Skip to main content

Categorization of Modeling Language Concepts: Graded or Discrete?

  • Conference paper
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2013 Workshops (OTM 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8186))

  • 2150 Accesses

Abstract

We investigate the category structure of categories common to conceptual modeling languages (i.e., the types used by languages such as actor, process, goal, or restriction) to study whether they more closely approximate a discrete or graded category. We find that most categories exhibit more of a graded structure, with experienced modelers displaying this even more strongly than the other participants. We discuss the consequences of these results for (conceptual) modeling in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barr, R., Caplan, L.: Category representations and their implications for category structure. Memory & Cognition 15(5), 397–418 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Diesendruck, G., Gelman, S.: Domain differences in absolute judgments of category membership: Evidence for an essentialist account of categorization. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 6(2), 338–346 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Estes, Z.: Domain differences in the structure of artifactual and natural categories. Memory & Cognition 31(2), 199–214 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Estes, Z.: Confidence and gradedness in semantic categorization: Definitely somewhat artifactual, maybe absolutely natural. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11(6), 1041–1047 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kalish, C.W.: Essentialism and graded membership in animal and artifact categories. Memory & Cognition 23(3), 335–353 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. van der Linden, D.J.T., Hoppenbrouwers, S.J.B.A., Lartseva, A., Proper, H.A.: Towards an investigation of the conceptual landscape of enterprise architecture. In: Halpin, T., Nurcan, S., Krogstie, J., Soffer, P., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Bider, I. (eds.) BPMDS 2011 and EMMSAD 2011. LNBIP, vol. 81, pp. 526–535. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B.: Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7(4), 573–605 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

van der Linden, D. (2013). Categorization of Modeling Language Concepts: Graded or Discrete?. In: Demey, Y.T., Panetto, H. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2013 Workshops. OTM 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8186. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41033-8_99

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41033-8_99

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41032-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41033-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics