Analysis of Dependencies between Specific Practices in CMMI Maturity Level 2
- Cite this paper as:
- Chen X., Staples M., Bannerman P. (2008) Analysis of Dependencies between Specific Practices in CMMI Maturity Level 2. In: O’Connor R.V., Baddoo N., Smolander K., Messnarz R. (eds) Software Process Improvement. EuroSPI 2008. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 16. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
CMMI contains a collection of Process Areas (PAs), each of which contains many Specific Practices (SPs). However, the CMMI specification does not provide any explicit recommendation about which individual SPs can or should be implemented before other SPs. In this paper we identify dependencies between CMMI SPs in PAs in maturity level 2, and between the PAs. We analyzed the text of the CMMI specification to identify every Work Product (WP) produced and used by every SP in maturity level 2. Our analysis was validated by independent researchers and comparison with an existing dependency analysis shown in CMMI training materials. Our results have significance as a reference model of SP and PA dependencies for both SPI researchers and practitioners. For researchers we have provided an explicit representation of SP and PA dependencies that were previously only implicit in the CMMI specification. For practitioners, our results may provide guidance on the order of implementation of SPs and PAs. Our dependency analysis has limitations in being derived from the text of the CMMI specification – we have no direct evidence that these dependencies are valid in practice.
KeywordsSPI CMMI Specific Practice Work Products Dependency
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.