Clinicopathologic Characteristics of Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorders
- Cite this paper as:
- Nalesnik M.A. (2002) Clinicopathologic Characteristics of Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorders. In: Oertel S.H., Riess H. (eds) Immunosurveillance, Immunodeficiencies and Lymphoproliferations. Recent Results in Cancer Research, vol 159. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) is a syndrome of uncontrolled lymphoid growth in the immunosuppressed transplant patient. Known risk factors include Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) seronegativity at the time of transplant, pediatric age and allograft type. Newer studies suggest that constitutional factors such as cytokine gene polymorphisms may also predispose to PTLD. Although PTLD may occur at any time, the majority of cases arise within the first two post-transplant years. Clinical presentation is heterogeneous and dependent upon the location and extent of disease. Allograft involvement is common, particularly in cases of lung, intestine, or pancreas transplantation. Most PTLD are of B lymphocyte origin. A histopathologic classification system has been proposed and it is important to understand the histology of these lesions, since the term PTLD incorporates both hyperplastic and neoplastic growths. Histologic subclassification also has prognostic value, although this remains imperfect at present. Clinical evaluation should include staging as for lymphomas, since PTLD stage is an important determinant of outcome. In EBV-associated PTLD, quantitative evaluation of EB viral genomic load has a role in guiding prophylaxis, diagnosis, and monitoring of therapy. The presence of EBV is not an absolute requirement for the diagnosis of PTLD, and it has been suggested that there has been a recent increase in the number of EBV-negative cases. Such lesions have a median onset time around 50–60 months post-transplant. Therapy of PTLD must be tailored to the individual patient. Newer modalities such as anti-CD20 antibodies are being evaluated and may complement the standard stepwise approach that begins with a reduction of immunosuppression. The role of chemotherapy continues to be defined, and in some cases early recourse to this approach may be desirable. Survival varies by age and extent of disease, with pediatric patients and those with localized disease tending to fare better. A finer understanding of the molecular cellular and virologie underpinnings of PTLD remains essential in order to define optimal treatment regimens. The emergence of EBV-negative PTLD is a problem and the relationship of this to standard lymphomas arising in nonimmunosuppressed patients remains to be defined. Continued individual and multi-institutional studies are essential for progress in these areas.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.