corporate government affairs. Gender and Society 10(3):232–247.
Singh, V., S. Vinnicombe and S. Kumra (2006). Women in formal corporate networks: An organizational citizenship perspective. Women in Management Review 21(6):458–482.
Sools, A., M. Van Engen and C. Baerveldt (2007). Gendered career-making practices: On ‘doing ambition’ or how managers discursively position themselves in a multinational corporation. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 80:413–435.
Van den Brink, M. (2009). Behind the Scenes of Science. Gender Practices in the Recruitment and Selection of Professors in the Netherlands. Nijmegen: Radboud University Nijmegen (dissertation).
Van Emmerik, I.I.H. (2006). Gender differences in the creation of different types of social capital: A multilevel study. Social Networks 28(1):24–37.
Vinnicombe, S., V. Singh and S. Kumra (2003). Making Good Connections: Best Practice for Women’s Corporate Networks. London: Cranfield School of Management and Opportunity Now.
Zeijlstra, M. (2006) Ik ben niet anti-man. Delta 38(30), June 15th. (‘I am not anti-male’; Interview with the first leader of the Delft University of Technology professional women’s network)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gremmen, I., Benschop, Y. (2011). Negotiating Ambivalence: The Leadership of Professional Women’s Networks. In: Werhane, P., Painter-Morland, M. (eds) Leadership, Gender, and Organization. Issues in Business Ethics, vol 27. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9014-0_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9014-0_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9013-3
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9014-0
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)