Abstract
For a long of time a country’s development has been synonymous with its economic growth and GDP per capita has been the main indicator expressing a country’s prosperity. Over the last years, however, economies and societies have been undergoing dramatic changes. Globalization, international integration, technological innovation and mobility of capital have changed the picture and make it extremely difficult to predict the future of countries. Economic changes test the ability of all countries to compete and the gap between leading and lagging countries in terms of growth, income and employment may be widening. Social changes test the ability of states and governments to provide an appropriate social framework for their people. Environmental factors test the ability of national and local governments to manage resources in a sustainable manner and to maintain and improve the quality and safety of life. These changes have led to a modification of the targets of development and to the acceptance that the concept of development has to embody human well-being alongside with economic growth. Sustainable development refers to the ability of our societies to meet the needs of the present without sacrificing the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. Measuring sustainable development means going beyond a purely economic description of human activities; requires integration of economic, social and environmental concerns. In other words, sustainable development means ensuring economic efficiency while respecting social equity and safeguarding ecological integrity. New techniques are required in order to benchmark performance, highlight leaders and laggards on various aspects of development and facilitate efforts to identify best practices. New tools have to be designed so as to make sustainability decision-making more objective, systematic and rigorous. Many tools and methodologies have been used over the past years to measure the progress towards sustainability. The majority of those methodologies make use of a single indicator in order to measure separately the evolution of each component i.e. the economic, the social and the environmental. Our objective in the present paper is to (a) outline the process of a country’s development taking into account all its three dimensions, economic, social and environmental; (b) present a model for quantifying its process of development encompassing all those dimensions; (c) apply the model to Eastern European and Baltic countries and (d) discuss the results.
The Cusp Catastrophe Model has also been used in the paper entitled A Region’s Basic Image as a Measure of its Attractiveness, International Journal of Economic Sciences and Applied Research, 4(2), pp. 7–33.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aerts D, Czachor M, Gabora L, Kuna M, Posiewnik A, Pykacz J, Syty M (2003) Quantum morphogenesis: a variation on Thom’s catastrophe theory. Phys Rev E 67:1–13
Angelis V, Dimaki K (2011) A region’s basic image as a measure of its attractiveness. Int J Econ Sci Appl Res 4(2):7–33
Ashworth CJ, Voogd H (1990) Selling the city. Belhaven Press, London
Barbier EB (1987) The concept of sustainable economic development. Environ Conserv 14(2):101–110
Barrios E, Komoto K (2006) Some approaches in the construction of a sustainable development index for the Philippines. Int J Sustain Devel World Ecol 13:277–288
Beinat E, Nijkamp P (1998) Multicriteria evaluation in land use management: methodologies and case studies. Academic, Dordrecht
Bell ML, Hobbs B, Elliott EM, Ellis H, Robinson Z (2001) An evaluation of multicriteria methods in integrated assessment of climate policy. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 10(5):229–256
Bramwell B, Rawding L (1996) Tourism marketing images of industrial cities. Ann Tourism Res 23(1):201–221
Bryson JR, Daniels PW (eds) (2007) The handbook of service industries. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Dichter E (1985) What’s an image. J Consum Mark 2:75–81
Dou E, Ghose W (2006) A dynamic nonlinear model of online retail competition using cusp catastrophe theory. J Bus Res 59:838–848
Dowling GR (1998) Measuring corporate images: a review of alternative approaches. J Bus Res 17:27–37
Du Pisani JA (2006) Sustainable development – historical roots of the concept. Environ Sci 3(2):83–96
Gartner W (1993) Image formation process. J Travel Tourism Mark 2:191–215
Gilmore R (1993) Catastrophe theory for scientists and engineers. Wiley, New York
Hayashi K (2000) Multicriteria analysis for agriculture resource management: a critical survey and future perspectives. Eur J Oper Res 122:486–500
Huang YK (2008) The study of customer segmentation examined by catastrophe model. In: Olya M, Uda R (eds) Towards sustainable society on ubiquitous networks. Springer, Boston, pp 37–48
Janssen R (1992) Multiobjective decision support for environmental management. Academic, Dordrecht
Janssen R, Munda G (1999) Multi-criteria methods for quantitative, qualitative and fuzzy evaluation problem. In: van den Bergh J (ed) Handbook of environmental and resource economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 837–852
Karol P, Brunner J (2009) Tools for measuring progress towards sustainable neighborhood environments. Sustainability 1:612–627
Kotler P, Haider DH, Irving R (1993) Marketing places: attracting investment, industry and tourism to cities, states and nations. Free Press, New York
Kotler P, Asplund C, Rein I, Haider DH (1999) Marketing places Europe. Prentice Hall, London
Mill JS (1883) Principles of political economy, with some of their applications to social philosophy, People’s edition. Longmans Green, London
Munda G (1995) Multicriteria evaluation in a fuzzy environment –theory and applications in ecological economics, Contributions to economics series. Physica – Verlag, Heidelberg
Munda G (2005) Multiple criteria decision analysis and sustainable development. In: Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (eds) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, Boston/Dordrecht
Munda G (2006) Social multi-criteria evaluation for urban sustainability policies. Land Use Policy 23:86–94
Munda G, Nardo M (2009) Non-compensatory/non-linear composite indicators for ranking countries: a defensible setting. Appl Econ 41:1513–1523
Munda G, Paruccini M, Rossi G (1998) Multicriteria evaluation methods in renewable resource management: the case of integrated water management under drought conditions. In: Beinat E, Nijkamp P (eds) Multicriteria evaluation in land-use management: methodologies and case studies. Academic, Dordrecht, pp 79–94
Nijkamp P, Rietveld P, Voogd H (1990) Multicriteria evaluation in physical planning. North-Holland, Amsterdam
Poston T, Stewart I (1996) Catastrophe theory and its applications. Dover, New York
Ringius L, Asbjorn T, Holtsmark B (1998) Can multi-criteria rules fairly distribute climate burdens? OECD results from three burden sharing rules. Ener Pol 26(10):777–793
Romero C, Rehman T (1989) Multiple criteria analysis for agricultural decisions. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Rosser JB (2007) The rise and fall of catastrophe theory applications in economics: was the baby thrown out with bathwater? J Econ Dyn Cont 10:3255–3280
Singh RK, Murty HR, Gupta SK, Dikshit AK (2009) An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol Indic 9:189–212
Smerz KE, Guastello SJ (2008) Cusp catastrophe model for binge drinking in college population. Nonlin Dyn Psychol Life Sci 12:205–224
Smith M, Lancioni RA, Oliva TA (2005) The effects of management inertia on the supply chain performance of produce-to stock firms. Ind Market Manage 24:614–628
Solow R (1991) Sustainability: an economist’s perspective. Lecture to the Marine Policy Centre, Massachusetts
Thom R (1975) Structural stability and morphogenesis: an outline of a general theory of models. Addison-Wesley, Reading
Van der Mass HLJ, Kolsteib R, Van der Pligt J (2003) Sudden transitions in attitudes. Sociol Method Res 32:395–417
Wales DJ (2001) A microscopic basis for the global appearance of energy landscapes. Science 293:602–604
Yigitcanlar T, Dur F (2010) Developing a sustainability assessment model: the sustainable infrastructure, land-use, environment and transport model. Sustainability 2:321–340
Zeeman EC (1973) Applications of catastrophe theory. In: Proceedings of the international conference on manifolds, Tokyo, Japan, pp 11–26
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Angelis, V., Angelis-Dimakis, A., Dimaki, K. (2015). A Country’s Process of Development as Described by a Cusp Catastrophe Model. In: Karasavvoglou, A., Ongan, S., Polychronidou, P. (eds) EU Crisis and the Role of the Periphery. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10133-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10133-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10132-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10133-0
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)