Abstract
One approach to voting on several interrelated issues consists in using a language for compact preference representation, from which the voters’ preferences are elicited and aggregated. A language usually comes with a domain restriction. We consider a well-known restriction, namely, conditionally lexicographic preferences, where both the relative importance between issues and the preference between values of an issue may depend on the values taken by more important issues. The naturally associated language consists in describing conditional importance and conditional preference by trees together with conditional preference tables. In this paper, we study the aggregation of conditionally lexicographic preferences, for several voting rules and several restrictions of the framework. We characterize computational complexity for some popular cases, and show that in many of them, computing the winner reduces in a very natural way to a maxsat problem.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Ahlert, M.: Aggregation of lexicographic orderings. Homo Oeconomicus 25(3/4), 301–317 (2008)
Airiau, S., Endriss, U., Grandi, U., Porello, D., Uckelman, J.: Aggregating dependency graphs into voting agendas in multi-issue elections. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 2011, pp. 18–23 (2011)
Booth, R., Chevaleyre, Y., Lang, J., Mengin, J., Sombattheera, C.: Learning conditionally lexicographic preference relations. In: Proceeding of ECAI 2010, pp. 269–274 (2010)
Boutilier, C., Brafman, R., Domshlak, C., Hoos, H., Poole, D.: CP-nets: A tool for representing and reasoning with conditional ceteris paribus statements. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR) 21, 135–191 (2004)
Brafman, R.I., Domshlak, C., Shimony, S.E.: On graphical modeling of preference and importance. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research (JAIR) 25, 389–424 (2006)
Brams, S., Kilgour, D., Zwicker, W.: The paradox of multiple elections. Social Choice and Welfare 15(2), 211–236 (1998)
Conitzer, V., Xia, L.: Approximating common voting rules by sequential voting in multi-issue domains. In: Proceedings of KR 2012 (2012)
Dombi, J., Imreh, C., Vincze, N.: Learning lexicographic orders. European Journal of Operational Research 183, 748–756 (2007)
Garey, M., Johnson, D.: Computers and Intractability. W. H. Freeman and Company (1979)
Gigerenzer, G., Goldstein, D.: Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review 103(4), 650–669 (1996)
Jaumard, B., Simeone, B.: On the complexity of the maximum satisfiability problem for horn formulas. Information Processing Letters 26(1), 1–4 (1987)
Kohli, R., Krishnamurti, R., Mirchandani, P.: The minimum satisfiability problem. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 7(2), 275–283 (1994)
Lacy, D., Niou, E.M.: A problem with referendums. Journal of Theoretical Politics 12(1), 5–31 (2000)
Lang, J., Xia, L.: Sequential composition of voting rules in multi-issue domains. Mathematical Social Sciences 57(3), 304–324 (2009)
Pozza, G.D., Pini, M.S., Rossi, F., Venable, K.B.: Multi-agent soft constraint aggregation via sequential voting. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 2011, pp. 172–177 (2011)
Ryvchin, V., Strichman, O.: Faster Extraction of High-Level Minimal Unsatisfiable Cores. In: Sakallah, K.A., Simon, L. (eds.) SAT 2011. LNCS, vol. 6695, pp. 174–187. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Schmitt, M., Martignon, L.: On the complexity of learning lexicographic strategies. Journal of Machine Learning Research 7, 55–83 (2006)
Yaman, F., Walsh, T., Littman, M., desJardins, M.: Democratic approximation of lexicographic preference models. In: Proceedings of ICML 2008, pp. 1200–1207 (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lang, J., Mengin, J., Xia, L. (2012). Aggregating Conditionally Lexicographic Preferences on Multi-issue Domains. In: Milano, M. (eds) Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming. CP 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7514. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33558-7_69
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33558-7_69
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33557-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33558-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)