Abstract
Citizen participation is a cornerstone of urban planning. One common criticism is that the process can be cumbersome and slow. However, in the face of recent advances in information and communication technologies (ICT), those problems can be easily overcome, making it possible to extend public participation to a wider sphere of urban planning matters. But what do we know of how ICT-based public participation affects urban form? What does a city shaped by social networks and other ICT-tools look like? We develop an agent-based model of urban growth to improve our understanding of these issues. Our model consists of a spatially disaggregated, micro-economic-based, real estate market model coupled with an ICT-based planning process. In the model, public participation is based on social network affiliation and preferences over the height of buildings.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alonso, W. (1964). Location and land use. Toward a general theory of land rent. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Brabham, D. C. (2009). Crowdsourcing the public participation process for planning projects. Planning Theory, 8(3), 242–262.
Briassoulis, H. (n.d.). Analysis of land use change: Theoretical and modeling approaches. The web book of regional science. http://www.rri.wvu.edu/Webbook/Briassoulis/contents.htm. Accessed January 22, 2015.
Brown, D. G., Page, S. E., Riolo, R., et al. (2004). Agent-based and analytical modeling to evaluate the effectiveness of greenbelts. Environmental Modelling and Software, 19(12), 1097–1109.
Brown, D. G., Robinson, D. T., An, L., et al. (2008). Exurbia from the bottom-up: Confronting empirical challenges to characterizing a complex system. Geoforum, 39(2), 805–818.
Caruso, G., Peeters, D., Cavailhès, J., et al. (2007). Spatial configurations in a periurban city. A cellular automata-based microeconomic model. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 37(5), 542–567.
Caruso, G., Peeters, D., Cavailhès, J., et al. (2009). Space—time patterns of urban sprawl, a 1D cellular automata and microeconomic approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36(6), 968–988.
Cinyabuguma, M., & McConnell, V. (2013). Urban growth externalities and neighborhood incentives: Another cause of Urban Sprawl? Journal of Regional Science, 53(2), 332–348.
Czamanski, D., & Broitman, D. (2012). Developers’ choices under varying characteristic time and competition among municipalities. The Annals of Regional Science, 49(3), 733–743.
Czamanski, D., & Roth, R. (2011). Characteristic time, developers’ behavior and leapfrogging dynamics of high-rise buildings. The Annals of Regional Science, 46(1), 101–118.
Desouza, K. C., & Bhagwatwar, A. (2012). Citizen apps to solve complex urban problems. Journal of Urban Technology, 19(3), 107–136.
Devisch, O. T. J., Timmermans, H. J. P., Arentze, T. A., et al. (2009). An agent-based model of residential choice dynamics in nonstationary housing markets. Environment and Planning A, 41(8), 1997–2013.
Ettema, D. (2011). A multi-agent model of urban processes: Modelling relocation processes and price setting in housing markets. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 35(1), 1–11.
Evans-Cowley, J., & Hollander, J. (2010). The new generation of public participation: Internet-based participation tools. Planning Practice and Research, 25(3), 397–408.
Filatova, T., Parker, D., & Van der Veen, A. (2009). Agent-based urban land markets: Agent’s pricing behavior, land prices and urban land use change. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 12(13). http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/12/1/3.html. Accessed October 29, 2013.
Filatova, T., Voinov, A., van der Veen, A. (2011). Land market mechanisms for preservation of space for coastal ecosystems: An agent-based analysis. Environmental Modelling and Software, 26(2), 179–190.
Glaeser, E.L., & Gyourko, J. (2002). The impact of zoning on housing affordability. Working paper National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w8835. Accessed January 21, 2015.
Iovanna, R., & Vance, C. (2013). Land conversion and market equilibrium: Insights from a simulated landscape. The Annals of Regional Science, 50(1), 169–184.
Li, X., & Liu, X. (2007). Defining agents’ behaviors to simulate complex residential development using multicriteria evaluation. Journal of Environmental Management, 85(4), 1063–1075.
Li, X., & Liu, X. (2008). Embedding sustainable development strategies in agent-based models for use as a planning tool. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 22(1), 21–45.
Ligmann-Zielinska, A., & Jankowski, P. (2010). Exploring normative scenarios of land use development decisions with an agent-based simulation laboratory. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 34(5), 409–423.
Louviere, J., & Timmermans, H. (1990). Hierarchical information integration applied to residential choice behavior. Geographical Analysis, 22(2), 127–144.
Magliocca, N., Safirova, E., McConnell, V., et al. (2011). An economic agent-based model of coupled housing and land markets (CHALMS). Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 35(3), 183–191.
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology, 27(1), 415–444.
Monticino, M., Acevedo, M., Callicott, B., et al. (2007). Coupled human and natural systems: A multi-agent-based approach. Environmental Modelling and Software the Implications of Complexity for Integrated Resources the Second Biannual Meeting of the International Environmental Modelling and Software Society: Complexity and Integrated Resources Management, 22(5), 656–663.
Parker, D., & Meretsky, V. (2004). Measuring pattern outcomes in an agent-based model of edge-effect externalities using spatial metrics. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 101(2–3), 233–250.
Robinson, D. T., & Brown, D. G. (2009). Evaluating the effects of land-use development policies on ex-urban forest cover: An integrated agent-based GIS approach. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 23(9), 1211–1232.
Schaeffer, P., & Hopkins, L. (1987). Behavior of land developers: planning and the economics of information. Environment and Planning A, 19(9), 1221–1232.
Sun, S., Parker, D. C., Huang, Q., et al. (2014). Market impacts on land-use change: An agent-based experiment. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104(3), 460–484.
Von Thünen, J.R. (1826). The isolated state. English edition 1966, Oxford: Pergamon.
Wheaton, W. C., & Simonton, W. E. (2007). The secular and cyclic behavior of ‘true’ construction costs. The Journal of Real Estate Research, 29(1), 1.
Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo: Center for connected learning and computer-based modeling. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
Zellner, M., Page, S., Rand, W., et al. (2009). The emergence of zoning policy games in exurban jurisdictions: Informing collective action theory. Land Use Policy, 26(2), 356–367.
Zellner, M., Riolo, R., Rand, W., et al. (2010). The problem with zoning: Nonlinear effects of interactions between location preferences and externalities on land use and utility. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37(3), 408–428.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Levy, S., Martens, K., van der Heijden, R. (2015). The Everyone City: How ICT-Based Participation Shapes Urban Form. In: Geertman, S., Ferreira, Jr., J., Goodspeed, R., Stillwell, J. (eds) Planning Support Systems and Smart Cities. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18368-8_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18368-8_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18367-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18368-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)