Skip to main content

Learning Actions Models: Qualitative Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Logic, Rationality, and Interaction (LORI 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9394))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In dynamic epistemic logic, actions are described using action models. In this paper we introduce a framework for studying learnability of action models from observations. We present first results concerning propositional action models. First we check two basic learnability criteria: finite identifiability (conclusively inferring the appropriate action model in finite time) and identifiability in the limit (inconclusive convergence to the right action model). We show that deterministic actions are finitely identifiable, while non-deterministic actions require more learning power—they are identifiable in the limit. We then move on to a particular learning method, which proceeds via restriction of a space of events within a learning-specific action model. This way of learning closely resembles the well-known update method from dynamic epistemic logic. We introduce several different learning methods suited for finite identifiability of particular types of deterministic actions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Andersen, M.B., Bolander, T., Jensen, M.H.: Conditional epistemic planning. In: del Cerro, L.F., Herzig, A., Mengin, J. (eds.) JELIA 2012. LNCS, vol. 7519, pp. 94–106. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Angluin, D.: Inductive inference of formal languages from positive data. Information and Control 45(2), 117–135 (1980)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Baltag, A., Gierasimczuk, N., Smets, S.: Belief revision as a truth-tracking process. In: Apt, K. (ed.) TARK 2011: Proceedings of the 13th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, pp. 187–190. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baltag, A., Gierasimczuk, N., Smets, S.: Truth tracking by belief revision. ILLC Prepublication Series PP-2014-20 (to appear in Studia Logica 2015) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baltag, A., Gierasimczuk, N., Smets, S.: On the solvability of inductive problems: A study in epistemic topology. ILLC Prepublication Series PP-2015-13 (to appear in Proceedings of TARK 2015) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Baltag, A., Moss, L.S., Solecki, S.: The logic of public announcements and common knowledge and private suspicions. In: Gilboa, I. (ed.) TARK 1998: Proceedings of the 7th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, pp. 43–56. Morgan Kaufmann (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bolander, T., Andersen, M.B.: Epistemic planning for single- and multi-agent systems. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 21, 9–34 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. van Ditmarsch, H., Kooi, B.: Semantic results for ontic and epistemic change. In: Bonanno, G., van der Hoek, W., Wooldridge, M. (eds.) LOFT 7: Logic and the Foundation of Game and Decision Theory. Texts in Logic and Games, vol. 3, pp. 87–117. Amsterdam University Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ghallab, M., Nau, D.S., Traverso, P.: Automated Planning: Theory and Practice. Morgan Kaufmann (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gierasimczuk, N.: Learning by erasing in dynamic epistemic logic. In: Dediu, A.H., Ionescu, A.M., Martín-Vide, C. (eds.) LATA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5457, pp. 362–373. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Gierasimczuk, N.: Knowing One’s Limits. Logical Analysis of Inductive Inference. Ph.D. thesis, Universiteit van Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gierasimczuk, N., de Jongh, D., Hendricks, V.F.: Logic and learning. In: Baltag, A., Smets, S. (eds.) Johan van Benthem on Logical and Informational Dynamics. Springer (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gierasimczuk, N., de Jongh, D.: On the complexity of conclusive update. The Computer Journal 56(3), 365–377 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lange, S., Zeugmann, T.: Types of monotonic language learning and their characterization. In: COLT 1992: Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Conference on Computational Learning Theory, pp. 377–390. ACM (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mukouchi, Y.: Characterization of finite identification. In: Jantke, K.P. (ed.) AII 1992. LNCS, vol. 642, pp. 260–267. Springer, Heidelberg (1992)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Sadzik, T.: Exploring the Iterated Update Universe, ILLC Prepublications PP-2006-26 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sietsma, F., van Eijck, J.: Action emulation between canonical models. Journal of Philosophical Logic 42(6), 905–925 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Walsh, T.J., Littman, M.L.: Efficient learning of action schemas and web-service descriptions. In: AAAI 2008: Proceedings of the 23rd National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 2, pp. 714–719. AAAI Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Bolander .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bolander, T., Gierasimczuk, N. (2015). Learning Actions Models: Qualitative Approach. In: van der Hoek, W., Holliday, W., Wang, Wf. (eds) Logic, Rationality, and Interaction. LORI 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9394. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48561-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48561-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-48560-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-48561-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics