Appositions Versus Double Subject Sentences – What Information the Speech Analysis Brings to a Grammar Debate

  • Horia-Nicolai Teodorescu
  • Diana Trandabăţ
Conference paper

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-74628-7_38

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4629)
Cite this paper as:
Teodorescu HN., Trandabăţ D. (2007) Appositions Versus Double Subject Sentences – What Information the Speech Analysis Brings to a Grammar Debate. In: Matoušek V., Mautner P. (eds) Text, Speech and Dialogue. TSD 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4629. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

Abstract

We propose a method based on spoken language analysis to deal with controversial syntactic issues; we apply the method to the problem of the double subject sentences in the Romanian language. The double subject construction is a controversial linguistic phenomenon in Romanian. While some researchers accept it as a language ‘curiosity’ (specific only to the Asian languages, but not to the European ones), others consider it apposition-type structure, in order to embody its behavior in the already existing theories. This paper brings a fresh gleam of light over the debate, by presenting what we believe to be the first study on the phonetic analysis of double-subject sentences in order to account for its difference vs. the appositional constructions.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Horia-Nicolai Teodorescu
    • 1
    • 2
  • Diana Trandabăţ
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute for Computes Science, Romanian Academy 
  2. 2.Faculty of Electronics and Telecommunications, Technical University “Gh. Asachi” of Iaşi 
  3. 3.Faculty of Computer Science, University “Al. I. Cuza” of Iaşi 

Personalised recommendations