Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

“Data”: The data

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Information Cultures in the Digital Age

Abstract

While many scholars in information science have understandably focused on the concept of “information” as foundational, some authors have identified other concepts as having similarly foundational status. Two that are regularly suggested as candidates are “data” and “document.” Oddly, perhaps, for such a basic term, “data” has not been as frequently subject to probing analysis in the scholarly literature as “information”; and although “document” has long been a term of special interest to historians of the European documentation movement, some of whom continue to develop a document theory, there is little consensus on the precise nature of the conceptual relationship between “data” and “document.” In this paper, a review is conducted of historical interpretations of “data,” and relationships with contemporary conceptions of “document” are explored. The conclusion is reached that, current practice notwithstanding, it is not in fact the case that documents are made up of data, nor that the document is a species of dataset: rather it is the other way round, in both respects. A dataset is made up of documents; and the dataset is a species of document.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1989). From data to wisdom. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis, 16, 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, N. (1721). An universal etymological English dictionary. London, England: Printed for E. Bell et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balbus, J. (1971). Catholicon. Farnborough, England: Gregg. [Facsimile reprint of the 1st printed ed. (1460) of the thirteenth-century text, printed in Mainz. See http://lcweb2.loc.gov/service/rbc/rbc0001/2012/2012rosen0031/2012rosen0031.pdf for a digitized copy.]

  • *Batten, Sir W. (1630). A most plaine and easie way for the finding of the sunnes amplitude and azimuth, and thereby the variation of the compasse, by logarithme. N.p.: E. Allde for J. Tapp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgman, C. L. (2007). Scholarship in the digital age: Information, infrastructure, and the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgman, C. L. (2014). Big data, little data, no data: Scholarship in the networked world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Boughen, E. (1650). Master Geree’s Case of Conscience Sifted. London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland, M. K. (1991). Information as thing. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 351–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland, M. K. (1997). What is a “document”? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 48(9), 804–809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capurro, R., & Hjørland, B. (2003). The concept of information. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 343–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • †‡Chambers, E. (1728). Cyclopædia: or, An universal dictionary of arts and sciences. London, England: Printed for J. & J. Knapton et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1999). Systems thinking. In W. Currie & B. Galliers (Eds.), Rethinking management information systems: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 45–56). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, J. H., Renear, A. H., & DeRose, S. J. (1987). Markup systems and the future of scholarly text processing. Communications of the ACM, 30(11), 933–947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Day, R. E. (2001). The modern invention of information: Discourse, history, and power. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeRose, S. J., Durand, D. G., Mylonas, E., & Renear, A.H. (1990). What is text, really? Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 1(2), 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Donne, J. (1649). Fifty sermons. London, England: Printed by J. Flesher for M. F. et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drucker, J. (2011). Humanities approaches to graphical display. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 5(1). http://www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/5/1/000091/000091.html

  • Eliot, T. S. (1934). The rock. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • ¶Encyclopædia Britannica: or, A dictionary of arts and sciences, compiled upon a new plan. (1771). Edinburgh: Printed for A. Bell and C. Macfarquhar.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Euclid. (1661). Euclid’s Elements of geometry: … Likewise Euclid’s Data. J. Leeke & G. Serle (Eds.). London, England: Printed by R. & W. Leybourn for R. Tomlins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraris, M. (2013). Documentality: Why it is necessary to leave traces. Bronx, NY: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, L. (2008). Data. In W. A. Darity, Jr. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (2nd ed., vol. 2, pp. 234–237). Detroit, MI: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frické, M. (2009). The knowledge pyramid: A critique of the DIKW hierarchy. Journal of Information Science, 35(2), 131–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frohmann, B. (2004). Deflating information: From science studies to documentation. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furner, J. (2004). Information studies without information. Library Trends, 52(3), 427–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furner, J. (2014). Information without information studies. In F. Ibekwe-SanJuan and T. M. Dousa (Eds.), Theories of information, communication and knowledge (pp. 143–179). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science+Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitelman, L. (Ed.). (2013). “Raw data” is an oxymoron. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gitelman, L. (2014). Paper knowledge: Toward a media history of documents. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glare, P. G. W. (Ed.). (2012). Oxford Latin dictionary (2nd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Hammond, H. (1647). A copy of some papers past at Oxford, betwixt the author of the Practicall catechisme, and Mr. Ch. London, England: Printed by R. Cotes for R. Royston.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Hammond, H. (1648). A brief vindication of three passages in the Practical catechisme. London, England: Printed for R. Royston.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‡Harris, J. (1704). Lexicon technicum: or, An universal English dictionary of arts and sciences. London, England: Printed for D. Brown et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmholtz, H. von. (1977). Epistemological writings: The Paul Hertz / Moritz Schlick centenary edition of 1921. R. S. Cohen & Y. Elkana (Eds.). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hortus vocabulorum, 1500. (1968). R. C. Alston (Ed.). Menston, England: Scolar. [Facsimile reprint of the 1st ed. (1500) printed by W. de Worde, London.]

    Google Scholar 

  • ∫Huntsman, J. F. (1973). “Pepys MS 2002’ Medulla grammatice: An edition.” PhD diss. ProQuest (7326020).

    Google Scholar 

  • IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. (1998). Functional requirements for bibliographic records: Final report. Munich, Germany: K. G. Saur.

    Google Scholar 

  • †‡Johnson, S. (1755). A dictionary of the English language. London, England: Printed by W. Strahan, for J. & P. Knapton et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent, W. (1978). Data and reality: Basic assumptions in data processing reconsidered. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latham, R. E. (1986). Dictionary of medieval Latin from British sources (vol. 1: A–L, fasc. 3). London, England: British Academy / Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lund, N. W. (2009). Document theory. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 43, 1–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markham, A. N. (2013). Undermining “data”: A critical examination of a core term in scientific inquiry. First Monday, 18(10). http://firstmonday.org/article/view/4868/3749

  • †Martin, B. (1749). Lingua Britannica reformata: or, A new English dictionary. London, England: Printed for J. Hodges et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michell, J. (1986). Measurement scales and statistics: A clash of paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 100(3), 398–407.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Moxon, J. (1679). Mathematicks made easie: or, A mathematical dictionary. London, England: Printed for J. Moxon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman, E. B. (1974). On the origin of “scales of measurement.” In H. R. Moskowitz, B. Scharf, & J. C. Stevens (Eds.), Sensation and measurement (pp. 137–145). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • †Ogilvie, J. (1882). The imperial dictionary of the English language: A complete encyclopedic lexicon, literary, scientific, and technological (new ed.). C. Annandale (Ed.). London, England: Blackie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renear, A. H. (2004). Text encoding. In S. Schreibman, R. Siemens, & J. Unsworth (Eds.), A companion to digital humanities (pp. 218–239). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renear, A. H., Sacchi, S., & Wickett, K. M. (2010). Definitions of dataset in the scientific and technical literature. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/meet.14504701240/full

  • Renear, A. H., Mylonas, E., & Durand, D. G. (1996). Refining our notion of what text really is: The problem of overlapping hierarchies. In S. Hockey & N. Ide (Eds.), Research in humanities computing 4: Selected papers from the ALLC/ACH Conference, Christ Church, Oxford, April 1992 (pp. 263–280). Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renear, A. H., & Wickett, K. M. (2010). There are no documents. In Proceedings of Balisage: The Markup Conference 2010. http://www.balisage.net/Proceedings/vol5/print/Renear01/BalisageVol5-Renear01.html

  • Riles, A. (Ed.). (2006). Documents: Artifacts of modern knowledge. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, D. (2013). Data before the fact. In L. Gitelman (Ed.), “Raw data” is an oxymoron (pp. 15–40). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, J. (2007). The wisdom hierarchy: Representations of the DIKW hierarchy. Journal of Information Science, 33(2), 163–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, B. (1903). The principles of mathematics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacchi, S., Wickett, K. M., Renear, A. H., & Dubin, D. (2011). A framework for applying the concept of significant properties to datasets. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 48. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/meet.2011.14504801148/full

  • Simpson, J. (Ed.). (2000–). Oxford English dictionary (3rd ed.). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com/

  • Simsion, G. C. (2007). Data modeling: Theory and practice. Denville, NJ: Technics Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. (2014). Document acts. In A. Konzelmann Ziv & H. B. Schmid (Eds.), Institutions, emotions, and group agents: Contributions to social ontology (pp. 19–31). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer Science+Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. S. (1946). On the theory of scales of measurement. Science, 103(2684), 677–680.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, T. (1972). Dictionarium linguae Latinae et Anglicanae, 1587. R. C. Alston (Ed.). Menston, England: Scolar. [Facsimile reprint of the 1st ed. (1587) published by the author in Cambridge.]

    Google Scholar 

  • Thow-Yick, L. (1994). The basic entity model: A fundamental theoretical model of information and information processing. Information Processing & Management, 30(5), 647–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • ∫Tremblay, F. A. (1968). “The Latin–Middle English glossary ‘Medulla grammatice,’ B. M. Harl. MS 1738.” PhD diss., Catholic University of America. ProQuest (6912308).

    Google Scholar 

  • *Tuke, T. (1614). Nevv essayes: meditations, and vowes. London, England: Printed by N. Okes.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Urquhart, T. (1645). The trissotetras: or, A most exquisite table for resolving all manner of triangles. London, England: Printed by I. Young.

    Google Scholar 

  • ∫Van Zandt-McCleary, J. M. (1958). “The Medulla grammatice Latin–English dictionary: A diplomatic transcription.” PhD diss., University of Chicago. ProQuest (T-04429).

    Google Scholar 

  • †Webster, N. (1828). An American dictionary of the English language. New York, NY: S. Converse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickett, K. M., Sacchi, S., Dubin, D., & Renear, A. H. (2012). Identifying content and levels of representation in scientific data. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 49. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/meet.14504901199/full

  • †Worcester, J. E. (1860). A dictionary of the English language. Boston, MA: Swan, Brewer & Tileston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeleny, M. (1987). Management support systems: Towards integrated knowledge management. Human Systems Management, 7(1), 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

Electronic versions of some of the works listed may be found according to the following key:

¶Eighteenth Century Collections Online.

†HathiTrust Digital Library.

‡The Making of the Modern World.

∫ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Los Angeles, California, USA

    Prof. Jonathan Furner

Authors
  1. Prof. Jonathan Furner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Furner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Hobart, Australia

    Matthew Kelly

  2. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

    Jared Bielby

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Furner, J. (2016). “Data”: The data. In: Kelly, M., Bielby, J. (eds) Information Cultures in the Digital Age. Springer VS, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-14681-8_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation