Skip to main content

Beyond ‘Apps’ on Tablets: Making Sense of Learning Within Technology Ecologies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1581 Accesses

Part of the book series: Human–Computer Interaction Series ((HCIS))

Abstract

The vision of Vannevar Bush and Douglas Englebart of using computers to augment the human intellect more than half a century ago has been taken to heart by technology designers and computer scientists. Much technological progress has been made that allows the rampant use of laptops, desktops, tablets and smartphones in daily tasks to help us in thinking and learning. However, the single device can only go so far to facilitate higher-level thinking. We advance that the possibilities of the augmentation of human intellect by digital technologies are limited unless we design for the various technologies to function together in ecologies. In this paper, we present a theoretical foundation using Lev Vygotsky’s sign mediation theory to articulate a design framework identifying key processes that should be supported to assist higher-level thinking. We also provide examples of affordances that can help the design of effective technology ecologies within our framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Murray, J. (1997). Hamlet on the Holodeck: The future of narrative in cyberspace (p. 324; Anonymous. Vol. 1997). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chu, S., Quek, F., Endert, A., Chung, H., & Sawyer, B. (2012). The physicality of technological devices in education: building a digital experience for learning. Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT), 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on. IEEE, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chu, S. L., & Quek, F. (2013). Information Holodeck: Thinking in Technology Ecologies. In Human-Computer Interaction–INTERACT 2013 (pp. 167–184). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blume, H. (2014). L.A. school board moves forward with computer effort. http://articles.latimes.com/2014/jan/14/local/la-me-lausd-20140115. Accessed 15 April 2014.

  5. AppleInsider Staff. (2014). Los Angeles school district earmarks $ 115M for additional iPads. http://appleinsider.com/articles/14/01/15/los-angeles-school-district-earmarks-115m-for-additiional-ipads. Accessed 18 March 2014.

  6. Campbell, A. (2011). At a U. of Kentucky Dorm, a Live-In iPad Experience. 2011 Sept. 23rd [cited 2011 December 27th]. http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/at-a-u-kentucky-dorm-a-live-in-ipad-experience/33380?sid=wc&utm_source=wc&utm_medium=en. Accessed 18 Dec 2011.

  7. Ferenstein, G. (2011). Apple’s iPad officially passes the higher education test. 2011 Feb. 14th. http://www.fastcompany.com/1727292/apple-ipad-officially-passes-the-higher-eduction-test-exclusive. Accessed 27 Dec 2011.

  8. Hu, W. (2011). Math that moves: Schools embrace the iPad. New York Times 2011 Jan. 4th. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/05/education/05tablets.html?pagewanted=all. Accessed 27 Dec 2011

  9. Seton Hill University. (2011). iPad2 for everyone. http://www.setonhill.edu/techadvantage/index.cfm. Accessed 27 Dec 2011

  10. Lopez, S. (2013). New problems surface in L.A. Unified’s iPad program. http://www.latimes.com/local/la-me-0929-lopez-ipad-20130929,0,2398142.column—axzz2yyzmZPy6. Accessed 15 April 2014.

  11. Rick, J. (2009). Towards a classroom ecology of devices: Interfaces for collaborative scripts. In Workshop at 8th international conference on Computer Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL2009): “Scripted vs. Free CS collaboration: Alternatives and paths for adaptable and flexible CS scripted collaboration”. Rhodes, Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Coughlan, T., et al. (2012). The conceptual framing, design and evaluation of device ecologies for collaborative activities. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70(10), 765–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jung, H., Stolterman, E., Ryan,W., Thompson, T., & Siegel, M. (2008). Toward a framework for ecologies of artifacts: How are digital artifacts interconnected within a personal life? In Proceedings of the 5th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: Building bridges (pp. 201–210). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Andrienko, G., et al. (2010). Space, time and visual analytics. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24(10), 1577–1600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Card, S.K. and Pirolli, P. (2005). Sensemaking processes of intelligence analysts and possible leverage points as identified through cognitive task analysis. In international conference on intelligence analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). In A. Kozulin (Ed.), Thought and language. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kirsh, D. (2013). Thinking with external representations. In Cognition beyond the brain (pp. 171–194). London: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Vygotsky, L. S. (Ed.). (1987). In A. Kozulin (Ed.), Thought and language (Edited and translated by E. Hanfmann and G. Vakar). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Internalization of higher psychological functions. In M. Cole et al. (Ed.), Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (pp. 52–57). Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two. Psychology Review, 63, 81–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McNeill, D., et al. (2008). MIND-MERGING. In E. Moresella (Ed.), Expressing oneself/expressing one’s self: Communication, language, cognition, and identity: A festschrift in honor of Robert M. Krauss (11/8/07). Abingdon: Taylor & Francis Pubs.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation (1st ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Halverson, C. A. (2002). Activity theory and distributed cogntion: Or what does CSCW need to do with theories? Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 11, 243–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Erickson, T. D. (1993). Working with interface metaphors. In B. Laurel (Ed.), The art of human-computer interface design (pp. 65–73). Chicago: Addison-Wesley Publishing Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Sellen, A. J., & Harper, R. H. (2003). The myth of the paperless office. Cambridge: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Heidegger, M. (1962). In J. Macquarrie (Ed.), Being and time. New York: Harper & Row Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shipman III, F. M., & Marshall, C. C. (1994). Roles, characteristics, and affordances of spatialized information. In Proceedings of the ACM ECHT ’94 workshop on spatial metaphors, ACM European Conference on Hypertext.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Card, S. K., Robertson, G. G., & Mackinlay, J. D. (1991). The information visualizer, an information workspace. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Dropbox. (2011). Dropbox. http://www.dropbox.com/. Accessed 8 Dec 2014.

  32. Evernote. (2011). Evernote. http://www.evernote.com/. Accessed 8 Dec 2014.

  33. Gillespie, A., & Cornish, F. (2010). Intersubjectivity: Toward a dialogical analysis. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 40, 19–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work has been partially supported by NSF grants # IIS-0954048 and IIS-1059398.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sharon Lynn Chu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chu, S., Quek, F. (2015). Beyond ‘Apps’ on Tablets: Making Sense of Learning Within Technology Ecologies. In: Hammond, T., Valentine, S., Adler, A., Payton, M. (eds) The Impact of Pen and Touch Technology on Education. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15594-4_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15594-4_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15593-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15594-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics