Summary
Search engines like Google are essential to navigating the Web’s endless supply of news, political information, and citizen discourse. The mechanisms and conditions under which search results are selected should therefore be of considerable interest to media scholars, political theorists, and citizens alike. In this chapter, I adopt a “deliberative” ideal for search engines and examine whether Google exhibits the “same old” media biases of mainstreaming, hypercommercialism, and industry consolidation. In the end, serious objections to Google are raised: Google may favor popularity over richness; it provides advertising that competes directly with “editorial” content; it so overwhelmingly dominates the industry that users seldom get a second opinion, and this is unlikely to change. Ultimately, however, the results of this analysis may speak less about Google than about contradictions in the deliberative ideal and the so-called “inherently democratic” nature of the Web.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
AdWordsRep: Top position? Impossible? In: Search Engine Watch Forums. http://forums.searchenginewatch.com/showthread.php?t=2952 (2004). Cited 9 Apr 2007
Anderson C The long tail. Wired 12(10). http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/12.10/tail.html (2004). Cited 9 Apr 2007
Arnold S In search of clicks that make cash: three search companies are all chasing the same pool of advertising spend. World Information Review (1 Apr 2003)
Associated Press v. United States, 326 U.S. 1, US Supreme Court (1945)
Bagdikian B (1992) The media monopoly, 4th edn Beacon Press, Boston
Barabási (2002) A Linked: the new science of networks. Perseus Books, Cambridge
Benhabib S (1996) Toward a deliberative model of democratic legitimacy. In: Democracy and difference: contesting the boundaries of the political. ed by Benhabib, S. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 67–94
Bhargava H, Feng J (2002) Paid placement strategies for Internet search engines. In: Proceedings of the WWW2002 Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii. http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=511462 (2002). Cited 8 Apr 2007. pp 117–123
Bricklin D (2002) Why small players matter. Dan Bricklin’s Web site. http://www.bricklin.com/smallplayers.htm (2002). Cited 10 Apr 2005
Brin S, Page L (1998) The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. Seventh International WWW Conference, Brisbane, Australia. http://www-db.stanford.edu/pub/papers/google.pdf (April 1998). Cited 1 May 2005
Burns E (2007) Top U.S. parent companies and stickiest brands on the Web, February 2007. Clickz Network. http://www.clickz.com/showPage.html?page=3625269 (2007). Cited 9 Apr 2007
Cho J, Adams R (2003) Page quality: in search of an unbiased web ranking. Technical report, UCLA Computer Science Department. http://oak.cs.ucla.edu/cho/papers/cho-quality-long.pdf (2003). Cited 9 Apr 2007
Cho J, Roy S (2004) Impact of search engines on page popularity. In: Proceedings of the WWW2004 Conference, New York. http://oak.cs.ucla.edu/cho/papers/cho-bias.pdf (May 2004). Cited 6 Aug 2006
Cho J, Garcia-Molina H, Page L (1998) Efficient crawling through URL ordering. In: Proceedings of 7th World Wide Web Conference, http://dbpubs.stanford.edu/pub/1998–51 (2000). Cited 9 Apr 2007
CNN.com: Four sites account for half of Web surfing. http://www.cnn.com/2001/TECH/Internet/06/05/Internet.consolidation/ (5 June 2001). Cited 27 Apr 2004
Compaine B, Gomery D (2000) Who owns the media? competition and concentration in the mass media industry, 3rd edn, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah
Cooper M (2003) Media ownership and democracy in the digital information age. http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blogs/cooper/archives/mediabooke.pdf (2003). Cited 15 May 2005
Cooper M, Cooper S (2003) Hope and hype v. reality: The role of the commercial Internet in democratic discourse and prospects for institutional change. Stanford Law School Center for Internet and Society. http://cyberlaw.stanford.edu/blogs/cooper/archives/HOPEALL.pdf (2003). Cited 7 May 2005
Cornfield M, Rainie L (2003) Untuned keyboards: online campaigners, citizens, and portals in the 2002 elections. In: Pew Internet and American Life Project. http://www.pewInternet.org/pdfs/PIP_IPDI_Politics_Report.pdf (2004). Cited 11 May 2005
Crowell G (2003) The “secret system” of search engine advertising. In: Search Engine Watch. http://searchenginewatch.com/_subscribers/articles/article.php/3289361 (2003). Cited 28 Apr 2004
Cunningham F (2002) Theories of democracy: a critical introduction. Routledge, New York
Denver Area Educational Telecommunications Consortium, Inc., et al. v. Federal Communications Commission et al., 518 U.S. 727, US Supreme Court(1996)
Diaz A (2005) Through the google goggles: sociopolitical bias in search engine design. Undergraduate honors thesis, Stanford University
The Economist (2004) Spiders in the web (15 May) pp 16
Elster J (ed) (1998) Deliberative democracy. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Fallows D (2005) Search engine users: Internet searchers are confident, satisfied, and trusting–but they are also unaware and naïve. In: Pew Internet and American Life Project. http://www.pewInternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Searchengine_users.pdf (2005). Cited 8 Apr 2007
Fallows D, Rainie L (2004) The popularity and importance of search engines. In: Pew Internet and American Life Project. http://www.pewInternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Data_Memo_Searchengines.pdf (2004). Cited 10 May 2005
Felten E (2004) Googleocracy in action. In: Freedom to Tinker. http://freedom-to-tinker.com/archives/000509.html (2004). Cited 15 May 2005
Ferguson C (2005) What’s next for google? The search firm wants to organize all digital information; that means war with Microsoft. Technology Review: MIT’s Magazine of Innovation 108: 38–46
Fishkin J (1991) Democracy and deliberation: new directions for democratic reform. Yale University Press, New Haven
Fortunato S, Flammini A, Menczer F, Vespignani A (2006) The egalitarian effect of search engines. In: Proceedings of the WWW2006 Conference, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. http://arxiv.org/pdf/cs.CY/0511005 (May 2006). Cited 6 Aug 2006
Gallagher D (2002) U.S. Warns web sites to label sponsorships. The New York Times (2 July 2002)
Gerhart S (2004) Do web search engines suppress controversy? First Monday 9(1). http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue9_1/gerhart/index.html (2004). Cited 1 May 2005
Glover T (2005) Search engines power new dotcom boom. Sunday Business (27 March 2005)
Goldman E (2006) Search engine bias and the demise of search engine utopianism. Yale Journal of Law and Technology 8: 188–200
Google (2004) Our search: google technology. http://www.google.com/technology (2004). Cited 13 May 2005
Google (2005) Google adwords content policy. http://adwords.google.com/select/contentpolicy.html (2005). Cited 21 Mar 2005
Google (2006) Financial data. google investor relations. http://investor.google.com/fin_data.html (2006). Cited 6 Aug 2006
Grossman L (2003) Search and destroy: a gang of web search companies is gunning for Google. Time (22 Dec 2003) pp 46–50
Habermas J (1990) Moral consciousness and communicative action. MIT, Cambridge
Hague, Mayor et al. v. Committee for Industrial Organization et al., 307 U.S. 496, US Supreme Court (1939)
Hansell S (2001) Clicks for sale: paid placement is catching on in web searches. The New York Times (4 June 2001)
Hansell S (2005) Search sites play a game of constant catch-up. The New York Times (31 Jan 2005)
Hindman M, Tsioutsiouliklis K, Johnson J (2003) Googlearchy: how a few heavily-linked sites dominate politics on the Web. In: Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/hindman03googlearchy.html (2003). Cited 8 Apr 2007
Hippsley H (2002) Re complaint requesting investigation of various Internet search engine companies for paid placement and paid inclusion programs. U.S. Federal Trade Commission. http://www.ftc.gov/os/closings/staff/commercialalertletter.htm (2002). Cited 20 May 2004
Introna L, Nissenbaum H (2000) Shaping the web: why the politics of search engines matters. The Information Society 16: 1–17
Johnson J (2003) Google accepts porn ads but refuses those for guns. CNSNews. http://www.cnsnews.com/Culture/archive/200310/CUL20031007c.html (2003). Cited 23 July 2003
Katz E (1973) The two-step flow of communication: an up-to-date report of a hypothesis. In: Marketing classics: a selection of influential articles, ed by Enis, B., Cox, K. Allyn and Bacon, Boston
Kopytoff V (2004) Google ad rules complex, controversial: documents reveal details about what the popular search engine accepts, rejects. San Francisco Chronicle (9 Aug 2004)
Kottke J (2003) Weblogs and power laws. http://kottke.org/03/02/weblogs-and-power-laws. Cited 1 Aug 2006
Lasica JD (1996) Interview with John Perry Barlow. http://www.jdlasica.com/interviews/barlow.html (1996). Cited 25 April 2004
Lessig L (2004) Free culture: how big media uses technology and the law to lock down culture and control creativity. Penguin, New York
Levy S (1995) How the propeller heads store the electronic future. New York Times Magazine (Sep 24) pp 58–59
Liedtke M (2004) Google bans environmental group’s ads. USA Today Online. http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2004–02-12-google-bans-ad_x.htm (12 Feb 2004). Cited 10 June 2004
Markoff J, Zachary G (2003) In searching the web, google finds riches. The New York Times (13 Apr)
Marshall M (2005) Google founders’ brashness sparks debate. San Jose Mercury News (18 Aug)
Mayer M (2005) Progress in research and ads (talk). In: Google factory tour. (Google.com, 2005), http://www.google.com/intl/en/press/factorytour.html (2005). Cited 20 May 2005
McChesney R (1999) Oligopoly: the big media game has fewer and fewer players. The Progressive (November) 1: 20–24
McChesney R (2000) Rich media, poor democracy: communication politics in dubious times. New Press, New York
McGinn R (1990) Science, technology and society. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs
Mill JS (1978) On liberty, 1859, ed by Rapaport, E. Hackett, Indianapolis
Miller L (2001) How to net results in search-site seas. USA Today (13 Aug)
Miller M (2005) Broadband everywhere: Internet explorer still dominates the web, but firefox is growing fast and igniting innovation. PC Magazine. http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0, 1759, 1770267, 00.asp (22 March 2005). Cited 9 Apr 2007
Mowshowitz A, Kawaguchi A (2002) Bias on the web. Communications of the ACM 45: 56–60
Nielsen//Netratings: Google accounts for half of all U.S. searches in April. http://www.nielsen-netratings.com/pr/pr_060525 (25 May). Cited 31 July 2006
Olsen S (2002) The google gods: does search engine’s power threaten web’s independence? CNet News. http://news.com.com/2009–1023-963618.html (31 Oct 2002). Cited 9 Apr 2007
Ostrom M (2003) Pasadena, calif: commercial search firm to buy web search properties. San Jose Mercury News (26 Feb)
Page B (1996) Who deliberates? University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Page L, Brin S, Motwani R, Winograd T (2007) The pagerank citation ranking: bringing order to the web. http://dbpubs.stanford.edu/pub/1999–66 (1999). Cited 8 Apr 2007
Pagendarm M, Schaumurg H (2001) Why are users banner-blind? The impact of navigation style on the perception of web banners. Journal of Digital Information 2 http://journals.tdl.org/jodi/article/view/jodi-37/38
Pandey S, Roy S, Olston C, Cho J (2005) Shuffling a stacked deck: The case for partially randomizing ranking of search engine results. http://reports-archive.adm.cs.cmu.edu/anon/2005/CMU-CS-05–116.pdf(2005). Cited 8 Apr 2007
Prather M. (2002) Ga-ga for google. Entrepreneur Magazine. http://www.entrepreneur.com/article/0,4621,297807,00.html. Cited 9 Apr 2007
Princeton Survey Research Associates: A Matter of Trust: What Users want From Web Sites. Results of a National Survey of Internet Users for Consumer WebWatch. http://www.pewtrusts.org/pdf/vf_web_watch_trust_0402.pdf. Cited 8 Apr 2007
Raschtchy S, Avilio J (2003) Industry note: search symposium shows bigger role for search in advertising. U.S. Bancorp Piper Jaffray. http://marketwatch.multexinvestor.com/download.asp?docid=29692599&sid=26. Cited 5 Feb 2005
Reinhardt A (2003) And you thought the web ad market was dead: sales of so-called ‘Paid placement’ listings are soaring. In: BusinessWeek Online. http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/03_18/b3831134_mz034.htm (2003). Cited 8 Apr 2007
Rodzvilla J (2002) (ed) We’ve got blog: how weblogs are changing our culture. Perseus Books, Cambridge
Rosenberg S (1998) Yes there is a better search engine: while the portal sites fiddle, Google catches fire. Salon.com. http://archive.salon.com/21st/rose/1998/12/21straight.html (1998). Cited 5 Mar 2005
Rostbøll C (2005) Preferences and paternalism: on freedom and deliberative democracy. Political Theory 33: 370–396
Schuler D (2003) Reports of the close relationship between democracy and the Internet may have been exaggerated. In: Democracy and New Media, ed by Jenkins, H., Thorbum, D. MIT, Cambridge
Sheff D (2004) Playboy interview: google guys. Playboy 51: 55–60, 142–145
Sheu T, Carley K (2001) Monopoly power on the web: a preliminary investigation of search engines. In: Proceedings of the 29th Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, Alexandria, Virginia. http://arxiv.org/as/cs.CY/0109054. Cited 7 May 2005
Sullivan D (1998) NetRatings search engine ratings, June 1998. Search Engine Watch. http://searchenginewatch.com/mhts/9806–10-netratings.mht. Cited 20 Dec 2004
Sullivan D (2001a) Nielsen NetRatings Search engine Ratings, December 2000. Search Engine Watch. http://searchenginewatch.com/mhts/9902–0012-netratings.mht. Cited 21 Dec 2004
Sullivan D (2001b) The end for search engines? Clickz Experts. http://www.clickz.com/experts/search/opt/article.php/837281. Cited 23 Dec 2004
Sullivan D (2002) FTC recommends disclosure to search engines. Search Engine Watch. http://searchenginewatch.com/sereport/article.php/2164891. Cited 20 May 2004
Sullivan D (2003a) Buying your way in search engine advertising chart. In: Search Engine Watch. http://searchenginewatch.com/wemasters/article.php/2167941. Cited 20 May 2004
Sullivan D (2003b) comScore Media Metrix search engine ratings, August 2003. Search Engine Watch. http://searchenginewatch.com/mhts/0305-mediametrix.mht. Cited 1 May 2005
Sullivan D (2005) ComScore Media Metrix search engine ratings, December 2004. Search Engine Watch. http://searchenginewatch.com/reports/article.php/2156431. Cited 8 May 2005
Sunstein C (1997) Deliberation, democracy, and disagreement. In: Justice and democracy: cross-cultural perspectives, ed by Bontekoe, R., Stepaniants, M. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu, pp 92–117
Sunstein C (2001) Republic.com. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Telang R, Mukhopadhyay T, Wilcox R (1999) An empirical analysis of the antecedents of Internet search engine choice. Workshop on Information Systems and Economics, Charlotte, North Carolina
Upstill T, Craswell N, Hawking D (2003) Predicting fame and fortune: pagerank or indegree? In: Eighth Australasian Document Computing Symposium, Canberra, Australia. http://cs.anu.edu.au/mTrystan.Upstill/pubs/upstill_adcs03.pdf. Cited 10 May 2005
van Couvering E (2004) New media? The political economy of Internet search engines. Presented at the Annual Conference of the International Association of Media and Communications Researchers, Porto Alegre, Brazil. http://www.media.uio.no/prosjekter/ctp/papers/IAMCR-CTP04_S1–1_vanCouver.pdf. Cited 9 Apr 2007
van Vark C (2004) Search engines: search still sets the pace. Revolution (21 Apr)
Walters R, Lee A (2003) Ask jeeves to join excite Internet. The Financial Times (5 March)
Weinberger D (2002) Small pieces loosely joined: a unified theory of the web. Perseus, Cambridge
Wellman B, Haythornthwaite C (eds) The Internet in everyday life. Blackwells, Oxford
Zetland D. (2005) Is Google evil? Knowledge commodification, community and innovation. Presented at the Tenth International Kal Polanyi Conference, Istanbul (14 Oct). http://www.kysq.org/pubs/IsGoogleEvil.pdf. Cited 12 Nov 2007
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Diaz, A. (2008). Through the Google Goggles: Sociopolitical Bias in Search Engine Design. In: Spink, A., Zimmer, M. (eds) Web Search. Information Science and Knowledge Management, vol 14. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75829-7_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75829-7_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-75828-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-75829-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)