Skip to main content

Using Discriminative Rule Mining to Discover Declarative Process Models with Non-atomic Activities

  • Conference paper
Rules on the Web. From Theory to Applications (RuleML 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 8620))

Abstract

Process discovery techniques try to generate process models from execution logs. Declarative process modeling languages are more suitable than procedural notations for representing the discovery results deriving from logs of processes working in dynamic and low-predictable environments. However, existing declarative discovery approaches aim at mining declarative specifications considering each activity in a business process as an atomic/instantaneous event. In spite of this, often, in realistic environments, process activities are not instantaneous; rather, their execution spans across a time interval and is characterized by a sequence of states of a transactional lifecycle. In this paper, we investigate how to use discriminative rule mining in the discovery task, to characterize lifecycles that determine constraint violations and lifecycles that ensure constraint fulfillments. The approach has been implemented as a plug-in of the process mining tool ProM and validated on synthetic logs and on a real-life log recorded by an incident and problem management system called VINST in use at Volvo IT Belgium.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Van der Aalst, W., Pesic, M., Schonenberg, H.: Declarative Workflows: Balancing Between Flexibility and Support. Computer Science - R&D, 99–113 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bernardi, M.L., Cimitile, M., Lucca, G.A.D., Maggi, F.M.: Using declarative workflow languages to develop process-centric web applications. In: 16th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops, EDOC Workshops, Beijing, China, September 10-14, pp. 56–65 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bose, R.P.J.C., Maggi, F.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Enhancing declare maps based on event correlations. In: Daniel, F., Wang, J., Weber, B. (eds.) BPM 2013. LNCS, vol. 8094, pp. 97–112. Springer, Heidelberg (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40176-3_9

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bose, R.J.C.: Process Mining in the Large: Preprocessing, Discovery, and Diagnostics. Ph.D. thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burattin, A., Maggi, F., van der Aalst, W., Sperduti, A.: Techniques for a Posteriori Analysis of Declarative Processes. In: EDOC, pp. 41–50 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Burattin, A., Sperduti, A.: Heuristics Miner for Time Intervals. In: European Symposium on Artificial Neural Networks (ESANN), Bruges, Belgium (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Caruana, R., Niculescu-Mizil, A.: An empirical comparison of supervised learning algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2006, pp. 161–168. ACM, New York (2006), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1143844.1143865

  8. Cheng, H., Yan, X., Han, J., Yu, P.S.: Direct discriminative pattern mining for effective classification. In: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE 24th International Conference on Data Engineering, ICDE 2008, pp. 169–178. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2008), http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/ICDE.2008.4497425

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chesani, F., Lamma, E., Mello, P., Montali, M., Riguzzi, F., Storari, S.: Exploiting inductive logic programming techniques for declarative process mining. Transactions on Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency II, Special Issue on Concurrency in Process-Aware Information Systems 2, 278–295 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Günther, C.W.: XES Standard Definition (2009), www.xes-standard.org , http://www.xes-standard.org/_media/xes/xes_standard_proposal.pdf

  11. Kupferman, O., Vardi, M.: Vacuity Detection in Temporal Model Checking. Int. Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer, 224–233 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lo, D., Cheng, H.: Lucia: Mining closed discriminative dyadic sequential patterns. In: Proc. of the International Conference on Extending Database Technology (EDBT), pp. 21–32. Springer (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maggi, F.M., Bose, R.P.J.C., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Efficient discovery of understandable declarative models from event logs. In: Ralyté, J., Franch, X., Brinkkemper, S., Wrycza, S. (eds.) CAiSE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7328, pp. 270–285. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Montali, M., Pesic, M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Chesani, F., Mello, P., Storari, S.: Declarative Specification and Verification of Service Choreographies. ACM Transactions on the Web 4(1) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pesic, M., Schonenberg, M.H., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Declare: Full support for loosely-structured processes. In: EDOC, pp. 287–300 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Quinlan, J.R.: C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. M. Kaufmann Publishers Inc. (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Steeman, W.: Bpi challenge 2013, incidents (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.4121/uuid:500573e6-accc-4b0c-9576-aa5468b10cee

  18. Sun, C., Du, J., Chen, N., Khoo, S.C., Yang, Y.: Mining explicit rules for software process evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Software and System Process, ICSSP 2013, pp. 118–125. ACM, New York (2013), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2486046.2486067

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Verbeek, E.H.M.W., Buijs, J., van Dongen, B., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: ProM 6: The Process Mining Toolkit. In: BPM 2010 Demo, pp. 34–39 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bernardi, M.L., Cimitile, M., Di Francescomarino, C., Maggi, F.M. (2014). Using Discriminative Rule Mining to Discover Declarative Process Models with Non-atomic Activities. In: Bikakis, A., Fodor, P., Roman, D. (eds) Rules on the Web. From Theory to Applications. RuleML 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8620. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09870-8_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09870-8_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09869-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09870-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics