Skip to main content

A Water Perspective on Land Competition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Land Use Competition

Abstract

This chapter reflects on land competition from a water perspective. Conceptual thoughts are enriched with evidence drawn from case studies as well as other published studies about both land and water. At the same time, it lays down an analytical framework for these case studies. Starting with a discussion of the inherent relationship between land and water, we explore recent disconnects in land and water studies that make it difficult to collate empirical evidence and comprehensive understanding of how competition between water and land are inherently linked. For us the term competition refers to gaining access to or control over—either land or water—and thus simultaneously captures social and material dimensions. To address these linkages, we employ the concept of waterscapes. One way of seeing waterscapes is through the lens of the competition that occurs at specific places, in various positions and on/across various scales, thereby capturing a combined view of land and water. The notion of waterscapes is mainly used by scholars from the fields of political ecology and critical geography thinking to explore how power is wielded, and in determining when and where who or what gets how much water/land. We briefly review the different notions of competition in disconnected literature concerning land and water in order to instil a further analytical dimension: whilst the term “competition” is increasingly used in land change science to refer to the global rush for land, water scholars refer rather to the various means of water governance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agnew, J. (1997). The dramaturgy of horizons: Geographical scale in the ‘Reconstruction of Italy’ by the new Italian political parties, 1992–1995. Political Geography, 16(2), 99–121. doi:10.1016/S0962-6298(96)00046-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allan, J. A. (2003). Virtual water—the water, food, and trade nexus. Useful concept or misleading metaphor?: Water international. Water International, 28(1), 106–113. doi:10.1080/02508060.2003.9724812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allan, J. A., Keulertz, M., Sojamo, S., & Warner, J. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of land and water grabs in Africa: Foreign direct investment and food and water security (1st ed.). London: Routledge international handbooks. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, K. (2002). From state to market?: Water mercantilización in Spain. Environment and Planning A, 34 (5), 767–790. doi:10.1068/a3425

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakker, K. (2009). Water. In N, Castree., D. Demeritt., D. Liverman., & B. Rhoads, (Eds.), A companion to environmental geography (pp. 515–532). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandaragoda, D. J. (2006). Water-land linkages: A relatively neglected issue in IWRM. In P. P. Mollinga, A. Dixit, & K. Athukorala (Eds.), Integrated water resources management: Global theory, emerging practice, and local needs (pp. 172–185). New Delhi, Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, J. (2012). Pumping possibility: Agricultural expansion through desert reclamation in Egypt. Social Studies of Science, 42(4), 517–538. doi:10.1177/0306312712438772

    Google Scholar 

  • Biermann, F., Betsill, M. M., Gupta, J., Kanie, N., Lebel, L., Liverman, D., et al. (2009). Earth system governance. People, places, and the planet: Science and implementation plan of the earth system governance project 20. Accessed January 21, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boroto, J. R., Chiramba, T., Mafuta, C. & Williams, T. O. (2014). Analysis of impacts of large-scale investments in agriculture on water resources, ecosystems and livelihoods; and development of policy options for decision makers: Summary of initial findings. http://www.grida.no/publications/water-grab/

  • Borras, S. M., Franco, J., Wang, C. (2012). Competing political tendencies in global governance of land grabbing. Discussion paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (1998). Between fixity and motion: Accumulation, territorial organization and the historical geography of spatial scales. Environment and Planning D, 16 459–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruns, A. (2015). Wasser- und Bodenschutz in der Landschaftsplanung. In W. Riedel, H. Lange, E. Jedicke, & M. Reinke (Eds.), Landschaftsplanung (pp. 1–9). Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Budds, J. (2009). Contested H2O: Science, policy and politics in water resources management in Chile. Geoforum, 40(3), 418–430. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.12.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budds, J. (2013). Water, power, and the production of neoliberalism in Chile, 1973–2005. Environment and Planning D. Society and Space 31(2), 301–318. doi:10.1068/d9511

    Google Scholar 

  • Budds, J., & Hinojosa-Valencia, L. (2012). Restructuring and rescaling water governance in mining contexts: The co-production of waterscapes in Peru. Water Alternatives, 5(1), 119–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A., & Davidson, S. (2011). The watershed approach: Challenges, antecedents, and the transition from technical tool to governance unit. Water Alternatives, 4(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conway, D., van Garderen, E. A., Deryng, D., Dorling, S., Krueger, T., Landman, W., et al. (2015). Climate and southern Africa’s water-energy-food nexus. Nature Climate Change, 5(9), 837–846.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortner, H., & Moote, M. (1994). Trends and issues in land and water resources management: Setting the agenda for change. Environmental Management, 18(2), 167–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cotula, L. (2012). The international political economy of the global land rush: A critical appraisal of trends, scale, geography and drivers. Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(3–4), 649–680. doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.674940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vries, D. H. (2011). Temporal vulnerability in hazardscapes: Flood memory-networks and referentiality along the North Carolina Neuse River (USA). Global Environmental Change, 21(1), 154–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Baldassarre, G., Kemerink, J. S., Kooy, M., & Brandimarte, L. (2014). Floods and societies: The spatial distribution of water-related disaster risk and its dynamics. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 1(2), 133–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falkenmark, M. (1979). Main problems of water use and transfer of technology. GeoJournal, 3(5), 435–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falkenmark, M. (1997). Society’s interaction with the water cycle: A conceptual framework for a more holistic approach. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 42(4), 451–466. doi:10.1080/02626669709492046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falkenmark, M., & Folke, C. (2002). The ethics of socio-ecohydrological catchment management: Towards hydrosolidarity. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 6(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2012). Coping with water scarcity: An action framework for agriculture and food security. Rome: FAO Water Reports.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franco, J., Mehta, L., & Veldwisch, G. J. (2013). The global politics of water grabbing. Third World Quarterly, 34(9), 1651–1675. doi:10.1080/01436597.2013.843852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gheewala, S., Berndes, G., & Graham, J. (2011). The bioenergy and water nexus. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 5(4), 353–360.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. C., Ostrom, E., & Ahn, T. (2000). The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: a survey. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 217–239. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00092-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleick, P. (2002). Water management: Soft water paths. Nature, 418(6896), 373.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • GWP, Global Water Project. (2014). Coordinating land and water governance: An essential part of achieving food security. Perspectives paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberl, H. (2015). Competition for land: A sociometabolic perspective. Ecological Economics, 119, 424–431. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.10.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haberl, H., Mbow, C., Deng, X., Irwin, E. G., Kerr, S., Kuemmerle, T., et al. (2014). Finite land resources and competition. In K. C. Seto & A. Reenberg (Eds.), Rethinking global land use in an urban era (Vol. 14, pp. 35–69). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanjra, M. A., & Qureshi, M. E. (2010). Global water crisis and future food security in an era of climate change. Food Policy, 35(5), 365–377. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2010.05.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, S. (2004). Land and water—the right interface. Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keys, P. W., van der Ent, R. J., Gordon, L. J., Hoff, H., Nikoli, R., & Savenije, H. H. G. (2012). Analyzing precipitation sheds to understand the vulnerability of rainfall dependent regions. Biogeosciences, 9(2), 733–746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, T., Maynard, C., Carr, G., Bruns, A., Mueller, E. N., & Lane, S. (2016). A transdisciplinary account of water research. WIREs Water, 3, 369–389. doi:10.1002/wat2.1132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambin, E., & Meyfroidt, P. (2011). Global land use change, economic globalization, and the looming land scarcity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(9), 3465–3472. doi:10.1073/pnas.1100480108.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lankford, B. A. (2013). Resource efficiency complexity and the commons: The paracommons and paradoxes of natural resource losses, Wastes and Wastages. Abingdon: Earthscan Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankford, B. A., Tumbo, S., & Rajabu, K. (2009). Water competition, variability and river basin governance: A critical analysis of the Great Ruaha River, Tanzania. In F. Molle & P. Wester (Eds.), River basin trajectories: Societies, environments and development (pp. 171–195). Cambridge, MA: CABI.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lebel, L., Garden, P., & Imamura, M. (2005). The politics of scale, position, and place in the governance of water resources in the Mekong region. Ecology and Society, 10(2), 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linton, J., & Budds, J. (2014). The hydrosocial cycle: Defining and mobilizing a relational-dialectical approach to water. Geoforum, 57, 170–180. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.10.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, A. (2007). Working the socio-natural relations of the urban waterscape in South Africa. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(1), 41–59. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2007.00708.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loftus, A., & Lumsden, F. (2008). Reworking hegemony in the urban waterscape. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 33(1), 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, L., Veldwisch, G. J. & Franco, J. (2012). Introduction to the special issue: Water grabbing? Focus on the (Re)appropriation of finite water resources. Water Alternatives, 5(2), 193–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molle, F. (2007). Scales and power in river basin management: The Chao Phraya river in Thailand1. The Geographical Journal, 173(4), 358–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molle, F. (2009). River-basin planning and management: The social life of a concept. Geoforum, 40(3), 484–494. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2009.03.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molle, F., Wester, P. (Eds.). (2009). River basin trajectories: Societies, environments and development. Comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture series (vol 8). Cambridge, MA: CABI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, T., & Newig, J. (2010). Multilevel water governance and problems of scale: Setting the stage for a broader debate. Environmental Management, 46(1), 1–6. doi:10.1007/s00267-010-9531-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, E. S., & Bakker, K. (2009). Transgressing scales: Water governance across the Canada–U.S. Borderland. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 99(1), 99–117. doi:10.1080/00045600802317218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, E., Bakker, K., & Cook, C. (2012). Introduction to the themed section: Water governance and the politics of scale. Water Alternatives, 5(1), 52–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira, G. D. (2013). Land regularization in Brazil and the global land grab. Development and Change, 44(2), 261–283. doi:10.1111/dech.12009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1999). Revisiting the Commons: Local Lessons. Global Challenges. Science, 284(5412), 278–282. doi:10.1126/science.284.5412.278.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl, C., Holtz, G., Kastens, B., & Knieper, C. (2010). Analyzing complex water governance regimes: The management and transition framework. Environmental Science & Policy, 13(7), 571–581. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2010.08.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D., Fricska, S. & Wehrmann, B. (2009). Towards improved land governance. Land tenure working paper, vol 11. UN-HABITAT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perreault, T., Wraight, S., & Perreault, M. (2012). Environmental injustice in the Onondaga Lake waterscape, New York State, USA. Water Alternatives, 5(2), 485–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrone, N. M. (2013). Restrictions to foreign acquisitions of agricultural land in Argentina and Brazil. Globalizations, 10(1), 205–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qadir, M., Wichelns, D., Raschid-Sally, L., McCornick, P. G., Drechsel, P., Bahri, A., & Minhas, P. S. (2010). The challenges of wastewater irrigation in developing countries. Agriculture Water Management, 97(4), 561–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringler, C., Bhaduri, A., & Lawford, R. (2013). The nexus across water, energy, land and food (WELF): potential for improved resource use efficiency? Aquatic and marine systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(6), 617–624. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.11.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockström, J., Gordon, L., Folke, C., Falkenmark, M., & Engwall, M. (1999). Conservation ecology: Linkages between water vapor flows, food production and terrestrial ecosystem services. Conservation Ecology, 3(2), 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rulli, M. C., Saviori, A., & D’Odorico, P. (2013). Global land and water grabbing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(3), 892–897. doi:10.1073/pnas.1213163110.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sikor, T., Auld, G., Bebbington, A. J., Benjaminsen, T. A., Gentry, B. S., Hunsberger, C., et al. (2013). Global land governance: From territory to flow? Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 5(5), 522–527. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2013.06.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, T. W., Sharpley, A. N., Howarth, R. W., Paerl, H. W., & Mankin, K. R. (2008). The new gold rush: Fueling ethanol production while protecting water quality. Journal of Environmental Quality, 37(2), 318–324. doi:10.2134/jeq2007.0599.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sjöstedt, M. (2011). The impact of secure land tenure on water access levels in sub-Saharan Africa: The case of Botswana and Zambia. Habitat International, 35(1), 133–140. doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.06.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, J. & Cotula, L. (2011). Are land deals drivingwater grabs? The global land rush. http://pubs.iied.org/17102IIED

  • Steffen, W. (2009). Interdisciplinary research for managing ecosystem services. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(5), 1301–1302. doi:10.1073/pnas.0812580106.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. (1997). Neither global nor local: ‘Glocalization’ and the politics of scale. Spaces of globalization: Reasserting the power of the local.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. (1999). Modernity and hybridity: Nature, regeneracionismo, and the production of the Spanish waterscape, 1890–1930. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89(3), 443–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. (2004). Social power and the urbanization of water: Flows of power. Oxford, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. (2009). The political economy and political ecology of the hydro-social cycle. Journal of Contemporary Water Research & Education, 142(1), 56–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Land Matrix Global Observatory. (2016). Agricultural drivers for land deals. http://www.landmatrix.org/en/get-the-idea/agricultural-drivers/. Accessed January 31, 2016.

  • Trottier, J. (2008). Water crises: Political construction or physical reality? Contemporary Politics, 14(2), 197–214. doi:10.1080/13569770802176929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, A. (2011). The commodification of the public service of water: A normative perspective. Public Reason, 3(2), 90–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, B., Borras, Jr, Saturnino, M., Hall, R., Scoones, I., & Wolford, W. (2012). The new enclosures: Critical perspectives on corporate land deals. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(3–4), 619–647. doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.691879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolford, W., Borras, S. M., Hall, R., Scoones, I., & White, B. (2013). Governing global land deals: The role of the state in the rush for land. Development and Change, 44(2), 189–210. doi:10.1111/dech.12017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeitoun, M., & Mirumachi, N. (2008). Transboundary water interaction I: Reconsidering conflict and cooperation. International Environmental Agreements, 8(4), 297–316. doi:10.1007/s10784-008-9083-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, A. (2011). Everyday governance of the waste waterscapes—A Foucauldian analysis in Delhi’s informal settlements. Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelm Universität Bonn.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Emily Raab and Viviana Wiegleb for their support. This research is partly funded by BMBF Global Change Research under the reference number 01LN1316A.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antje Bruns .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bruns, A., Krueger, T., Lankford, B., Frick, F., Grasham, C., Spitzbart-Glasl, C. (2016). A Water Perspective on Land Competition. In: Niewöhner, J., et al. Land Use Competition. Human-Environment Interactions, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33628-2_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics