Skip to main content

Revenue Maximization for Selling Multiple Correlated Items

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9294))

Abstract

We study the problem of selling n items to a single buyer with an additive valuation function. We consider the valuation of the items to be correlated, i.e., desirabilities of the buyer for the items are not drawn independently. Ideally, the goal is to design a mechanism to maximize the revenue. However, it has been shown that a revenue optimal mechanism might be very complicated and as a result inapplicable to real-world auctions. Therefore, our focus is on designing a simple mechanism that achieves a constant fraction of the optimal revenue. Babaioff et al. [3] propose a simple mechanism that achieves a constant fraction of the optimal revenue for independent setting with a single additive buyer. However, they leave the following problem as an open question: “Is there a simple, approximately optimal mechanism for a single additive buyer whose value for n items is sampled from a common base-value distribution?” Babaioff et al. show a constant approximation factor of the optimal revenue can be achieved by either selling the items separately or as a whole bundle in the independent setting. We show a similar result for the correlated setting when the desirabilities of the buyer are drawn from a common base-value distribution. It is worth mentioning that the core decomposition lemma which is mainly the heart of the proofs for efficiency of the mechanisms does not hold for correlated settings. Therefore we propose a modified version of this lemma which is applicable to the correlated settings as well. Although we apply this technique to show the proposed mechanism can guarantee a constant fraction of the optimal revenue in a very weak correlation, this method alone can not directly show the efficiency of the mechanism in stronger correlations. Therefore, via a combinatorial approach we reduce the problem to an auction with a weak correlation to which the core decomposition technique is applicable. In addition, we introduce a generalized model of correlation for items and show the proposed mechanism achieves an O(logk) approximation factor of the optimal revenue in that setting.

Supported in part by NSF CAREER award 1053605, NSF grant CCF-1161626, ONR YIP award N000141110662, and a DARPA/AFOSR grant FA9550-12-1-0423.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alaei, S., Fu, H., Haghpanah, N., Hartline, J., Malekian, A.: Bayesian optimal auctions via multi-to single-agent reduction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1203.5099 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alaei, S., Fu, H., Haghpanah, N., Hartline, J.: The simple economics of approximately optimal auctions. In: 2013 IEEE 54th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pp. 628–637. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Babaioff, M., Immorlica, N., Lucier, B., Matthew Weinberg, S.: A simple and approximately optimal mechanism for an additive buyer. arXiv preprint arXiv:1405.6146 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bhalgat, A., Gollapudi, S., Munagala, K.: Optimal auctions via the multiplicative weight method. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 73–90. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bhattacharya, S., Goel, G., Gollapudi, S., Munagala, K.: Budget constrained auctions with heterogeneous items. In: Proceedings of the Forty-Second ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 379–388. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Briest, P., Chawla, S., Kleinberg, R., Matthew Weinberg, S.: Pricing randomized allocations. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-First Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 585–597. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cai, Y., Daskalakis, C., Matthew Weinberg, S.: An algorithmic characterization of multi-dimensional mechanisms. In: Proceedings of the Forty-Fourth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 459–478. ACM (2012a)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cai, Y., Daskalakis, C., Weinberg, M.: Optimal multi-dimensional mechanism design: Reducing revenue to welfare maximization. In: 2012 IEEE 53rd Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pp. 130–139. IEEE (2012b)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cai, Y.: Constantinos Daskalakis, and S Matthew Weinberg. Reducing revenue to welfare maximization: Approximation algorithms and other generalizations. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 578–595. SIAM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chawla, S., Hartline, J.D., Malec, D.L., Sivan, B.: Multi-parameter mechanism design and sequential posted pricing. In: Proceedings of the Forty-Second ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 311–320. ACM (2010a)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chawla, S., Malec, D.L., Sivan, B.: The power of randomness in bayesian optimal mechanism design. In: Proceedings of the 11th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 149–158. ACM (2010b)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Daskalakis, C., Deckelbaum, A., Tzamos, C.: The complexity of optimal mechanism design. In: SODA, pp. 1302–1318. SIAM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hart, S., Nisan, N.: Approximate revenue maximization with multiple items. arXiv preprint arXiv:1204.1846 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hart, S., Nisan, N.: The menu-size complexity of auctions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1304.6116 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hart, S., Reny, P.J.: Maximal revenue with multiple goods: Nonmonotonicity and other observations. Center for the Study of Rationality (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kleinberg, R., Weinberg, S.M.: Matroid prophet inequalities. In: Proceedings of the Forty-Fourth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 123–136. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Li, X., Yao, A.C.-C.: On revenue maximization for selling multiple independently distributed items. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110(28), 11232–11237 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Maskin, E., Riley, J., Hahn, F.: Optimal multi-unit auctions. The Economics of Missing Markets, Information, and Games (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Myerson, R.B.: Optimal auction design. Mathematics of Operations Research 6(1), 58–73 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Pavlov, G.: Optimal mechanism for selling two goods. The BE Journal of Theoretical Economics 11(1) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rubinstein, A., Matthew Weinberg, S.: Simple mechanisms for a combinatorial buyer and applications to revenue monotonicity. arXiv preprint arXiv:1501.07637 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yao, A.C.-C.: An n-to-1 bidder reduction for multi-item auctions and its applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.3278 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bateni, M., Dehghani, S., Hajiaghayi, M., Seddighin, S. (2015). Revenue Maximization for Selling Multiple Correlated Items. In: Bansal, N., Finocchi, I. (eds) Algorithms - ESA 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9294. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48350-3_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48350-3_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-48349-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-48350-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics