Skip to main content

The Fifth Automated Negotiating Agents Competition (ANAC 2014)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Recent Advances in Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiation

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 638))

Abstract

In May 2014, we organized the Fifth International Automated Negotiating Agents Competition (ANAC 2014) in conjunction with AAMAS 2014. ANAC is an international competition that challenges researchers to develop a successful automated negotiator for scenarios where there is incomplete information about the opponent. One of the goals of this competition is to help steer the research in the area of bilateral multi-issue negotiations, and to encourage the design of generic negotiating agents that are able to operate in a variety of scenarios. 21 teams from 13 different institutes competed in ANAC 2014. This chapter describes the participating agents and the setup of the tournament, including the different negotiation scenarios that were used in the competition. We report on the results of the qualifying and final round of the tournament.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We note that, in the competition each agent plays both preference profiles, and therefore it would be possible in theory to learn the opponent’s preferences. However, the rules explicitly disallow learning between negotiation sessions, and only within a negotiation session. This is done so that agents need to be designed to deal with unknown opponents.

  2. 2.

    The combinations of 10 agents are \(10 \times 9 / 2\), however, agents play each domain against each other twice by switching the roles.

  3. 3.

    http://ii.tudelft.nl/genius.

References

  1. Baarslag, T., Fujita, K., Gerding, E.H., Hindriks, K.V., Ito, T., Jennings, N.R., Jonker, C.M., Kraus, S., Lin, R., Robu, V., Williams, C.R.: Evaluating practical negotiating agents: results and analysis of the 2011 international competition. Artif. Intell. 198, 73–103 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baarslag, T., Hindriks, K.V., Jonker, C.M., Kraus, S., Lin, R.: The first automated negotiating agents competition (ANAC 2010). In: New Trends in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiations, pp. 113–135. Springer (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fujita, K., Ito, T., Baarslag, T., Hindriks, K.V., Jonker, C.M., Kraus, S., Lin, R.: The second automated negotiating agents competition (ANAC 2011). In: Complex Automated Negotiations: Theories, Models, and Software Competitions, pp. 183–197. Springer (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gal, Y.K., Ilany, L.: The fourth automated negotiation competition. In: Next Frontier in Agent-Based Complex Automated Negotiation, pp. 129–136. Springer (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ito, T., Klein, M., Hattori, H.: A multi-issue negotiation protocol among agents with nonlinear utility functions. Multiagent Grid Syst. 4(1), 67–83 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Kraus, S.: Strategic Negotiation in Multiagent Environments. MIT Press (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lin, R., Kraus, S., Baarslag, T., Tykhonov, D., Hindriks, K.V., Jonker, C.M.: Genius: an integrated environment for supporting the design of generic automated negotiators. Comput. Intell. 30(1), 48–70 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. McKelvey, R.D., Palfrey, T.R.: An experimental study of the centipede game. Econometrica 60(4), 803–36 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Osborne, M., Rubinstein, A.: Bargaining and Markets. Economic Theory, Econometrics, and Mathematical Economics. Academic Press (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Osborne, M.J., Rubinstein, A.: A Course in Game Theory. MIT Press Books. The MIT Press (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rubinstein, A.: Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica 50(1), 97–109 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Williams, C.R., Robu, V., Gerding, E.H., Jennings, N.R.: An overview of the results and insights from the third automated negotiating agents competition (ANAC 2012). In: Novel Insights in Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiation, pp. 151–162. Springer (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the team of masters students at Nagoya Institute of Technology, Japan for their valuable help in the organization of the ANAC 2014 competition.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katsuhide Fujita .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fujita, K., Aydoğan, R., Baarslag, T., Ito, T., Jonker, C. (2016). The Fifth Automated Negotiating Agents Competition (ANAC 2014). In: Fukuta, N., Ito, T., Zhang, M., Fujita, K., Robu, V. (eds) Recent Advances in Agent-based Complex Automated Negotiation. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 638. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30307-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30307-9_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30305-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30307-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics