Skip to main content

Improving Manual Change Impact Analysis with Tool Support: A Study in an Industrial Project

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Software Quality. Software and Systems Quality in Distributed and Mobile Environments (SWQD 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 200))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Change impact analysis is a challenging activity due to the usually huge number of dependencies that have to be considered. Nevertheless it is still often performed manually, relying on expert knowledge and intuition. The aim of this paper is to evaluate the practice of manual change impact analysis and to explore the benefits of tool support in the context of an industrial project. A study has been conducted with experienced developers estimating the changes necessary for implementing bug fixes and feature requests extracted from the project’s history. The results of the manual change impact analysis showed a low estimation performance, which could be improved with tool support to achieve a higher number of hits at the expense of more false positives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bohner, S.A., Arnold, R.S.: Software Change Impact Analysis. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Buckner, J., Buchta, J., Petrenko, M., Rajlich, V.: JRipples: a tool for program comprehension during incremental change. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Workshop on Program Comprehension (IWPC ’05), pp. 149–152. IEEE Computer Society (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cornelissen, B., Zaidman, A., van Deursen, A., Moonen, L., Koschke, R.: A systematic survey of program comprehension through dynamic analysis. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 35(5), 684–702 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cubranic, D., Murphy, G.C.: Hipikat: recommending pertinent software development artifacts. In: Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE ’03), pp. 408–418 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cubranic, D., Murphy, G.C., Singer, J., Booth, K.S.: Hipikat: a project memory for software development. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 31(6), 446–465 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kagdi, H., Collard, M.L., Maletic, J.I.: A survey and taxonomy of approaches for mining software repositories in the context of software evolution. J. Softw. Maint. Evol. 19(2), 77–131 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kilpinen, M.S.: The emergence of change at the systems engineering and software design interface: an investigation of impact analysis. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lehnert, S.: A taxonomy for software change impact analysis. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution and the 7th Annual ERCIM Workshop on Software Evolution (IWPSE-EVOL 2011), Szeged, Hungary, September 2011, pp. 41–50 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lehnert, S.: A review of software change impact analysis. Technical report, Technische Universität Ilmenau (2011). URN: urn:nbn:de:gbv:ilm1-2011200618

    Google Scholar 

  10. Li, B., Sun, X., Leung, H., Zhang, S.: A survey of code-based change impact analysis techniques. Softw. Test. Verification Reliab. 23, 613–646 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lindvall, M., Sandahl, K.: How well do experienced software developers predict software change? J. Syst. Softw. (archive) 43(1), 19–27 (1998). Elsevier Science Inc., New York, NY, USA

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Van de Laar, P.: Transferring evolutionary couplings to industry. In: Van de Laar, P., Punter, T. (eds.) Views on Evolvability of Embedded Systems, pp. 69–88. Embedded Systems. Springer, Rotterdam (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Pirklbauer, G., Fasching, Ch., Kurschl, W.: Improving change impact analysis with a tight integrated process and tool. In: 7th International Conference on Information Technology: New Generations (ITNG 2010), Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, April 2010, pp. 12–14 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ratzinger, J., Fischer, M., Gall, H.: EvoLens: lens-view visualizations of evolution data. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution (IWPSE ’05), pp. 103–112. IEEE Computer Society (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ren, X., Shah, F., Tip, F., Ryder, B.G., Chesley, O.: Chianti: a tool for change impact analysis of java programs. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA ’04), pp. 432–448 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rijsbergen, C.J.V.: Information Retrieval. Butterworths, London (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sliwerski, J., Zimmermann, T., Zeller, A.: HATARI: raising risk awareness. In: Proceedings of the 10th European Software Engineering Conference, 13th ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE), Lisbon (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tóth, G., Hegedűs, P., Beszédes, Á., Gyimóthy, T., Jász, J.: Comparison of different impact analysis methods and programmer’s opinion: an empirical study. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on the Principles and Practice of Programming in Java (PPPJ ’10), New York, NY, USA, pp. 109–118 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wetzlmaier, T., Klammer, C., Ramler, R.: Extracting dependencies from software changes: an industry experience report. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Joint Conference of the 23rd International Workshop on Software Measurement and the 8th International Conference on Software Process and Product Measurement (IWSM-Mensura). IEEE Computer Society (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zimmermann, T., Zeller, A., Weißgerber, P., Diehl, S.: Mining version histories to guide software changes. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 31(6), 429–445 (2005). IEEE Press

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the competence centers program COMET of the Austrian Research Promotion Agency (FFG). Furthermore, the authors would like to thank the developers involved in the analyzed industry project for participating in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rudolf Ramler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wetzlmaier, T., Ramler, R. (2015). Improving Manual Change Impact Analysis with Tool Support: A Study in an Industrial Project. In: Winkler, D., Biffl, S., Bergsmann, J. (eds) Software Quality. Software and Systems Quality in Distributed and Mobile Environments. SWQD 2015. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 200. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13251-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13251-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13250-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13251-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics