Abstract
The lack of funding often becomes a crucial factor of development in early stages of entrepreneurship, despite the existence of innovative ideas and properly developed business plans. Although start-ups objectively should not be target clients of the banks, the most part of credit institutions publicly promote special loans and support programs for new entrepreneurs. The aim of the research is to study the real feasibility of start-ups to attract bank funds and compare with alternative sources such as crowdfunding and peer-to-peer (P2P) landing. To verify the possibility to attract bank funding the control experiments were carried out in several Latvia’s financial Institutions. It was shown that bank funding in start-up phase of entrepreneurship in practice is not likely possible. The main reasons of rejections were identified. Analysis of different forms and models of collective financing marketplaces showed that crowdfunding and peer-to-peer lending becomes a good alternative to traditional sources of funding. A survey of new entrepreneurs has been done to detect the main problems of funding. The lack of sufficient knowledge of new entrepreneurs about potential sources of financing, including crowdfunding and P2P landing, was found. The comparison of collective financing platforms and formal sources of funding in early stages of entrepreneurship was done.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
The size classes in this research follow the definitions employed by the Eurostat Structural Business Statistics database: micro enterprises (0–9 persons employed), small enterprises (10–49 persons employed), medium-sized enterprises (50–250 persons employed), and large enterprises (250+ persons employed). It should be noted that this definition deviates from the official EU definition of SMEs which defines SMEs on the basis of a combination of the number of persons employed and turnover and/or the total size of the balance sheet. The SBS and EC employment size classes are identical.
- 2.
Commercial companies are economically active companies of which excluded self-employed persons, individual merchants, peasant and fishermen’s farms.
References
Altum. (2015). [online]. Accessed June 11, 2015, from http://www.altum.lv/
Baeck, P., Collins, L., & Zhang, Z. (2014). Understanding alternative finance. The U.K. Alternative Finance Industry Report 2014. [online]. Accessed September 26, 2015, from http://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/understanding-alternative-finance-2014.pdf
Bank of Latvia. (2014). Finansu stabilitātes parskats 2013/14 [Financial stability report 2013/14] [online]. Accessed August 10, 2015, from https://www.bank.lv/images/stories/pielikumi/publikacijas/FSP_2013-2014.pdf
Bradford, C. S. (2012). Crowdfunding and the federal securities laws. Columbia Business Law, 1(1), 1–150.
Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia. (2014). Statistical enterprise register [online]. Accessed March 27, 2015, from http://data.csb.gov.lv/pxweb/en/uzreg/uzreg__ikgad/?rxid=cdcb978c-22b0-416a-aacc-aa650d3e2ce0
Collis, J., & Hussey, R. (2009). Business research (3rd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cross-Sectorial Coordination Centre. (2013). National development plan of Latvia for 2014–2020 [online]. Accessed May 10, 2015, from http://www.pkc.gov.lv/images/NAP2020%20dokumenti/NDP2020_English_Final__.pdf
European Commission. (2013a). Annual Report on European SMEs [online]. Accessed July 11, 2015, from http://ec.europa.eu/growth/smes/business-friendly-environment/performance-review/files/supporting-documents/2013/annual-report-smes-2013_en.pdf
European Commission. (2013b). ECB-European Commission SMEs’ access to finance survey [online]. Accessed March 15, 2015, from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/finance/files/2013-safe-analytical-report_en.pdf
European Crowdfunding Network. (2015). [online] Accessed March 25, 2015, from http://eurocrowd.org/2014/05/23/startup-europe-crowdfunding-network-final-report/
Griffin, Z. (2013). Crowdfunding: Fleecing the American Masses. Journal of Law, Technology and the Internet, 4(2), 375–410.
Jick, T. D. (1979). Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 602–611.
Kickstarter. (2014). AirDog: World’s first auto-follow drone for GoPro Camera [online]. Accessed 10 July 2015, from https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/airdog/airdog-worlds-first-auto-follow-action-sports-dron/description
Kmuehmel. (2009). [online]. Accessed July 11, 2015, from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Startup_financing_cycle.svg
Lambert, T., & Schwienbacher, A. (2014). An empirical analysis of crowdfunding. Journal of Business Venturing, 29(5), 585–609.
Lursoft. (2013). Mikro un mazie uznemumi Latvijas ekonomika ienem aizvien nozimigaku lomu [Lursoft study: Micro and small enterprises in the Latvian economy plays an increasingly important role] [online]. Accessed December 28, 2013, from http://www.lursoft.lv/press/2013/05/30/Lursoft-petijums-Mikro-un-mazie-uznemumi-Latvijas-ekonomika-ienem-aizvien-nozimigaku-lomu
Markowitz, E. (2013). 22 Crowdfunding sites (and how to choose yours). IncMagazine, 6 [online]. Accessed July 28, 2015, from http://www.inc.com/magazine/201306/eric-markowitz/how-to-choose-a-crowdfunder.html
Marom, D., & Sade, O. (2013). Are the life and death of an early stage venture indeed in the power of the tongue? Lessons from online crowdfunding pitches. Jerusalem School of business [online]. Accessed May 28, 2015, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2255707
Massolution. (2013).The crowdfunding industry report [online]. Accessed March 26, 2015, from http://www.compromisoempresarial.com/wp-content/uploads/137356857-Massolution-2013CF-Excerpt-Revised-04182.pdf
Mitra, D. (2012). The role of crowdfunding in entrepreneurial finance. Delhi Business Review, 12(2), 67–72.
Omnicom Media Group. (2014). [online]. Accessed 14 March 2015, from www.snapshots.lv
Rao, L. (2012). Fundraising platform for startups ProFounder shuts its doors. TechCrunch, [online]. Accessed July 17, 2015, from http://techcrunch.com/2012/02/17/startup-fundraising-platform-profounder-shuts-its-doors/
Salkind, N. J. (2013). Statistics for people who (think they) hate statistics: Excel 2010 edition (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Schwienbacher, A., & Larralde, B. (2012). Crowdfunding of small entrepreneurial ventures. In D. Cumming (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of entrepreneurial finance (pp. 369–392). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Strickler, Y. (2015). How projects launch on Kickstarter. Kickstarter blog [online]. Accessed August 4, 2015, from https://www.kickstarter.com/blog/how-projects-launch-on-kickstarter
Zhang, Z., Wardrop, R., Rau, P., & Gray, M. (2015). Alternative finance report [online]. London: University of Cambridge. Accessed September 2, 2015, from https://www.jbs.cam.ac.uk/fileadmin/user_upload/research/centres/alternative-finance/downloads/2015-uk-alternative-finance-benchmarking-report.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kreituss, I. (2017). Collective Financing Marketplaces: Alternative to Bank Funding in Early Stages of Entrepreneurship. In: Bilgin, M., Danis, H., Demir, E., Can, U. (eds) Country Experiences in Economic Development, Management and Entrepreneurship. Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46319-3_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46319-3_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46318-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46319-3
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)