Skip to main content

Heterogeneous Testbeds, Tools and Experiments –Measurement Requirements Perspective

  • Conference paper
Book cover Measurement Methodology and Tools

Abstract

Federated testbeds for future Internet experimentation have been deployed worldwide to enable large scale and diverse experiments with future Internet technologies ranging from components to complete systems. They serve the purpose of validating new solutions to identified problems and to compare them with current or other evolving solutions. The proliferation of management frameworks and in particular of measurement and monitoring tools poses often a great challenge for the experimenter. OpenLab is addressing the interoperability of testbeds at several levels. In this article we describe how the OpenLab testbeds cope with divergent measurement and monitoring requirements originating from four identified experiments that each of them has its own original research objectives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. OpenLab, http://www.ict-openlab.eu

  2. PlanetLab Europe, http://www.planet-lab.eu/

  3. NITOS wireless testbed, http://nitlab.inf.uth.gr/NITlab/index.php/testbed

  4. w-iLab.t wireless testbed, http://www.ibbt.be/en/ilabs/ilab-t/wireless-lab

  5. European Traffic Observatory Measurement InfrastruCture (ETOMIC), http://etomic.org

  6. HEN emulation testbed, http://mediatools.cs.ucl.ac.uk/nets/hen

  7. OpenFlow, http://www.openflow.org/

  8. Gavras, A., Karila, A., Fdida, S., May, M., Potts, M.: Future Internet Research and Experimentation. ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review 37(3), 89 (2007), http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=1273445.1273460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gavras, A. (ed.): Experimentally driven research, white paper, On the existence of experimentally-driven research methodology, Version 1 (April 2010), http://www.ict-fireworks.eu/fileadmin/documents/Experimentally_driven_research_V1.pdf (downloaded July 2012)

  10. IPLAYER, BBC iPlayer TV Home, http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/

  11. HULU, Watch TV. Watch Movies, http://www.hulu.com

  12. NETFLIX, Watch TV Shows Online, Watch Movies Online, http://www.netflix.com

  13. Torres, R., Finamore, A., Kim, J.R., Mellia, M., Munafò, M.M., Rao, S.: Dissecting Video Server Selection Strategies in the YouTube CDN. In: The 31st International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS 2011), Minneapolis, MN, USA, June 20-24 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Adhikari, V.K., Jain, S., Chen, Y., Zhang, Z.-L.: Reverse Engineering the YouTube Video Delivery Cloud. In: IEEE HotMD 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Adhikari, V.K., Jain, S., Chen, Y., Zhang, Z.-L.: Where Do You “Tube”? Uncovering YouTube Server Selection Strategy. In: IEEE ICCCN 2011 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Huang, C., Wang, A., Li, J., Ross, K.W.: Measuring and Evaluating Large-Scale CDNs. In: IMC 2008, Vouliagmeni, Greece, October 20-22 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pathan, A.-M.K., Buyya, R., Vakali, A.: Content Delivery Networks: State of the Art, Insights, and Imperatives. In: Content Delivery Networks. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol. 9(1), pp. 3–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2008), doi:10.1007/978-3-540-77887-5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Broberg, J., Buyya, R., Tari, Z.: MetaCDN: Harnessing ‘Storage Clouds’ for high performance content delivery. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 32(5), 1012–1022 (2009), doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2009.03.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leivadeas, A., Pappagianni, C., Papavassiliou, S.: Efficient Resource Mapping Framework over Networked Clouds via Iterated Local Search based Request Partitioning. To Appear in IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems (2012) (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vassilaras, S., Yovanof, G.: Wireless Going in the Cloud: A Promising Concept or Just Marketing Hype? Special Issue: Distributed and Secure Cloud Clustering, Wireless Personal Communications 58(1), 5–16 (2010), doi:10.1007/s11277-011-0284-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Katsaros, D., Dimokas, N., Tassiulas, L.: Social network analysis concepts in the design of wireless ad hoc network protocols. IEEE Network 24(6), 23–29 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pappagianni, C., Leivadeas, A., Papavassiliou, S.: A Cloud-oriented Content Delivery Network Paradigm: Modelling and Assessment. Under Review, IEEE TDSC Special Issue on Cloud Computing Assessment: Metrics, Algorithms, Policies, Models, and Evaluation Techniques

    Google Scholar 

  23. Leivadeas, A., Pappagianni, C., Papavassiliou, S.: Socio-aware Virtual Network Embedding. To Appear in IEEE Network Magazine (2012) (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chen, F., Guo, K., Lin, J., La Porta, T.F.: Intra-cloud Lightning: Building CDNs in the Cloud. In: IEEE INFOCOM, pp. 433–441 (March 2012), doi:10.1109/INFCOM.2012.6195782

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sarma, A.C., Girao, J.: Identities in the future internet of things. Wireless Personal Communications 49(3), 353–363 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Papadimitriou, D., Zahariadis, T., Martinez-Julia, P., Papafili, I., Morreale, V., Torelli, F., Sales, B., Demeester, P.: Design principles for the future internet architecture. In: Álvarez, F., et al. (eds.) FIA 2012. LNCS, vol. 7281, pp. 55–67. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Future Internet Architecture Group, http://ec.europa.eu/information_society/activities/foi/events/fiarch-23052011/index_en.htm

  28. National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, “AKARI” Architecture Design Project for New Generation Network (2010), http://akari-project.nict.go.jp

  29. Martinez-Julia, P., Gomez-Skarmeta, A.F., Kafle, V.P., Inoue, M.: Secure and robust framework for id/locator mapping system. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems E95-D, 108–116 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Kafle, V.P., Inoue, M.: HIMALIS: Heterogeneity inclusion and mobility adaptation through locator id separation in new generation network. IEICE Transactions on Communications E93-B(3), 478–489 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Kafle, V.P., Otsuki, H., Inoue, M.: An id/locator split architecture for future networks. IEEE Communications Magazine 48(2), 138–144 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gomez-Skarmeta, A.F., Martinez-Julia, P., Girao, J., Sarma, A.: Identity based architecture for secure communication in future internet. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM Workshop on Digital Identity Management, pp. 45–48. ACM, New York (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Martinez-Julia, P., Gomez-Skarmeta, A.F., Girao, J., Sarma, A.: Protecting digital identities in future networks. In: Proceedings of the Future Network and Mobile Summit 2011. International Information Management Corporation, pp. 1–8 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Huston, G.: BGP reports (July 2007), http://bgp.potaroo.net/

  35. Meyer, D., Zhang, L., Fall, K.: Report from the IAB workshop on routing and addressing. RFC 4984 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Csernai, M., Gulyás, A., Rétvári, G., Heszberger, Z., Császár, A.: The skeleton of the Internet. In: Proceedings of GLOBECOM 2010 Conference, Miami, Florida, December 6-10, vol. 2, pp. 1208–1212 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Gulyás, A., Kőrösi, A., Rétvári, G., Bíró, J., Szabó, D.: Network Formation Games Can Give Rise to Realistic Networks. In: Proceedings of ACM PODC, Funchal, Portugal, July 15-18 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Németh, F., Stipkovits, Á., Sonkoly, B., Gulyás, A.: Towards SmartFlow: Case Studies on Enhanced Programmable Forwarding in OpenFlow Switches. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM Demo, Helsinki, Finland, August 13-17 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lacage, M., Ferrari, M., Hansen, M., Turletti, T., Dabbous, W.: NEPI: using independent simulators, emulators, and testbeds for easy experimentation. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review 43(4), 60–65 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Triukose, S., Wen, Z., Rabinovich, M.: Measuring a Commercial Content Delivery Network. In: WWW 2011 Proc. of the 20th International Conference on World Wide Web (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Leighton, T.: Given the Internet’s bottlenecks, how can we build fast, scalable, content-delivery systems. Communications of the ACM 52(2) (2009), http://www.akamai.com/dl/technical_publications/leighton_byline_09.pdf

  42. Wong, B., Slivkins, A., Sirer, E.G.: Meridian, A Lightweight Network Location Service without Virtual Coordinates. In: SIGCOMM 2005, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA, August 21-26 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wong, B., Stoyanov, I., Sirer, E.G.: Octant: A Comprehensive Framework for the Geolocalization of Internet Hosts. In: Symposium on Networked System Design and Implementation, NSDI (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Martinez-Julia, P., Jara, A.J., Skarmeta, A.F.: GAIA Extended Research Infrastructure: Sensing, Connecting, and Processing the Real World. In: Korakis, T., Zink, M., Ott, M. (eds.) TridentCom 2012. LNICST, vol. 44, pp. 3–4. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  45. OMF (cOntrol and Management Framework) (2012), http://omf.mytestbed.net

  46. Quereilhac, A., Lacage, M., Freire, C., Turletti, T., Dabbous, W.: NEPI: An Integration Framework for Ntwork Experimentation. In: Softcom (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gavras, A. et al. (2013). Heterogeneous Testbeds, Tools and Experiments –Measurement Requirements Perspective. In: Fàbrega, L., Vilà, P., Careglio, D., Papadimitriou, D. (eds) Measurement Methodology and Tools. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7586. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41296-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41296-7_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41295-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41296-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics