Skip to main content

Practical Implementation of a Graphics Turing Test

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 7432))

Abstract

We present a practical implementation of a variation of the Turing Test for realistic computer graphics. The test determines whether virtual representations of objects appear as real as genuine objects. Two experiments were conducted wherein a real object and a similar virtual object is presented to test subjects under specific restrictions. A criterion for passing the test is presented based on the probability for the subjects to be unable to recognise a computer generated object as virtual. The experiments show that the specific setup can be used to determine the quality of virtual reality graphics. Based on the results from these experiments, future versions of the Graphics Turing Test could ease the restrictions currently necessary in order to test object telepresence under more general conditions. Furthermore, the test could be used to determine the minimum requirements to achieve object telepresence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Slater, M., Usoh, M.: Body Centred Interaction in Immersive Virtual Environments. Artificial Life and Virtual Reality 1 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Steuer, J.: Defining virtual reality: dimensions determining telepresence. Journal of Communication 42, 73–93 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Witmer, B., Singer, M.J.: Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 7, 225–240 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Slater, M.: The Influence of Rendering Styles on Participant Responses in Immersive Virtual Environments (2007); Invited Keynote Talk: Second International Conference on Computer Graphics Theory and Applications, http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/research/vr/Projects/VLF/MediaCGTA_keynote_2007/vlf%20pit.pdf (last accessed February 24, 2012)

  5. Turing, A.M.: Computer Machinery and Intelligence. Mind LIX, 422–460 (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Meyer, G.W., Rushmeier, H.E., Cohen, M.F., Greenberg, D.P., Torrance, K.E.: An Experimental Evaluation of Computer Graphics Imagery. ACM Transactions on Graphics 5, 30–50 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. McNamara, A., Chalmers, A., Troscianko, T., Gilchrist, I.: Comparing real & synthetic scenes using human judgements of lightness. In: Proceedings of the Eurographics Workshop on Rendering Techniques 2000, pp. 207–218. Springer (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rademacher, P., Lengyel, J., Cutrell, E., Whitted, T.: Measuring the Perception of Visual Realism in Images. In: Proc. of the 12th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering Techniques, 235–248 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brack, C.D., Clewlow, J.C., Kessel, I.: Human Factors Issues in the Design of Stereo-rendered Photorealistic Objects: A Stereoscopic Turing Test. In: Proc. SPIE 2010, vol. 7524 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. McGuigan, M.D.: Graphics Turing Test (2006), http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0603132

  11. Ventrella, J., El-Nasr, M.S., Aghabeigi, B., Overington, R.: Gestural Turing Test: A Motion-Capture Experience for Exploring Nonverbal Communication. In: Proc. AAMAS International Workshop on Interacting with ECAs as Virtual Characters (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wolfe, J.M., Kluender, K.R., Levi, D.M., Bartoshuk, L.M., Herz, R.S., Klatzky, R.L., Lederman, S.J., Merfeld, D.M.: Sensation & Perception, 2nd edn., pp. 32–33. Sinauer (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Clark, R.: Notes on the Resolution and Other Details of the Human Eye (2005) last updated 2009, http://clarkvision.com/imagedetail/eye-resolution.html (last accessed December 9, 2011)

  14. McKee, S.P., Klein, S.A., Teller, D.Y.: Statistical Properties of Forced-Choice Psychometric Functions: Implications of Probit Analysis. Perception & Psychophysics 37, 786–298 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Turing, A.M.: Can automatic calculating machines be said to think?, Typescrip of broadcast discussion transmitted on BBC Third Programme, 61th sheet (1952), http://www.turingarchive.org/viewer/?id=460&title=5 (last accessed December 9, 2011)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Borg, M., Johansen, S.S., Thomsen, D.L., Kraus, M. (2012). Practical Implementation of a Graphics Turing Test. In: Bebis, G., et al. Advances in Visual Computing. ISVC 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7432. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33191-6_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33191-6_30

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33190-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33191-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics