Skip to main content

Complex Event Processing in ThingML

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover System Analysis and Modeling. Technology-Specific Aspects of Models (SAM 2016)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 9959))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Complex Event Processing (CEP) is concerned with real-time detection of complex events within multiple streams of atomic occurrences. Numerous approaches in CEP have been already proposed in the literature. In this paper, we examine the CEP Extension of ThingML which is a cross-platform modeling language for deploying Cyber Physical System (CPS). In particular, we focus on both language characteristic and performance of the ThingML Extension while processing CEP queries. Experiments show that although ThingML does not outperform other well-known CEP engines, it is still a potential CEP solution for CPS which has limited physical resources. In addition, ThingML also shows its efficiency in term of language expressiveness in comparison with State Machine based CEP queries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Head project. http://heads-project.eu/

  2. ThingML. http://thingml.org/pmwiki.php

  3. Yourkit profiler. https://www.yourkit.com/

  4. Arasu, A., Cherniack, M., Galvez, E., Maier, D., Maskey, A.S., Ryvkina, E., Stonebraker, M., Tibbetts, R.: Linear road: a stream data management benchmark. In: Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Vol. 30, pp. 480–491. VLDB Endowment (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bizarro, P.: BiCEP-benchmarking complex event processing systems. In: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Buchmann, A., Koldehofe, B.: Complex event processing. IT-Information Technology Methoden und innovative Anwendungen der Informatik und Informationstechnik 51(5), 241–242 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chandrasekaran, S., Cooper, O., Deshpande, A., Franklin, M.J., Hellerstein, J.M., Hong, W., Krishnamurthy, S., Madden, S.R., Reiss, F., Shah, M.A.: TelegraphCQ: continuous dataflow processing. In: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, p. 668. ACM (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cugola, G., Margara, A.: Processing flows of information: from data stream to complex event processing. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 44(3), 15 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Demers, A.J., Gehrke, J., Panda, B., Riedewald, M., Sharma, V., et al.: Cayuga: a general purpose event monitoring system

    Google Scholar 

  10. EsperTech: Esper (2016). http://www.espertech.com/esper/. Accessed 3 Feb 2016

  11. Fleurey, F., Morin, B., Solberg, A.: A model-driven approach to develop adaptive firmwares. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems, SEAMS 2011, pp. 168–177. ACM, New York (2011). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1988008.1988031

  12. Geppert, A., Berndtsson, M., Lieuwen, D., Zimmermann, J.: Performance evaluation of active database management systems using the beast benchmark. Technical report. Citeseer (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Geppert, A., Berndtsson, M., Lieuwen, D.F., Roncancio, C.: Performance evaluation of object-oriented active database systems using the beast benchmark. TAPOS 4(3), 135–149 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grabs, T., Lu, M.: Measuring performance of complex event processing systems. In: Nambiar, R., Poess, M. (eds.) TPCTC 2011. LNCS, vol. 7144, pp. 83–96. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32627-1_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Mathew, A.: Benchmarking of complex event processing engine-esper. Technical report, Technical Report IITB/CSE/2014/April/61, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Maharashtra, India (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mendes, M., Bizarro, P., Marques, P.: A framework for performance evaluation of complex event processing systems. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Distributed Event-Based Systems, pp. 313–316. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mendes, M., Bizarro, P., Marques, P.: Towards a standard event processing benchmark. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/SPEC International Conference on Performance Engineering, pp. 307–310. ACM (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mendes, M.R.N., Bizarro, P., Marques, P.: A performance study of event processing systems. In: Nambiar, R., Poess, M. (eds.) TPCTC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5895, pp. 221–236. Springer, Heidelberg (2009). doi:10.1007/978-3-642-10424-4_16

    Google Scholar 

  19. Robins, D.: Complex event processing. In: Second International Workshop on Education Technology and Computer Science. Wuhan (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Sachs, K., Kounev, S., Bacon, J., Buchmann, A.: Performance evaluation of message-oriented middleware using the SPECjms2007 benchmark. Perform. Eval. 66(8), 410–434 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmerken, I.: Deciphering the myths around complex event processing. Wall Street & Technology, May 2008. http://www.wallstreetandtech.com/latency/deciphering-the-myths-around-complex-event-processing/d/d-id/1259489?

  22. Suhothayan, S., Gajasinghe, K., Loku Narangoda, I., Chaturanga, S., Perera, S., Nanayakkara, V.: Siddhi: a second look at complex event processing architectures. In: Proceedings of the 2011 ACM Workshop on Gateway Computing Environments, GCE 2011, pp. 43–50. ACM, New York (2011). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2110486.2110493

  23. Tucker, P., Tufte, K., Papadimos, V., Maier, D.: Nexmark-a benchmark for queries over data streams (draft). Technical report, OGI School of Science & Engineering at OHSU, September 2008

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wahl, A., Hollunder, B.: Performance measurement for cep systems. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conferences on Advanced Service Computing, pp. 116–121 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wu, E., Diao, Y., Rizvi, S.: High-performance complex event processing over streams. In: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pp. 407–418. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to An Ngoc Lam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lam, A.N., Haugen, Ø. (2016). Complex Event Processing in ThingML. In: Grabowski , J., Herbold, S. (eds) System Analysis and Modeling. Technology-Specific Aspects of Models . SAM 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9959. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46613-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46613-2_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46612-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46613-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics