Skip to main content

The Everyone City: How ICT-Based Participation Shapes Urban Form

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Planning Support Systems and Smart Cities

Abstract

Citizen participation is a cornerstone of urban planning. One common criticism is that the process can be cumbersome and slow. However, in the face of recent advances in information and communication technologies (ICT), those problems can be easily overcome, making it possible to extend public participation to a wider sphere of urban planning matters. But what do we know of how ICT-based public participation affects urban form? What does a city shaped by social networks and other ICT-tools look like? We develop an agent-based model of urban growth to improve our understanding of these issues. Our model consists of a spatially disaggregated, micro-economic-based, real estate market model coupled with an ICT-based planning process. In the model, public participation is based on social network affiliation and preferences over the height of buildings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alonso, W. (1964). Location and land use. Toward a general theory of land rent. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brabham, D. C. (2009). Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. Planning Theory, 8(3), 242–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Briassoulis, H. (n.d.). Analysis of land use change: Theoretical and modeling approaches. The web book of regional science. http://www.rri.wvu.edu/Webbook/Briassoulis/contents.htm. Accessed January 22, 2015.

  • Brown, D. G., Page, S. E., Riolo, R., et al. (2004). Agent-based and analytical modeling to evaluate the effectiveness of greenbelts. Environmental Modelling and Software, 19(12), 1097–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. G., Robinson, D. T., An, L., et al. (2008). Exurbia from the bottom-up: Confronting empirical challenges to characterizing a complex system. Geoforum, 39(2), 805–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caruso, G., Peeters, D., Cavailhès, J., et al. (2007). Spatial configurations in a periurban city. A cellular automata-based microeconomic model. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 37(5), 542–567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caruso, G., Peeters, D., Cavailhès, J., et al. (2009). Space—time patterns of urban sprawl, a 1D cellular automata and microeconomic approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36(6), 968–988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cinyabuguma, M., & McConnell, V. (2013). Urban growth externalities and neighborhood incentives: Another cause of Urban Sprawl? Journal of Regional Science, 53(2), 332–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czamanski, D., & Broitman, D. (2012). Developers’ choices under varying characteristic time and competition among municipalities. The Annals of Regional Science, 49(3), 733–743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czamanski, D., & Roth, R. (2011). Characteristic time, developers’ behavior and leapfrogging dynamics of high-rise buildings. The Annals of Regional Science, 46(1), 101–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desouza, K. C., & Bhagwatwar, A. (2012). Citizen apps to solve complex urban problems. Journal of Urban Technology, 19(3), 107–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devisch, O. T. J., Timmermans, H. J. P., Arentze, T. A., et al. (2009). An agent-based model of residential choice dynamics in nonstationary housing markets. Environment and Planning A, 41(8), 1997–2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ettema, D. (2011). A multi-agent model of urban processes: Modelling relocation processes and price setting in housing markets. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 35(1), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans-Cowley, J., & Hollander, J. (2010). The new generation of public participation: Internet-based participation tools. Planning Practice and Research, 25(3), 397–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Filatova, T., Parker, D., & Van der Veen, A. (2009). Agent-based urban land markets: Agent’s pricing behavior, land prices and urban land use change. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 12(13). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/12/1/3.html. Accessed October 29, 2013.

  • Filatova, T., Voinov, A., van der Veen, A. (2011). Land market mechanisms for preservation of space for coastal ecosystems: An agent-based analysis. Environmental Modelling and Software, 26(2), 179–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glaeser, E.L., & Gyourko, J. (2002). The impact of zoning on housing affordability. Working paper National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w8835. Accessed January 21, 2015.

  • Iovanna, R., & Vance, C. (2013). Land conversion and market equilibrium: Insights from a simulated landscape. The Annals of Regional Science, 50(1), 169–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., & Liu, X. (2007). Defining agents’ behaviors to simulate complex residential development using multicriteria evaluation. Journal of Environmental Management, 85(4), 1063–1075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, X., & Liu, X. (2008). Embedding sustainable development strategies in agent-based models for use as a planning tool. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22(1), 21–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ligmann-Zielinska, A., & Jankowski, P. (2010). Exploring normative scenarios of land use development decisions with an agent-based simulation laboratory. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 34(5), 409–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Louviere, J., & Timmermans, H. (1990). Hierarchical information integration applied to residential choice behavior. Geographical Analysis, 22(2), 127–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magliocca, N., Safirova, E., McConnell, V., et al. (2011). An economic agent-based model of coupled housing and land markets (CHALMS). Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 35(3), 183–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monticino, M., Acevedo, M., Callicott, B., et al. (2007). Coupled human and natural systems: A multi-agent-based approach. Environmental Modelling and Software the Implications of Complexity for Integrated Resources the Second Biannual Meeting of the International Environmental Modelling and Software Society: Complexity and Integrated Resources Management, 22(5), 656–663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, D., & Meretsky, V. (2004). Measuring pattern outcomes in an agent-based model of edge-effect externalities using spatial metrics. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 101(2–3), 233–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. T., & Brown, D. G. (2009). Evaluating the effects of land-use development policies on ex-urban forest cover: An integrated agent-based GIS approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 23(9), 1211–1232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, P., & Hopkins, L. (1987). Behavior of land developers: planning and the economics of information. Environment and Planning A, 19(9), 1221–1232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, S., Parker, D. C., Huang, Q., et al. (2014). Market impacts on land-use change: An agent-based experiment. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104(3), 460–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Thünen, J.R. (1826). The isolated state. English edition 1966, Oxford: Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheaton, W. C., & Simonton, W. E. (2007). The secular and cyclic behavior of ‘true’ construction costs. The Journal of Real Estate Research, 29(1), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo: Center for connected learning and computer-based modeling. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zellner, M., Page, S., Rand, W., et al. (2009). The emergence of zoning policy games in exurban jurisdictions: Informing collective action theory. Land Use Policy, 26(2), 356–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zellner, M., Riolo, R., Rand, W., et al. (2010). The problem with zoning: Nonlinear effects of interactions between location preferences and externalities on land use and utility. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37(3), 408–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Levy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Levy, S., Martens, K., van der Heijden, R. (2015). The Everyone City: How ICT-Based Participation Shapes Urban Form. In: Geertman, S., Ferreira, Jr., J., Goodspeed, R., Stillwell, J. (eds) Planning Support Systems and Smart Cities. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18368-8_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics