Skip to main content

Mutual Private Set Intersection with Linear Complexity

  • Conference paper
Information Security Applications (WISA 2011)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 7115))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A private set intersection (PSI) protocol allows players to obtain the intersection of their inputs. While in its unilateral version only the client can obtain the intersection, the mutual PSI protocol enables all players to get the desired result. In this work, we construct a mutual PSI protocol that is significantly more efficient than the state-of-the-art in the computation overhead. To the best of our knowledge, our construction is the first result with linear computational complexity in the semi-honest model. For that, we come up with an efficient data representation technique, called prime representation.

This work was supported by the National Institute for Mathematical Sciences (NIMS) grant funded by the Korea government (No. A21101).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Agrawal, M., Kayal, N., Saxena, N.: PRIMES is in P. Annals of Mathematics 160(2), 781–793 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Agrawal, R., Evfimievski, A., Srikant, R.: Information sharing across private database. In: Halevy, A., Ives, Z., Doan, A. (eds.) SIGMOD, pp. 86–97 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Camenisch, J.: Proof systems for general statements about discrete logarithms. Technical Report TR 260, Dept. of Computer Science, ETH Zurich (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Camenisch, J.L., Chaabouni, R., shelat, a.: Efficient Protocols for Set Membership and Range Proofs. In: Pieprzyk, J. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2008. LNCS, vol. 5350, pp. 234–252. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Camenisch, J., Zaverucha, G.M.: Private Intersection of Certified Sets. In: Dingledine, R., Golle, P. (eds.) FC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5628, pp. 108–127. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Chaum, D.: Blind signatures for untraceable payments. In: Chaum, D., Rivest, R., Sherman, A. (eds.) Advances in Cryptology-Crypto, pp. 199–203 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cheon, J.H., Jarecki, S., Seo, J.H.: Multi-party privacy-preserving set intersection with quasi-linear complexity. Cryptology ePrint Archive, 2010/512 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cramer, R., Damgård, I., Nielsen, J.B.: Multiparty Computation from Threshold Homomorphic Encryption. In: Pfitzmann, B. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2001. LNCS, vol. 2045, pp. 280–299. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. De Cristofaro, E., Kim, J., Tsudik, G.: Linear-Complexity Private Set Intersection Protocols Secure in Malicious Model. In: Abe, M. (ed.) ASIACRYPT 2010. LNCS, vol. 6477, pp. 213–231. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. De Cristofaro, E., Tsudik, G.: Practical Private Set Intersection Protocols with Linear Computational and Bandwidth Complexity. In: Sion, R. (ed.) FC 2010. LNCS, vol. 6052, pp. 143–159. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Dachman-Soled, D., Malkin, T., Raykova, M., Yung, M.: Efficient Robust Private Set Intersection. In: Abdalla, M., Pointcheval, D., Fouque, P.-A., Vergnaud, D. (eds.) ACNS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5536, pp. 125–142. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Damgård, I., Jurik, M.: A Generalisation, a Simplification and some Applications of Paillier’s Probabilistic Public-Key System. In: Kim, K. (ed.) PKC 2001. LNCS, vol. 1992, pp. 119–136. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. El Gamal, T.: A Public Key Cryptosystem and a Signature Scheme Based on Discrete Logarithms. In: Blakely, G.R., Chaum, D. (eds.) CRYPTO 1984. LNCS, vol. 196, pp. 10–18. Springer, Heidelberg (1985)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Freedman, M.J., Nissim, K., Pinkas, B.: Efficient Private Matching and Set-Intersection. In: Cachin, C., Camenisch, J.L. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3027, pp. 1–19. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Goldreich, O.: The foundations of cryptography, vol. 2. Cambridge University Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hazay, C., Lindell, Y.: Efficient Protocols for Set Intersection and Pattern Matching with Security Against Mailicious and Covert Adversaries. In: Canetti, R. (ed.) TCC 2008. LNCS, vol. 4948, pp. 155–175. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Hazay, C., Nissim, K.: Efficient Set Operations in the Presence of Malicious Adversaries. In: Nguyen, P.Q., Pointcheval, D. (eds.) PKC 2010. LNCS, vol. 6056, pp. 312–331. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Jarecki, S., Liu, X.: Efficient Oblivious Pseudorandom Function with Applications to Adaptive ot And secure Computation of Set Intersection. In: Reingold, O. (ed.) TCC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5444, pp. 577–594. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Kissner, L., Song, D.: Privacy-Preserving Set Operations. In: Shoup, V. (ed.) CRYPTO 2005. LNCS, vol. 3621, pp. 241–257. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. MacKenzie, P.D., Yang, K.: On Simulation-Sound Trapdoor Commitments. In: Cachin, C., Camenisch, J.L. (eds.) EUROCRYPT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3027, pp. 382–400. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Mezzour, G., Perrig, A., Gligor, V., Papadimitratos, P.: Privacy-Preserving Relationship Path Discovery in Social Networks. In: Garay, J.A., Miyaji, A., Otsuka, A. (eds.) CANS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5888, pp. 189–208. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Naor, M., Pinkas, B.: Oblivious transfer and polynomial evaluation. In: STOC, pp. 245–254 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Paillier, P.: Public-Key Cryptosystems Based on Composite Degree Residuosity Classes. In: Stern, J. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 1999. LNCS, vol. 1592, pp. 223–238. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Shoup, V.: Practical Threshold Signatures. In: Preneel, B. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2000. LNCS, vol. 1807, pp. 207–220. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kim, M., Lee, H.T., Cheon, J.H. (2012). Mutual Private Set Intersection with Linear Complexity. In: Jung, S., Yung, M. (eds) Information Security Applications. WISA 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7115. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27890-7_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-27890-7_18

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-27889-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-27890-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics