Skip to main content

A Country’s Process of Development as Described by a Cusp Catastrophe Model

The Case of Eastern European and Baltic Countries

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
EU Crisis and the Role of the Periphery

Abstract

For a long of time a country’s development has been synonymous with its economic growth and GDP per capita has been the main indicator expressing a country’s prosperity. Over the last years, however, economies and societies have been undergoing dramatic changes. Globalization, international integration, technological innovation and mobility of capital have changed the picture and make it extremely difficult to predict the future of countries. Economic changes test the ability of all countries to compete and the gap between leading and lagging countries in terms of growth, income and employment may be widening. Social changes test the ability of states and governments to provide an appropriate social framework for their people. Environmental factors test the ability of national and local governments to manage resources in a sustainable manner and to maintain and improve the quality and safety of life. These changes have led to a modification of the targets of development and to the acceptance that the concept of development has to embody human well-being alongside with economic growth. Sustainable development refers to the ability of our societies to meet the needs of the present without sacrificing the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. Measuring sustainable development means going beyond a purely economic description of human activities; requires integration of economic, social and environmental concerns. In other words, sustainable development means ensuring economic efficiency while respecting social equity and safeguarding ecological integrity. New techniques are required in order to benchmark performance, highlight leaders and laggards on various aspects of development and facilitate efforts to identify best practices. New tools have to be designed so as to make sustainability decision-making more objective, systematic and rigorous. Many tools and methodologies have been used over the past years to measure the progress towards sustainability. The majority of those methodologies make use of a single indicator in order to measure separately the evolution of each component i.e. the economic, the social and the environmental. Our objective in the present paper is to (a) outline the process of a country’s development taking into account all its three dimensions, economic, social and environmental; (b) present a model for quantifying its process of development encompassing all those dimensions; (c) apply the model to Eastern European and Baltic countries and (d) discuss the results.

The Cusp Catastrophe Model has also been used in the paper entitled A Region’s Basic Image as a Measure of its Attractiveness, International Journal of Economic Sciences and Applied Research, 4(2), pp. 7–33.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aerts D, Czachor M, Gabora L, Kuna M, Posiewnik A, Pykacz J, Syty M (2003) Quantum morphogenesis: a variation on Thom’s catastrophe theory. Phys Rev E 67:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angelis V, Dimaki K (2011) A region’s basic image as a measure of its attractiveness. Int J Econ Sci Appl Res 4(2):7–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth CJ, Voogd H (1990) Selling the city. Belhaven Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier EB (1987) The concept of sustainable economic development. Environ Conserv 14(2):101–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrios E, Komoto K (2006) Some approaches in the construction of a sustainable development index for the Philippines. Int J Sustain Devel World Ecol 13:277–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beinat E, Nijkamp P (1998) Multicriteria evaluation in land use management: methodologies and case studies. Academic, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bell ML, Hobbs B, Elliott EM, Ellis H, Robinson Z (2001) An evaluation of multicriteria methods in integrated assessment of climate policy. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 10(5):229–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bramwell B, Rawding L (1996) Tourism marketing images of industrial cities. Ann Tourism Res 23(1):201–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryson JR, Daniels PW (eds) (2007) The handbook of service industries. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Dichter E (1985) What’s an image. J Consum Mark 2:75–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dou E, Ghose W (2006) A dynamic nonlinear model of online retail competition using cusp catastrophe theory. J Bus Res 59:838–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowling GR (1998) Measuring corporate images: a review of alternative approaches. J Bus Res 17:27–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du Pisani JA (2006) Sustainable development – historical roots of the concept. Environ Sci 3(2):83–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gartner W (1993) Image formation process. J Travel Tourism Mark 2:191–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore R (1993) Catastrophe theory for scientists and engineers. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi K (2000) Multicriteria analysis for agriculture resource management: a critical survey and future perspectives. Eur J Oper Res 122:486–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang YK (2008) The study of customer segmentation examined by catastrophe model. In: Olya M, Uda R (eds) Towards sustainable society on ubiquitous networks. Springer, Boston, pp 37–48

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen R (1992) Multiobjective decision support for environmental management. Academic, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen R, Munda G (1999) Multi-criteria methods for quantitative, qualitative and fuzzy evaluation problem. In: van den Bergh J (ed) Handbook of environmental and resource economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 837–852

    Google Scholar 

  • Karol P, Brunner J (2009) Tools for measuring progress towards sustainable neighborhood environments. Sustainability 1:612–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler P, Haider DH, Irving R (1993) Marketing places: attracting investment, industry and tourism to cities, states and nations. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler P, Asplund C, Rein I, Haider DH (1999) Marketing places Europe. Prentice Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill JS (1883) Principles of political economy, with some of their applications to social philosophy, People’s edition. Longmans Green, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Munda G (1995) Multicriteria evaluation in a fuzzy environment –theory and applications in ecological economics, Contributions to economics series. Physica – Verlag, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Munda G (2005) Multiple criteria decision analysis and sustainable development. In: Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M (eds) Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Springer, Boston/Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Munda G (2006) Social multi-criteria evaluation for urban sustainability policies. Land Use Policy 23:86–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munda G, Nardo M (2009) Non-compensatory/non-linear composite indicators for ranking countries: a defensible setting. Appl Econ 41:1513–1523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munda G, Paruccini M, Rossi G (1998) Multicriteria evaluation methods in renewable resource management: the case of integrated water management under drought conditions. In: Beinat E, Nijkamp P (eds) Multicriteria evaluation in land-use management: methodologies and case studies. Academic, Dordrecht, pp 79–94

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nijkamp P, Rietveld P, Voogd H (1990) Multicriteria evaluation in physical planning. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Poston T, Stewart I (1996) Catastrophe theory and its applications. Dover, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringius L, Asbjorn T, Holtsmark B (1998) Can multi-criteria rules fairly distribute climate burdens? OECD results from three burden sharing rules. Ener Pol 26(10):777–793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romero C, Rehman T (1989) Multiple criteria analysis for agricultural decisions. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosser JB (2007) The rise and fall of catastrophe theory applications in economics: was the baby thrown out with bathwater? J Econ Dyn Cont 10:3255–3280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh RK, Murty HR, Gupta SK, Dikshit AK (2009) An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol Indic 9:189–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smerz KE, Guastello SJ (2008) Cusp catastrophe model for binge drinking in college population. Nonlin Dyn Psychol Life Sci 12:205–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith M, Lancioni RA, Oliva TA (2005) The effects of management inertia on the supply chain performance of produce-to stock firms. Ind Market Manage 24:614–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow R (1991) Sustainability: an economist’s perspective. Lecture to the Marine Policy Centre, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom R (1975) Structural stability and morphogenesis: an outline of a general theory of models. Addison-Wesley, Reading

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Mass HLJ, Kolsteib R, Van der Pligt J (2003) Sudden transitions in attitudes. Sociol Method Res 32:395–417

    Google Scholar 

  • Wales DJ (2001) A microscopic basis for the global appearance of energy landscapes. Science 293:602–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yigitcanlar T, Dur F (2010) Developing a sustainability assessment model: the sustainable infrastructure, land-use, environment and transport model. Sustainability 2:321–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeeman EC (1973) Applications of catastrophe theory. In: Proceedings of the international conference on manifolds, Tokyo, Japan, pp 11–26

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vasilis Angelis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Angelis, V., Angelis-Dimakis, A., Dimaki, K. (2015). A Country’s Process of Development as Described by a Cusp Catastrophe Model. In: Karasavvoglou, A., Ongan, S., Polychronidou, P. (eds) EU Crisis and the Role of the Periphery. Contributions to Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10133-0_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics