Abstract
This chapter reports on an ongoing ethnographic study of folk beliefs about language teaching and learning among 108 teachers and learners of nine languages at secondary and university levels in the United States. Folk linguistics (e.g. Niedzielski and Preston 2003) emphasizes, among other things, the need for an understanding of beliefs in all areas of applied linguistics, suggesting that intervention is always improved when language professionals know the often strongly held beliefs of non-linguists and the folk theories that underlie such beliefs. Scholars such as Kalaja (2003) have pointed to the need for such research in language teaching and learning in particular. After these data were acquired, we prepared a topical outline and developed a taxonomy based on it. The details of that taxonomy with sample interpretations of respondent comment are the main focus of this chapter. The major factors discussed by the respondents were categorized as: (1) psycholinguistic, (2) structural linguistic, (3) instructional, and (4) rationales and outcomes. We believe this macrotaxonomy reflects actual concerns and beliefs teachers and students hold and are ones most deserving of more detailed investigation.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Barcelos, A. M. 1995. A cultura de aprender lingua estrangeira (inglés) de alunos de Letras. MA thesis: UNICAMP, University of Campinas, Brazil.
DeKeyser, R. 2005. Implicit and explicit learning. Handbook of second language acquisition, eds. C. J. Doughty and M. H. Long, 313-348. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Horwitz, E. K. 1995. Using student beliefs about language learning and teaching in the foreign language methods course. Foreign Language Annals 18: 333-340.
Kalaja, P. 1995. Student beliefs (or metacognitive knowledge) about SLA reconsidered. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 5: 191-204.
Kalaja, P. 2003. Research on students’ beliefs about SLA within a discursive approach. In Beliefs about SLA: New research approaches, eds. P. Kalaja and A. M. Ferreira Barcelos, 87-108. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Levinson, S. C. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Niedzielski, N. and D. R. Preston. 2003. Folk linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Preston, D. R. 1994. Content-oriented discourse analysis and folk linguistics. Language Sciences 16: 285-330.
Schiffrin, D. 1985. Everyday argument: the organization of diversity in talk. In Handbook of discourse analysis, Vol. 3: Discourse and dialogues, ed. T. Van Dijk, 35-46. London: Academic Press.
Schiffrin, D. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stalnaker, R. 1978. Assertion, In Syntax and semantics 9: Pragmatics, ed. P. Cole, 315-322. New York: Academic Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pasquale, M.D., Preston, D.R. (2013). The Folk Linguistics of Language Teaching and Learning. In: Drozdzial-Szelest, K., Pawlak, M. (eds) Psycholinguistic and Sociolinguistic Perspectives on Second Language Learning and Teaching. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23547-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23547-4_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-23546-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-23547-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)