Skip to main content

Defining Key Semantics for the RDF Datasets: Experiments and Evaluations

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8577))

Abstract

Many techniques were recently proposed to automate the linkage of RDF datasets. Predicate selection is the step of the linkage process that consists in selecting the smallest set of relevant predicates needed to enable instance comparison. We call keys this set of predicates that is analogous to the notion of keys in relational databases. We explain formally the different assumptions behind two existing key semantics. We then evaluate experimentally the keys by studying how discovered keys could help dataset interlinking or cleaning. We discuss the experimental results and show that the two different semantics lead to comparable results on the studied datasets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arasu, A., Ré, C., Suciu, D.: Large-scale deduplication with constraints using dedupalog. In: ICDE, pp. 952–963 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Atencia, M., David, J., Scharffe, F.: Keys and pseudo-keys detection for web datasets cleansing and interlinking. In: ten Teije, A., Völker, J., Handschuh, S., Stuckenschmidt, H., d’Acquin, M., Nikolov, A., Aussenac-Gilles, N., Hernandez, N. (eds.) EKAW 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7603, pp. 144–153. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Baxter, R., Christen, P., Churches, T.: A comparison of fast blocking methods for record linkage. In: KDD 2003 Workshops, pp. 25–27 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elmagarmid, A.K., Ipeirotis, P.G., Verykios, V.S.: Duplicate record detection: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 19, 1–16 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ferrara, A., Nikolov, A., Scharffe, F.: Data linking for the semantic web. Int. J. Semantic Web Inf. Syst. 7(3), 46–76 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hu, W., Chen, J., Qu, Y.: A self-training approach for resolving object coreference on the semantic web. In: WWW, pp. 87–96 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Huhtala, Y., Kärkkäinen, J., Porkka, P., Toivonen, H.: Tane: An efficient algorithm for discovering functional and approximate dependencies. The Computer Journal 42(2), 100–111 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Isele, R., Bizer, C.: Learning expressive linkage rules using genetic programming. PVLDB 5(11), 1638–1649 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Isele, R., Jentzsch, A., Bizer, C.: Efficient multidimensional blocking for link discovery without losing recall. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on the Web and Databases (WebDB), Greece (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Michelson, M., Knoblock, C.A.: Learning blocking schemes for record linkage. In: AAAI, pp. 440–445 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ngonga Ngomo, A.-C., Lyko, K.: EAGLE: Efficient active learning of link specifications using genetic programming. In: Simperl, E., Cimiano, P., Polleres, A., Corcho, O., Presutti, V. (eds.) ESWC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7295, pp. 149–163. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nikolov, A., d’Aquin, M., Motta, E.: Unsupervised learning of link discovery configuration. In: Simperl, E., Cimiano, P., Polleres, A., Corcho, O., Presutti, V. (eds.) ESWC 2012. LNCS, vol. 7295, pp. 119–133. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nikolov, A., Motta, E.: Data linking: Capturing and utilising implicit schema-level relations. In: Proceedings of Linked Data on the Web Workshop at 19th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2010) (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Patel-Schneider, P.F., Hayes, P., Horrocks, I.: OWL Web Ontology Language Semantics and Abstract Syntax Section 5. RDF-Compatible Model-Theoretic Semantics. Technical report, W3C (December 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Pernelle, N., Sais, F., Symeonidou, D.: An automatic key discovery approach for data linking. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. W. Recommendation. Owl 2 web ontology language: Direct semantics. In: Motik, B., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Cuenca Grau, B. (eds.) W3C (October 27, 2009), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-direct-semantics/

  17. W. Recommendation. Owl 2 web ontology language: Structural specification and functional-style syntax. In: Motik, B., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Parsia, B. (eds.) W3C (October 27, 2009), http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-syntax/

  18. Saïs, F., Pernelle, N., Rousset, M.-C.: L2r: A logical method for reference reconciliation. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, pp. 329–334 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Saïs, F., Pernelle, N., Rousset, M.-C.: Combining a logical and a numerical method for data reconciliation. In: Spaccapietra, S. (ed.) Journal on Data Semantics XII. LNCS, vol. 5480, pp. 66–94. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Song, D., Heflin, J.: Automatically generating data linkages using a domain-independent candidate selection approach. In: Aroyo, L., Welty, C., Alani, H., Taylor, J., Bernstein, A., Kagal, L., Noy, N., Blomqvist, E. (eds.) ISWC 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7031, pp. 649–664. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Suchanek, F.M., Abiteboul, S., Senellart, P.: Paris: Probabilistic alignment of relations, instances, and schema. The Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment (PVLDB) 5(3), 157–168 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Volz, J., Bizer, C., Gaedke, M., Kobilarov, G.: Discovering and maintaining links on the web of data. In: Bernstein, A., Karger, D.R., Heath, T., Feigenbaum, L., Maynard, D., Motta, E., Thirunarayan, K. (eds.) ISWC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5823, pp. 650–665. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Atencia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Atencia, M. et al. (2014). Defining Key Semantics for the RDF Datasets: Experiments and Evaluations. In: Hernandez, N., Jäschke, R., Croitoru, M. (eds) Graph-Based Representation and Reasoning. ICCS 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8577. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08389-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08389-6_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08388-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08389-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics