Skip to main content

Modeling Users of Crisis Training Environments by Integrating Psychological and Physiological Data

  • Conference paper
Modern Approaches in Applied Intelligence (IEA/AIE 2011)

Abstract

This paper describes aspects of a training environment for crisis decision makers who, notoriously, operate in highly stressful and unpredictable situations. Training such decision makers is the goal of Pandora-Box, a system which is able to teach a class of trainees representing different authorities that coordinate their interventions in critical situations. This paper dwells on the selection and modeling of the relevant human features that are shown to have an influence in decision making under crisis. The chosen features are used to create a trainee model on the basis of which the system adjusts the training exercises with the ultimate goal of maximizing the effectiveness of training. Trainees models are built by merging physiological and psychological data, and are represented by means of a timeline-based approach, a representation derived from planning technology. The infrastructure built for the trainee modeling constitutes the basis to assess the influence of specific variables (e.g., personality traits, self efficacy, stress and anxiety) on the performance of crisis managers during the training.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adler, C., Pittinsky, T., Sommer, S., Zhu, W.: Measuring the efficacy of leaders to assess information and make decisions in a crisis: The C-LEAD Scale. Technical report, HKS faculty research Working Paper Series (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wooten, L.P., James, E.H.: Linking crisis management and leadership competencies: The role of human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources 10(3), 352–379 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Schoemberg, A.: Do crisis plans matter: A new perspective on leading during a crisis. Public Relations Quarterly 22, 640–657 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Funder, D.C.: The personality puzzle, 4th edn. Norton, NewYork (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Costa, P.T., McCrae, R.R.: The NEO Personality Inventory (revised) manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Northouse, G.: Leadership theory and practice, 4th edn. Sage publication, Thousand Oaks (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bales, R.F.: Task roles and social roles in problem solving groups. In: Macoby, E.E., Newcomb, T.M. (eds.) Readings in Social Psychology, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bandura, A.: Social foundations of thought and actions. A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Salas, E., Driskell, J., Hughs, S.: The study of stress and human performance. In: Driskell, J., Salas, E. (eds.) Stress and Human Performance. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. McQuiggan, S., Mott, B., Lester, J.C.: Modeling Self-Efficacy in Intelligent Tutoring Systems: An Inductive Approach. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 18, 81–123 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pittinsky, T., Hadley, C., Sommer, S.: Measuring the Efficacy of Leaders to Assess Information and Make Decisions in a Crisis: The C-LEAD Scale. Technical report, Center for Public Leadership (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Klann, G.: Crisis Leadership. Center for Creative Leadership, Greensboro, NC (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Paglis, L., Green, S.: Leadership Self-Efficacy and Managers’ Motivations for Leading Change. Journal of Organizational Behavior 23, 215–235 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Stajkovic, A., Luthans, F.: Self-efficacy and work related performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 124, 240–261 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Dickerson, S.S., Kemeny, M.E.: Acute stressors and cortisol responses: A theoretical integration and synthesis of laboratory research. Psychological Bulletin 130, 355–391 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Muscettola, N.: HSTS: Integrating Planning and Scheduling. In: Zweben, M., Fox, M.S. (eds.) Intelligent Scheduling. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Cortellessa, G. et al. (2011). Modeling Users of Crisis Training Environments by Integrating Psychological and Physiological Data. In: Mehrotra, K.G., Mohan, C.K., Oh, J.C., Varshney, P.K., Ali, M. (eds) Modern Approaches in Applied Intelligence. IEA/AIE 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 6704. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21827-9_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21827-9_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21826-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21827-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics