Abstract
We present conditions for the emergence of singularities in DGE models. We distinguish between slow-fast and impasse singularity types, review geometrical methods to deal with both types of singularity and apply them to DGE dynamics. We find that impasse singularities can generate new types of DGE dynamics, in particular temporary determinacy/indeterminacy. We illustrate the different nature of the two types of singularities and apply our results to two simple models: the Benhabib and Farmer (1994) model and one with a cyclical fiscal policy rule.
We acknowledge, without implicating, the useful comments by Alain Venditti, Nuno Barradas, and an anonymous referee. This work is part of UECE’s strategic project PEst-OE/EGE/UI0436/2014. UECE has financial support from national funds by FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
We use the notation for derivatives \(f_{x}\equiv \frac{\partial y}{\partial x }\) and \(f_{xy}\equiv \frac{\partial ^{2}y}{\partial x\partial y}\).
- 2.
For simplicity we exclude the existence of periodic solutions, but the analysis can easily be extended to that case.
- 3.
Observe that we are now referring to a two-dimensional projection in (K, L) of a three-dimensional system in (K, L, C).
- 4.
See Kuehn (2015) for a recent textbook presentation.
- 5.
- 6.
Recall we are assuming that \(\delta (K,L,\epsilon )\ne 0\).
- 7.
A singular impasse point is a point in \(\mathcal {S}\) such that \(\nabla \delta = \mathbf 0 \).
- 8.
Indeed, a one-dimensional manifold.
- 9.
A zero-dimensional manifold.
- 10.
For a proof, see Cardin et al. (2012) inter alia.
- 11.
Benhabib and Farmer (1994, p. 34) already noted this behavior for particular values of the parameters: “As \(\chi \) moves below \(-0.015\) the roots both become real but remain negative until at (approximately) \(\chi =-0.05\) [i.e. \(\epsilon =0\)] one root passes through minus infinity and reemerges as a positive real root”. To compare with our results please note that we introduced a slight change in notation: while the authors set \(\chi \) as non-positive we set \(\chi \) as non-negative.
- 12.
For another example in a macro model with imperfect competition see Brito et al. (2016).
- 13.
Considering that we have an infinitely-lived representative household, it would act as if budget was balanced at all moments in time, i.e. Ricardian equivalence holds.
- 14.
One special case is given by \(\phi =G\) and \(\mu =-1\), corresponding to setting the expenditure level.
- 15.
We thank an anonymous referee and Nuno Barradas for suggesting this clarification.
References
Barnett, W. A., & He S. (2010). Existence of singularity bifurcation in an Euler-equations model of the United States economy: Grandmont was right. Economic Modelling, 27(6), 1345–1354.
Benhabib, J., & Farmer, R. (1994). Indeterminacy and increasing returns. Journal of Economic Theory, 63, 19–41.
Brito, P., Costa, L., & Dixon, H. (2016). Singular macroeconomic dynamics and temporary indeterminacy. Mimeo.
Cardin, P. T., da Silva, P. R., & Teixeira, M. A. (2012). Implicit differential equations with impasse singularities and singular perturbation problems. Israel Journal of Mathematics, 189, 307–322.
Cass, D., & Shell, K. (1983). Do sunspots matter? Journal of Political Economy, 91(2), 193–227.
Fenichel, N. (1979). Geometric singular perturbation theory for ordinary differential equations. Journal of Difference Equations and Applications, 31, 53–98.
Grandmont, J.-M. (1985). On endogenous competitive business cycles. Econometrica, 53, 995–1045.
Grandmont, J. -M. (1998). Expectations formation and stability of large socioeconomic systems. Econometrica, 66(4), 741–782.
Grandmont, J. -M. (2008). Nonlinear difference equations, bifurcations and chaos: An introduction. Research in Economics, 62(3), 122–177.
Grandmont, J.-M., Pintus, P., & de Vilder, R. (1998). Capital-labor substitution and competitive nonlinear endogenous business cycles. Journal of Economic Theory, 80(1), 14–59.
Guckenheimer, J., & Holmes, P. (1990). Nonlinear oscillations and bifurcations of vector fields (2nd ed.). Springer.
He, Y., & Barnett, W. A. (2006). Singularity bifurcations. Journal of Macroeconomics, 28, 5–22.
Kuehn, C. (2015). Multiple time scale dynamics (1st ed.). Applied Mathematical Sciences 191. Springer.
Kuznetsov, Y. A. (2005). Elements of applied bifurcation theory (3rd ed.). Springer.
Llibre, J., Sotomayor, J., & Zhitomirskii, M. (2002). Impasse bifurcations of constrained systems. Fields Institute Communications, 31, 235–256.
Stiglitz, J. (2011). Rethinking macroeconomics: What failed, and how to repair it. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(4), 591–645.
Zhitomirskii, M. (1993). Local normal forms for constrained systems on 2-manifolds. Boletim da Sociedade Brasileira de Matemática, 24, 211–232.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
To simplify notation let \(x=(x_{1},x_{2})\equiv (K,L)\) and consider functions \(f_{1}(x)\), \(f_{2}(x)\), and \(\delta (x)\). In addition, consider the two vector fields F(x), as in Eq. (3.13), and \(F^{r}(x) \), as in Eq. (3.27). Then, at a regular steady-state (\(\bar{ x}\)), we have \(f_{1}(\bar{x})=f_{2}(\bar{x})=0\) and \(\delta (\bar{x})\ne 0\). Furthermore, at a generic impasse-transversal point (\(x^{i}\)), we have \( \delta (x^{i})=f_{2}(x^{i})=0\) and \(f_{1}(x^{i})\ne 0\).
Lemma 4
Assume there is one generic impasse-transversal point \(x^{i}\) and one regular steady-state \(\bar{x}\), both belonging to a set X, such that \(f_{2,x_{2}}(x)\) has the same sign for any point \(x\in X\). Therefore, \(\mathrm {sign}\left( \det DF^{r}(x^{i})\right) =-\mathrm {sign} \left( \det DF(\bar{x})\right) \).
Proof
For sake of simplicity, let us set \(\epsilon (\varphi ) = 1\). The determinants of the Jacobian for F(x) evaluated at the steady-state and \(F^{r}(x)\) at an impasse-transversal point are respectively given by
First, note that both points share a common condition \(f_2 (x_1, x_2) = 0\). If this function is differentiable, we can write \(\nabla f_2 (x) \cdot dx = 0\). By computing Taylor approximations to \(f_1 (x^i)\) in a neighbourhood of \(\bar{x}\) and to \(\delta (\bar{x})\) in a neighbourhood of \(x^i\), and considering the differentiability of \(f_2\left( \cdot \right) \), we obtain:
Thus,
\(\square \)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brito, P.B., Costa, L.F., Dixon, H.D. (2017). From Sunspots to Black Holes: Singular Dynamics in Macroeconomic Models. In: Nishimura, K., Venditti, A., Yannelis, N. (eds) Sunspots and Non-Linear Dynamics. Studies in Economic Theory, vol 31. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44076-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44076-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44074-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44076-7
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)